ingestion/internal/mcp/tools_notes.go

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import (
 
 	"github.com/mathiasbq/hyperguild/ingestion/internal/brain"
 	"github.com/mathiasbq/hyperguild/ingestion/internal/capture"
+	"github.com/mathiasbq/hyperguild/ingestion/internal/claim"
 	"github.com/mathiasbq/hyperguild/ingestion/internal/classification"
 	"github.com/mathiasbq/hyperguild/ingestion/internal/notes"
 )
@@ -179,6 +180,21 @@ func (s *Server) editWithScope(args json.RawMessage, scope notes.Scope) (notes.R
 	if err := json.Unmarshal(args, &a); err != nil {
 		return notes.Result{}, nil, fmt.Errorf("parse args: %w", err)
 	}
+
+	// hyperguild#123: brain_write/brain_update both validate the claim
+	// envelope before writing (hyperguild#111: "same rules when a note
+	// changes as when it's born"); brain_edit didn't — a byte-level string
+	// replace has no frontmatter awareness at all, so it could rewrite an
+	// existing half_life:/applies:/claim_provenance: line straight past the
+	// validator entirely. Scoped to notes only (governance files have no
+	// claim-envelope concept) and gated on a cheap substring check so an
+	// edit that never touches these field names pays nothing extra.
+	if scope == notes.ScopeNotes && touchesClaimEnvelope(a.OldStr, a.NewStr) {
+		if verr := validateEnvelopeAfterEdit(s.brainDir, a.Path, a.OldStr, a.NewStr); verr != nil {
+			return notes.Result{}, nil, fmt.Errorf("claim envelope: %w", verr)
+		}
+	}
+
 	res, err := notes.Edit(s.brainDir, a.Path, a.OldStr, a.NewStr, scope)
 	if err != nil {
 		if errors.Is(err, notes.ErrDegenerate) && a.OldStr == "" {
@@ -228,3 +244,67 @@ func touchesFrontmatter(oldStr, newStr string) bool {
 	}
 	return false
 }
+
+// touchesClaimEnvelope reports whether oldStr/newStr mention any of the
+// three claim-envelope field names — the cheap gate that lets an ordinary
+// body edit skip the read-and-validate round trip entirely.
+func touchesClaimEnvelope(oldStr, newStr string) bool {
+	for _, s := range []string{oldStr, newStr} {
+		if strings.Contains(s, claim.FieldHalfLife) || strings.Contains(s, claim.FieldApplies) || strings.Contains(s, claim.FieldProvenance) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}
+
+// validateEnvelopeAfterEdit previews what oldStr->newStr would produce —
+// the exact strings.Replace(before, oldStr, newStr, 1) formula notes.Edit
+// itself uses internally — and validates the resulting frontmatter's claim
+// envelope before the real edit is allowed to run. Fail-closed: an invalid
+// result blocks the edit entirely, the same posture writeHallNote/UpdateNote
+// already apply on create/supersede.
+//
+// This does not replicate notes.Edit's uniqueness/CRLF/conflict-marker
+// checks — if old_str is absent or ambiguous, this preview may not match
+// what Edit ultimately does, but Edit independently and correctly rejects
+// those cases at write time regardless of what this function decides, so
+// the only thing riding on this preview's accuracy is the envelope check
+// itself, not write safety.
+func validateEnvelopeAfterEdit(brainDir, path, oldStr, newStr string) error {
+	before, err := notes.Read(brainDir, path)
+	if err != nil {
+		// Let notes.Edit itself produce the real error (missing file, etc.)
+		// — this function's job is the envelope, not read failures.
+		return nil
+	}
+	after := strings.Replace(string(before), oldStr, newStr, 1)
+	return claim.ValidateEnvelope(frontmatterScalars(after))
+}
+
+// frontmatterScalars extracts top-level "key: value" scalar pairs from
+// doc's leading fence block, for the claim-envelope check only — not a
+// general frontmatter parser. Indented lines (YAML block-list items,
+// wrapped values) are skipped rather than misparsed as keys, same fix as
+// hyperguild#126/#128 in the sibling packages this mirrors.
+func frontmatterScalars(doc string) map[string]string {
+	out := map[string]string{}
+	if !strings.HasPrefix(doc, "---\n") {
+		return out
+	}
+	rest := doc[len("---\n"):]
+	end := strings.Index(rest, "\n---\n")
+	if end < 0 {
+		return out
+	}
+	for _, line := range strings.Split(rest[:end], "\n") {
+		if line != "" && (line[0] == ' ' || line[0] == '\t') {
+			continue
+		}
+		key, val, ok := strings.Cut(line, ":")
+		if !ok {
+			continue
+		}
+		out[strings.TrimSpace(key)] = strings.TrimSpace(val)
+	}
+	return out
+}

ingestion/internal/mcp/tools_notes_test.go

@@ -93,6 +93,78 @@ func TestBrainEdit_EmptyOldStrErrorNamesRawArgumentBytes(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.Contains(t, errMsg, "raw arguments were", "%v", errMsg)
 }
 
