feat(doctor): report golangci-lint built with a Go older than GOROOT

Second recurrence of the same host fault (infra#375; first hit
openbanking-api 2026-09-03, then cobalt-dingo 2026-09-08). golangci-lint
embeds the go/types export-data reader from the Go it was BUILT with, so a
newer GOROOT makes it unable to decode the stdlib:

  panic: file requires newer Go version go1.27 (application built with go1.26)

An earlier form printed a typecheck error naming the user's own source file,
which sends people to debug code that is fine. It cost time in two repos before
anyone recognised it as a host fault rather than a repo fault.

CI never sees it — the runner image has matching versions — so it breaks
exactly the local `task check` that AGENT.md requires before every push, and
nothing else. The fix was always one reinstall; the missing thing was the
signal, which is what doctor is for.

Fails open by design: an unparseable version, or no Go at all, is a normal host
and not a fault doctor may assert. Version comparison is major.minor in POSIX
sh rather than sort -V, since this runs on macOS too and the export-data format
is minor-versioned.

Also makes the suite hermetic. The check reads the real host, so on a machine
whose golangci-lint is genuinely stale every unrelated fixture started failing.
The harness now prepends a matching fake pair for the whole file, and only the
four cases that opt in exercise the check.

Verified against koala, which is currently in exactly this state:

  FAIL toolchain: golangci-lint built with go1.26.1 but GOROOT is go1.27.0
       — lint panics on every Go repo; reinstall it under the current
       toolchain (infra#375)

doctor: 25 passed, 0 failed. Full suite green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "skills",
   "description": "Mathias's engineering skills library, plus the hooks and MCP servers that make it enforceable: TDD, clean code, debugging, specs, discovery, CI, and secret hygiene.",
-  "version": "0.10.2",
+  "version": "0.19.4",
   "author": {
     "name": "Mathias",
     "url": "https://git.d-ma.be/mathias"

.mcp.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "_comment": "Tailscale Serve on koala, not the public d-ma.be hostnames. The public path exits to Cloudflare and NPM to reach a k3s service on the same machine most sessions run on, which imposes rate limits and message-size caps on tool results. Serve terminates TLS with a real Tailscale cert and proxies to the NodePort over loopback, so traffic reaches the service from koala itself and satisfies the default-deny-ingress NetworkPolicy with no cluster change. Clients need 'tailscale set --accept-dns=true' for the MagicDNS name to resolve; see mathias/skills#24.",
+  "_comment": "Tailscale Serve on koala, not the public d-ma.be hostnames. The public path exits to Cloudflare and NPM to reach a k3s service on the same machine most sessions run on, which imposes rate limits and message-size caps on tool results. Serve terminates TLS with a real Tailscale cert and proxies to the NodePort over loopback, so traffic reaches the service from koala itself and satisfies the default-deny-ingress NetworkPolicy with no cluster change. Clients need 'tailscale set --accept-dns=true' for the MagicDNS name to resolve; see mathias/skills#24. Every ${VAR} below must be one ~/.op-env defines -- bin/check-mcp-env enforces that, because an undefined one sends an empty Authorization header and reports as 'requires authentication', which is indistinguishable from a revoked credential.",
   "mcpServers": {
     "brain": {
       "type": "http",
@@ -11,6 +11,24 @@
     "infra": {
       "type": "http",
       "url": "https://koala.tail30472e.ts.net:8444/mcp"
+    },
+    "gitea": {
+      "_comment": "gitea-mcp authenticates by PASS-THROUGH: the bearer is a Gitea PAT, which the server validates against Gitea and then acts as. So no dedicated MCP token is needed, and the AgentSecrets blocker that parked this entry (skills#32, #33) never applied to it -- DMABE_GITEA_API_TOKEN is op://HomeLab and already in the session environment. Verified 2026-09-07: initialize 200 (serverInfo gitea-mcp) and tools/list returns 41 tools. Two DIFFERENT PATs both authenticate while GITEA_MCP_TOKEN 401s, which is what proves this is pass-through validation and not a static-token comparison.",
+      "type": "http",
+      "url": "https://koala.tail30472e.ts.net:8446/mcp",
+      "headers": {
+        "Authorization": "Bearer ${DMABE_GITEA_API_TOKEN}"
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "_parked": {
+    "_reason": "cad is proxied, reachable and AUTHENTICATING: tailscale serve 8445 -> 127.0.0.1:31877, and an MCP initialize with the correct bearer returns 200 (serverInfo cad aed2aaf). It stays parked only because nothing puts CAD_MCP_TOKEN into the session environment. It lives in the 1Password AgentSecrets vault, and by deliberate design (infra#224, closed) no single identity on koala reads both vaults: koala-homelab is HomeLab-only and resolves ~/.op-env, koala-agentsecrets-write is AgentSecrets-only and lives in ~/.op-agent-write.env. Adding an AgentSecrets reference to ~/.op-env does NOT degrade gracefully -- `op run` fails wholesale and every other token, BRAIN_MCP_TOKEN included, goes unresolved with it. Enabling needs a read-scoped AgentSecrets identity in the session-env path; see mathias/skills#32, #33. gitea was parked here for the same stated reason and has been unparked: it needs no AgentSecrets token at all, because gitea-mcp is pass-through-authenticated.",
+    "cad": {
+      "type": "http",
+      "url": "https://koala.tail30472e.ts.net:8445/mcp",
+      "headers": {
+        "Authorization": "Bearer ${CAD_MCP_TOKEN}"
+      }
     }
   }
 }

