fix(wiki): surface merge conflicts as textual-diff warnings (closes #104)

Textual-diff conflict detection only (semantic contradiction detection via brain-gardener Judge deferred, confirmed by Mathias, comment 12594). Includes canonicalBlock whitespace-run normalization fix for the disagreement comparison.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathias <mthbqv@gmail.com>

ingestion/internal/wiki/merge_test.go

@@ -332,3 +332,85 @@ func TestRefreshOwned_IndentedListItemsWithColonsAreNotMisparsedAsKeys(t *testin
 	got := refreshOwned(a, b)
 	assert.Equal(t, "---\naliases:\n  - 'Chapter 3: The Reckoning'\ntitle: 'X'\nsource_hash: bbbb\n---\n", got)
 }
+
+func TestMerge_ReportsSectionsWhereTheFreshVersionWasDiscarded(t *testing.T) {
+	// The asymmetry that makes ingest safe (on-disk wins) also throws away a
+	// real signal: the source now says something different about a section we
+	// already have. Today that disagreement is silently discarded, so nobody
+	// can tell "the source is unchanged" from "the source changed its mind and
+	// we ignored it".
+	existing := Page{Path: "wiki/sources/x.md", Content: `---
+title: 'X'
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Appetite is fixed, scope is variable.
+
+## Method
+
+Six-week cycles.
+`}
+	fresh := Page{Path: "wiki/sources/x.md", Content: `---
+title: 'X'
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Appetite is negotiable and scope is fixed.
+
+## Method
+
+Six-week cycles.
+`}
+
+	got, conflicts := MergeReport(existing, fresh)
+
+	assert.Contains(t, got.Content, "Appetite is fixed", "on-disk version still wins")
+	assert.NotContains(t, got.Content, "negotiable")
+	assert.Equal(t, []string{"Summary"}, conflicts,
+		"only the section that actually disagreed is reported")
+}
+
+func TestMerge_ReportsNothingWhenTheFreshVersionAgrees(t *testing.T) {
+	page := Page{Path: "wiki/sources/x.md", Content: `---
+title: 'X'
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Appetite is fixed, scope is variable.
+`}
+
+	_, conflicts := MergeReport(page, page)
+	assert.Empty(t, conflicts, "identical content is not a disagreement")
+}
+
+func TestMerge_ReportsNothingForInternalWhitespaceVariantsOnly(t *testing.T) {
+	// Found in review of PR #129: the conflict comparison used raw
+	// strings.TrimSpace, which only tolerates LEADING/TRAILING whitespace —
+	// unlike appendNew/mergeBullets, which already canonicalize internal
+	// whitespace runs too (#103: a re-extraction's spacing isn't guaranteed
+	// byte-stable). A mid-line double-space from re-extraction would
+	// false-positive as a "disagreement" here even though every other
+	// whitespace-sensitive comparison in this file already tolerates it.
+	existing := Page{Path: "wiki/sources/x.md", Content: `---
+title: 'X'
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Appetite  is fixed,   scope is variable.
+`}
+	fresh := Page{Path: "wiki/sources/x.md", Content: `---
+title: 'X'
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+Appetite is fixed, scope is variable.
+`}
+
+	_, conflicts := MergeReport(existing, fresh)
+	assert.Empty(t, conflicts, "internal whitespace differences alone are not a disagreement")
+}