chore(context): regenerate derived adapters from the canonical root context

ContextAdapterDrift was firing for 13 repos. Picks up behaviour rule 7
("Finish what's closable"), which landed in ~/dev/.context/AGENT.md and never
reached any repo's derived files.

Where mcp.json changes, it also picks up root MCP config the repo was stale on:
brain/gitea/infra move from public hostnames to tailnet Serve URLs, and gitea's
bearer changes from GITEA_MCP_TOKEN to DMABE_GITEA_API_TOKEN — gitea-mcp
authenticates by pass-through and 401s on the former, so a harness syncing from
the old file had a dead gitea server and no signal saying so.

No literal secrets: mcp.json carries ${VAR} placeholders only.

CLAUDE.md deliberately unchanged — context-sync writes it from PROJECT.md alone,
since Claude Code walks up to ~/dev/CLAUDE.md for root context.

Refs mathias/infra ContextAdapterDrift

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.context/system-prompt.txt

@@ -106,6 +106,19 @@ These rules apply to every task across every project, regardless of harness.
    revisit Y". Those are exactly the items that need a locator. If it is worth
    saying in a summary, it is worth writing where it can be found again without you.
 
+7. **Finish what's closable — only involve me for a genuine call.** If a
+   tracker issue, PR, or checklist item is demonstrably resolved — the fix
+   landed, the state changed, you verified it live — close/merge/check it off
+   in the same turn. Don't leave it open "for the record" or park it waiting
+   on me to confirm something that already happened; that's bookkeeping, not
+   a decision. Reserve asking me (`AskUserQuestion`, a `DECISION NEEDED`
+   comment, or otherwise pausing) for when it's genuinely mine to call:
+   irreversible or prod/host-impacting actions, a real judgment call with no
+   clearly-better option, ambiguous intent, or anything secret-writes/
+   destructive-git already gate. Before claiming something is closable,
+   verify it live (re-check the issue, re-run the command) rather than
+   trusting your own earlier summary (brain: `filed-issue-not-same-as-fixed`).
+
 ## CAD sprint patterns
 
 Two CAD sprint archetypes (defs: brain `wiki/homelab/decisions/continuous-agentic-development-cad-concept-2026-06-16`):

AGENTS.md

@@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ These rules apply to every task across every project, regardless of harness.
    revisit Y". Those are exactly the items that need a locator. If it is worth
    saying in a summary, it is worth writing where it can be found again without you.
 
+7. **Finish what's closable — only involve me for a genuine call.** If a
+   tracker issue, PR, or checklist item is demonstrably resolved — the fix
+   landed, the state changed, you verified it live — close/merge/check it off
+   in the same turn. Don't leave it open "for the record" or park it waiting
+   on me to confirm something that already happened; that's bookkeeping, not
+   a decision. Reserve asking me (`AskUserQuestion`, a `DECISION NEEDED`
+   comment, or otherwise pausing) for when it's genuinely mine to call:
+   irreversible or prod/host-impacting actions, a real judgment call with no
+   clearly-better option, ambiguous intent, or anything secret-writes/
+   destructive-git already gate. Before claiming something is closable,
+   verify it live (re-check the issue, re-run the command) rather than
+   trusting your own earlier summary (brain: `filed-issue-not-same-as-fixed`).
+
 ## CAD sprint patterns
 
 Two CAD sprint archetypes (defs: brain `wiki/homelab/decisions/continuous-agentic-development-cad-concept-2026-06-16`):