+func TestBrainEdit_RejectsAnInvalidClaimEnvelopeWrittenViaStringReplace(t *testing.T) {
+	// hyperguild#123: brain_write/brain_update both validate the claim
+	// envelope (half_life/applies/claim_provenance) before writing —
+	// brain_edit didn't, even though it's the one live, model-facing path
+	// that can rewrite an existing envelope line directly via raw string
+	// replace, no parsing involved. "same rules when a note changes as when
+	// it's born" (hyperguild#111's own framing) applies here too.
+	dir := newBrainRepo(t)
+	note := filepath.Join(dir, "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md")
+	require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(note,
+		[]byte("---\ntitle: 'n'\nhalf_life: durable\napplies: universal\nclaim_provenance: asserted\n---\n\nbody\n"), 0o644))
+	srv := mcp.NewServer(dir, nil, nil, nil)
+
+	resp := call(t, srv, "brain_edit", map[string]any{
+		"path": "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md", "old_str": "claim_provenance: asserted", "new_str": "claim_provenance: guessed",
+	})
+	require.Contains(t, resp, "error", "%v", resp)
+
+	got, err := os.ReadFile(note)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Contains(t, string(got), "claim_provenance: asserted", "rejected edit must leave the note byte-identical")
+}
+
+func TestBrainEdit_AllowsAValidClaimEnvelopeEdit(t *testing.T) {
+	dir := newBrainRepo(t)
+	note := filepath.Join(dir, "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md")
+	require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(note,
+		[]byte("---\ntitle: 'n'\nhalf_life: durable\napplies: universal\nclaim_provenance: asserted\n---\n\nbody\n"), 0o644))
+	srv := mcp.NewServer(dir, nil, nil, nil)
+
+	resp := call(t, srv, "brain_edit", map[string]any{
+		"path": "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md", "old_str": "half_life: durable", "new_str": "half_life: seasonal",
+	})
+	require.NotContains(t, resp, "error", "%v", resp)
+
+	got, err := os.ReadFile(note)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Contains(t, string(got), "half_life: seasonal")
+}
+
+func TestBrainEdit_UnrelatedEditsSkipTheEnvelopeCheckEntirely(t *testing.T) {
+	// The gate only engages when old_str/new_str actually mention an
+	// envelope field name — an ordinary body edit on a note that happens to
+	// carry a valid envelope must not pay for (or be affected by) a check
+	// that has nothing to do with it.
+	dir := newBrainRepo(t)
+	note := filepath.Join(dir, "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md")
+	require.NoError(t, os.WriteFile(note,
+		[]byte("---\ntitle: 'n'\nhalf_life: durable\napplies: universal\nclaim_provenance: asserted\n---\n\nold body\n"), 0o644))
+	srv := mcp.NewServer(dir, nil, nil, nil)
+
+	resp := call(t, srv, "brain_edit", map[string]any{
+		"path": "wiki/homelab/facts/n.md", "old_str": "old body", "new_str": "new body",
+	})
+	require.NotContains(t, resp, "error", "%v", resp)
+
+	got, err := os.ReadFile(note)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Contains(t, string(got), "new body")
+}
+
+func TestBrainEditRoot_GovernanceFilesAreNeverEnvelopeChecked(t *testing.T) {
+	// CLAUDE.md has no claim-envelope concept at all — the check must be
+	// scoped to notes (ScopeNotes), never applied on the governance path.
+	srv, _, _, _ := govServer(t)
+
+	resp := authCall(t, srv, "Bearer "+capStaticTok, "brain_edit_root", map[string]any{
+		"path": "CLAUDE.md", "old_str": "# rules", "new_str": "half_life: durable",
+	})
+	require.NotContains(t, resp, "error", "%v", resp)
+}
+
 func TestBrainEdit_RefusesGovernanceFilesFromTheModelFacingTool(t *testing.T) {
 	dir := newBrainRepo(t)
 	srv := mcp.NewServer(dir, nil, nil, nil)