feat(pipeline): feed the current source page into the extraction prompt (#106) (#132)

Co-authored-by: Mathias <mthbqv@gmail.com>

ingestion/internal/wiki/merge_test.go

@@ -305,6 +305,98 @@ Rewritten by the model.
 	assert.Equal(t, want, got)
 }
 
+// --- hyperguild#106: heading casing drift must not fork a section ----------
+// Page-aware extraction asks the model to revise the page it's given, but
+// nothing guarantees the model reproduces a heading's exact on-disk casing
+// ("Key Claims" vs "Key claims"). Without normalizing the match key, that
+// drift silently creates a near-duplicate section instead of updating the
+// original — the failure mode #106 exists to close.
+
+func TestMerge_HeadingCaseDriftMatchesSameSection(t *testing.T) {
+	a := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Key Claims\n\n- Appetite beats estimation.\n"}
+	b := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Key claims\n\n- New pattern holds under load.\n"}
+
+	got := Merge(a, b).Content
+
+	assert.Equal(t, 1, strings.Count(got, "## Key"),
+		"casing drift in the heading must not create a second section")
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "Appetite beats estimation.")
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "New pattern holds under load.",
+		"the differently-cased section's content must still be unioned in")
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "## Key Claims",
+		"the on-disk heading's original casing must be preserved in the output")
+	assert.NotContains(t, got, "## Key claims",
+		"the fresh extraction's heading casing must not overwrite the on-disk display text")
+}
+
+func TestMerge_HeadingWhitespaceDriftMatchesSameSection(t *testing.T) {
+	a := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Open Questions \n\n- Does appetite scale?\n"}
+	b := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n##  Open Questions\n\n- What about remote teams?\n"}
+
+	got := Merge(a, b).Content
+
+	assert.Equal(t, 1, strings.Count(got, "## Open Questions"),
+		"surrounding whitespace drift in the heading must not create a second section")
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "Does appetite scale?")
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "What about remote teams?")
+}
+
+func TestMerge_PreExistingCaseDuplicateHeadingsRouteToTheFirstOccurrence(t *testing.T) {
+	// Found in review of PR #130: normalizeHeading's idx map is built by
+	// iterating secsA with idx[normalizeHeading(s.heading)] = i -- last
+	// write wins. Before heading normalization existed, two on-disk
+	// sections differing only by case (real, pre-existing corpus drift --
+	// the exact pattern #106 itself cites) never collided, since idx keyed
+	// on the exact string. After normalization they collide, and every
+	// fresh update silently, deterministically routes to whichever
+	// duplicate happens to appear LAST in the file -- the first one is
+	// frozen forever, never receiving updates again, with nothing to say
+	// so. A Contains-only check doesn't catch this: nothing is literally
+	// deleted, a bullet just lands under the wrong of two still-present
+	// headings. Assert it lands under the FIRST occurrence instead —
+	// deterministic and matches "earliest is canonical," same reasoning
+	// as every other on-disk-wins default in this file.
+	a := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Key Claims\n\n- claim one\n\n## KEY CLAIMS\n\n- claim two\n"}
+	b := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Key Claims\n\n- claim one\n- fresh claim\n"}
+
+	got := Merge(a, b).Content
+
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "## Key Claims\n\n- claim one\n- fresh claim\n",
+		"the fresh bullet must land in the first-occurrence section, not silently route to the last duplicate")
+	assert.Contains(t, got, "## KEY CLAIMS\n\n- claim two\n",
+		"the second duplicate is untouched by this update, not merged into or overwritten")
+}
+
+func TestMergeReport_SelfMergeOfPreExistingDuplicateHeadingsReportsNoConflict(t *testing.T) {
+	// Found in review of PR #132: first-occurrence-wins routes ALL of b's
+	// occurrences of a normalized heading to a's FIRST occurrence, not to
+	// their own positional counterpart. So merging a page against itself
+	// (or an echoed-back copy, exactly what #106's revision prompt can
+	// produce) pairs b's second "## NOTES" against a's first "## Notes" —
+	// different content, same normalized key — and MergeReport wrongly
+	// reports a disagreement where none exists. Fixed by pairing
+	// positionally: b's Nth occurrence of a normalized heading matches a's
+	// Nth occurrence, not always the first.
+	page := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Notes\n\nFirst note.\n\n## NOTES\n\nSecond note.\n"}
+
+	_, conflicts := MergeReport(page, page)
+	assert.Empty(t, conflicts, "merging a page with pre-existing duplicate headings against itself must report no conflicts")
+}
+
+func TestMergeReport_DuplicateHeadingsPairPositionallyNotAllToFirst(t *testing.T) {
+	// Companion case: b has genuinely different content in its second
+	// occurrence of the normalized heading — that must compare against a's
+	// second occurrence (and report if they disagree), not against a's
+	// first (which would either false-positive if a's first differs, or
+	// false-negative-mask a real disagreement in the second pair).
+	a := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Notes\n\nFirst note.\n\n## NOTES\n\nSecond note.\n"}
+	b := Page{Path: "p.md", Content: "---\ntitle: X\n---\n\n## Notes\n\nFirst note.\n\n## NOTES\n\nSecond note, revised.\n"}
+
+	_, conflicts := MergeReport(a, b)
+	assert.Equal(t, []string{"NOTES"}, conflicts,
+		"only the second occurrence, which actually disagrees, is reported")
+}
+
 func TestRefreshOwned_CommentLinesSurviveUnmangled(t *testing.T) {
 	// Third review round on PR #126: parseFrontmatterBlock dropped the
 	// sibling api package's comment guard (strings.HasPrefix(trimmed, "#")).