feat(brain): validate the claim-property envelope on write (brain#21) (#102)

First half of brain#21: half_life (volatile|seasonal|durable), applies
(local|homelab|universal), claim_provenance (asserted|inferred).

writeHallNote already passed unknown frontmatter keys through verbatim, so
preservation was free — a test now pins it so a refactor of the merge loop
cannot silently drop the fields. What was missing is validation, and it
fails closed: a value outside the enum is rejected (a lint skips what it
cannot parse, so the note would read as classified while nothing acts on
it); an envelope field without claim_provenance is rejected (a value a
model inferred must never be indistinguishable from one a human asserted,
or a single classifier pass launders guesses into apparent judgement
across the corpus); provenance alone is rejected too.

Validation runs before MkdirAll, so a rejected write leaves nothing behind.

The field is `applies`, not `scope`: scope: has been in use since brain#5
for glossary terms (homelab-core, project:<repo>), a disjoint value space
on the same key. The shipped schema keeps the name.

Notes with none of these fields are byte-identical to before. Bulk
backfill stays out of scope.

Schema documented in brain/CLAUDE.md via brain_edit_root, which produced
the hyperguild#97 audit record for the rewrite.

Refs brain#21, brain#19 (superseded), brain#5, hyperguild#97.

Co-authored-by: Mathias <mthbqv@gmail.com>

ingestion/internal/claim/claim.go

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+// Package claim validates the claim-property frontmatter that says when and
+// where a note's claim holds, and who decided that (brain#21).
+//
+// Two families were designed together and land separately. This is the
+// applicability envelope:
+//
+//	half_life:        volatile | seasonal | durable   — how fast it decays
+//	applies:          local | homelab | universal     — how widely it holds
+//	claim_provenance: asserted | inferred             — who set the above
+//
+// The strength family (confidence, contested) follows once the ingest-time
+// contradiction detector exists to populate it.
+//
+// Why the envelope is validated rather than merely accepted: a value outside
+// the enum is worse than an absent one. A lint skips what it cannot parse, so
+// the note reads as classified while nothing acts on it — the field becomes
+// decoration that suppresses the very review it was added to trigger.
+//
+// Why `applies` and not `scope`: `scope:` has been in use since brain#5 for
+// glossary terms (`homelab-core`, `project:<repo>`) — a disjoint value space
+// on the same key. The shipped schema keeps the name; this one takes another.
+package claim
+
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"strings"
+)
+
+// Field names, exported so writers and lints agree on the spelling.
+const (
+	FieldHalfLife   = "half_life"
+	FieldApplies    = "applies"
+	FieldProvenance = "claim_provenance"
+)
+
+var (
+	halfLives   = []string{"volatile", "seasonal", "durable"}
+	appliesTo   = []string{"local", "homelab", "universal"}
+	provenances = []string{"asserted", "inferred"}
+)
+
+// ValidateEnvelope checks the envelope fields of one note's frontmatter.
+//
+// Absent fields are valid: the envelope is opt-in for new writes, and a
+// corpus-wide backfill is deliberately out of scope (brain#21) — inferring
+// 1113 notes' properties in bulk has the same failure mode as the extraction
+// pass that produced 28 wrong wikilinks out of 67.
+func ValidateEnvelope(fm map[string]string) error {
+	halfLife, hasHalfLife := present(fm, FieldHalfLife)
+	applies, hasApplies := present(fm, FieldApplies)
+	prov, hasProv := present(fm, FieldProvenance)
+
+	if hasHalfLife {
+		if err := oneOf(FieldHalfLife, halfLife, halfLives); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+	}
+	if hasApplies {
+		if err := oneOf(FieldApplies, applies, appliesTo); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+	}
+	if hasProv {
+		if err := oneOf(FieldProvenance, prov, provenances); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+	}
+
+	// The field and its provenance travel together or not at all. A value
+	// whose author is unknown cannot be trusted differently from one Mathias
+	// asserted, which is how an inferred guess hardens into accepted fact.
+	switch {
+	case (hasHalfLife || hasApplies) && !hasProv:
+		return fmt.Errorf("%s is required when %s or %s is set",
+			FieldProvenance, FieldHalfLife, FieldApplies)
+	case hasProv && !hasHalfLife && !hasApplies:
+		return fmt.Errorf("%s is set but neither %s nor %s is",
+			FieldProvenance, FieldHalfLife, FieldApplies)
+	}
+	return nil
+}
+
+// present reports a trimmed field value and whether it was set to anything
+// non-empty. A key written with an empty value is treated as absent rather
+// than as an error: that is a caller emitting a placeholder, not asserting.
+func present(fm map[string]string, key string) (string, bool) {
+	v := strings.TrimSpace(fm[key])
+	return v, v != ""
+}
+
+func oneOf(field, value string, allowed []string) error {
+	for _, a := range allowed {
+		if a == value {
+			return nil
+		}
+	}
+	return fmt.Errorf("%s: %q is not one of %s", field, value, strings.Join(allowed, ", "))
+}

