fix(mcp): validate the claim envelope before brain_edit writes too #136
@@ -275,10 +275,15 @@ func checkClaimEnvelope(brainDir, path, oldStr, newStr string) error {
|
||||
// — this function's job is the envelope, not read failures.
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
block, ok := frontmatterBlock(string(before))
|
||||
if !ok || !strings.Contains(block, oldStr) {
|
||||
return nil // old_str isn't in the frontmatter block at all
|
||||
}
|
||||
// No gate on where old_str falls relative to the frontmatter fence:
|
||||
// round 2 found that requiring old_str to be fully contained in the
|
||||
// extracted block was itself bypassable by an old_str disambiguated
|
||||
// across the closing "---" into the body. Simpler and bypass-proof:
|
||||
// always compute what the edit would produce and validate that
|
||||
// resulting state's envelope. A body-only edit leaves the frontmatter
|
||||
// (and thus the validation outcome) unchanged, so this is a no-op for
|
||||
// the common case and fail-closed for every case that touches the
|
||||
// envelope, regardless of how old_str is phrased.
|
||||
after := strings.Replace(string(before), oldStr, newStr, 1)
|
||||
return claim.ValidateEnvelope(frontmatterScalars(after))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -141,6 +141,33 @@ func TestBrainEdit_RejectsAValueOnlyEditThatBreaksTheEnvelope(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
assert.Contains(t, string(got), "claim_provenance: asserted", "rejected edit must leave the note byte-identical")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestBrainEdit_RejectsAnOldStrThatCrossesTheClosingFence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Found in round-2 review: the position-based gate required old_str to
|
||||
// be fully CONTAINED in the extracted frontmatter block (which excludes
|
||||
// both "---" fence lines). An old_str disambiguated by extending past
|
||||
// the closing fence into the body — a natural choice, since notes.Edit
|
||||
// requires old_str to be unique in the file — fails that containment
|
||||
// test, so checkClaimEnvelope skips validation entirely while
|
||||
// notes.Edit still applies the replace verbatim. Same invalid-enum
|
||||
// outcome as the original two bypasses, reached a third way.
|
||||
dir := newBrainRepo(t)
|
||||
note := filepath.Join(dir, "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(note,
|
||||
[]byte("---\ntitle: 'n'\nhalf_life: durable\napplies: universal\nclaim_provenance: asserted\n---\n\nbody\n"), 0o644))
|
||||
srv := mcp.NewServer(dir, nil, nil, nil)
|
||||
|
||||
resp := call(t, srv, "brain_edit", map[string]any{
|
||||
"path": "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md",
|
||||
"old_str": "asserted\n---\n\nbody",
|
||||
"new_str": "guessed\n---\n\nbody",
|
||||
})
|
||||
require.Contains(t, resp, "error", "%v", resp)
|
||||
|
||||
got, err := os.ReadFile(note)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.Contains(t, string(got), "claim_provenance: asserted", "rejected edit must leave the note byte-identical")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestBrainEdit_AllowsAValidClaimEnvelopeEdit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
dir := newBrainRepo(t)
|
||||
note := filepath.Join(dir, "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md")
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user