First half of brain#21: the applicability envelope — half_life (volatile| seasonal|durable), applies (local|homelab|universal), and claim_provenance (asserted|inferred). The strength half (confidence, contested) follows once the ingest-time contradiction detector exists to populate it. writeHallNote already passed unknown frontmatter keys through verbatim, so preservation was free — a test now pins it so a refactor of the merge loop cannot silently drop the fields. What was missing is validation, and it fails closed: - a value outside the enum is rejected. An unvalidated value is worse than an absent one, because a lint skips what it cannot parse and the note then reads as classified while nothing acts on it; - an envelope field without claim_provenance is rejected. A value a model inferred must never be indistinguishable from one Mathias asserted — otherwise a single classifier pass launders machine guesses into apparent human judgement across 1113 notes, which is precisely how a weak claim hardens into accepted fact; - provenance without any envelope field is rejected too: it says who set fields that are not there. Validation runs before MkdirAll, so a rejected write leaves nothing behind — not even an empty hall directory. The field is `applies`, not `scope`, as brain#19 proposed: `scope:` has been in use since brain#5 for glossary terms (homelab-core, project:<repo>), a disjoint value space on the same key. The shipped schema keeps the name. Notes with none of these fields are byte-identical to before. Bulk backfill across the corpus stays out of scope — the same failure mode as the extraction pass that produced 28 wrong wikilinks out of 67. Schema documented in brain/CLAUDE.md (via brain_edit_root, which produced the #97 audit record for the rewrite). Refs brain#21, brain#19 (superseded), brain#5, hyperguild#97.