ingestion/internal/claim/claim_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// Package claim_test covers the claim-property envelope (brain#21).
+package claim_test
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/mathiasbq/hyperguild/ingestion/internal/claim"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+)
+
+func TestValidateEnvelope(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name    string
+		fm      map[string]string
+		wantErr string
+	}{
+		{
+			name: "absent is fine — the fields are opt-in on new writes",
+			fm:   map[string]string{"wing": "homelab", "hall": "facts"},
+		},
+		{
+			name: "complete envelope with provenance",
+			fm: map[string]string{
+				"half_life": "durable", "applies": "universal", "claim_provenance": "asserted",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			name: "inferred provenance is equally valid — it just must be stated",
+			fm: map[string]string{
+				"half_life": "volatile", "applies": "local", "claim_provenance": "inferred",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			// A value nobody can act on is worse than no value: a lint
+			// silently skips it, so the note looks classified and isn't.
+			name:    "unknown half_life value",
+			fm:      map[string]string{"half_life": "forever", "claim_provenance": "asserted"},
+			wantErr: `half_life: "forever" is not one of volatile, seasonal, durable`,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "unknown applies value",
+			fm:      map[string]string{"applies": "galaxy", "claim_provenance": "asserted"},
+			wantErr: `applies: "galaxy" is not one of local, homelab, universal`,
+		},
+		{
+			// brain#21: a value a model inferred must never be
+			// indistinguishable from one Mathias asserted. Writing the field
+			// without saying who set it is exactly that laundering.
+			name:    "envelope field without provenance",
+			fm:      map[string]string{"half_life": "durable"},
+			wantErr: "claim_provenance is required when half_life or applies is set",
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "applies without provenance",
+			fm:      map[string]string{"applies": "homelab"},
+			wantErr: "claim_provenance is required when half_life or applies is set",
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "unknown provenance value",
+			fm:      map[string]string{"half_life": "durable", "claim_provenance": "probably"},
+			wantErr: `claim_provenance: "probably" is not one of asserted, inferred`,
+		},
+		{
+			// Provenance alone says who set fields that aren't there.
+			name:    "provenance without any envelope field",
+			fm:      map[string]string{"claim_provenance": "asserted"},
+			wantErr: "claim_provenance is set but neither half_life nor applies is",
+		},
+		{
+			// The glossary wing has used scope: homelab-core since #5. The
+			// envelope deliberately does NOT claim that key (brain#21).
+			name: "glossary scope is untouched",
+			fm:   map[string]string{"scope": "homelab-core", "term": "koala"},
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			err := claim.ValidateEnvelope(tt.fm)
+			if tt.wantErr == "" {
+				assert.NoError(t, err)
+				return
+			}
+			require.Error(t, err)
+			assert.Contains(t, err.Error(), tt.wantErr)
+		})
+	}
+}