README.md

@@ -100,9 +100,11 @@ default to point into `~/dev`.
 | `AGENTS_SKILLS_DIR` | `$HOME/.agents/skills` |
 | `CRUSH_SKILLS_DIR` | `$HOME/.config/crush/skills` |
 | `OPENCODE_SKILLS_DIR` | `$HOME/.config/opencode/skills` |
+| `ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON` | `$HOME/.gemini/config/skills.json` (registers `AGENTS_SKILLS_DIR` as a path entry; needs `jq`) |
 | `SKILLS_EXTRA_SOURCES` | unset (colon-separated extra source directories) |
 
-Antigravity and Mistral Vibe targets were removed — unused.
+The Mistral Vibe target was removed — unused. Antigravity's was removed for
+the same reason and re-added once it came back into use.
 
 ## Checking a host
 
@@ -110,10 +112,25 @@ Antigravity and Mistral Vibe targets were removed — unused.
 task doctor      # or bin/doctor
 ```
 
-Reports dangling links, links resolving into a foreign checkout, skill-count
+Reports dangling links, links into a source nobody configured, skills in the
-mismatches, stray entries, and leftover per-skill Claude symlinks. Non-zero
+checkout with no link, stray entries, leftover per-skill Claude symlinks, and a
-exit on drift. It also runs at session start via the plugin, so a drifting
+Claude Code plugin sitting on an older generation than the host already has.
-host says so rather than waiting to be discovered.
+Non-zero exit on drift. It also runs at session start via the plugin, so a
+drifting host says so rather than waiting to be discovered.
+
+All of that compares copies already on the machine — deliberately, since it
+runs in a session hook where latency shows. That leaves one case invisible: a
+host where the checkout, the marketplace clone and the installed plugin all
+agree, and all three are a release behind origin.
+
+```bash
+task doctor -- --online     # or bin/doctor --online
+```
+
+One `git ls-remote` against origin, opt-in. Belongs in a scheduled per-host job,
+not the session hook. An unreachable remote is reported as its own fault rather
+than as staleness — "I could not check" and "you are behind" are different
+answers and only one of them is about the host.
 
 ## Versioning
 
@@ -130,13 +147,48 @@ before `task skills:install`; default is `main` for always-current.
 
 ## Contributing a skill
 
-1. Add a directory `<short-kebab-name>/`.
+1. Add a directory `skills/<short-kebab-name>/`.
-2. Create `<short-kebab-name>/SKILL.md` — start with one-paragraph
+2. Create `skills/<short-kebab-name>/SKILL.md` with this frontmatter — all four
-   purpose, then triggers ("use when …"), then mechanics.
+   keys are gated by `task check`, and the index table is generated from the
-3. Add a row to `SKILLS_INDEX.md` (description + use-when).
+   last three:
-4. Commit directly to `main`. Conventional-commit prefix
+
+   ```yaml
+   ---
+   name: <short-kebab-name>
+   surfaces: [claude-code, library]   # any of claude-code | library | chat
+   summary: "<one line for the index table>"
+   use_when: "<the trigger, for the index table>"
+   description: <the paragraph the model selects on>
+   ---
+   ```
+
+   Then: one-paragraph purpose, triggers ("use when …"), mechanics.
+3. Run `task index` and commit the regenerated `SKILLS_INDEX.md`. Do **not**
+   hand-edit the table — `task check` regenerates it and fails on a diff.
+4. Pressure-test it before shipping: run the scenario against a subagent that
+   does *not* have the skill, write the skill against what that run actually
+   did, then re-run with it. See `superpowers-writing-skills` and #19.
+5. Commit directly to `main`. Conventional-commit prefix
    (`feat:` / `fix:` / `docs:`). Add `Bump-Type: minor` footer when
    adding a new skill or expanding scope; default patch covers edits.
 
 This repo is markdown-only and public — never include secrets, client
 names, or anything under NDA in a skill.
+
+## Mode 2 routing candidates
+
+These notes used to sit in each SKILL.md as a `## Mode 2 Routing Note` section.
+They changed nothing about how the skill is invoked — several said so outright —
+and cost context on every load, so they live here instead. Nothing in the repo
+depends on this table; it is a record of which skills looked mechanical enough
+to route to a local model, should a routing layer ever exist.
+
+| Skill | Note |
+|---|---|
+| `cad-babysit` | Phases 2-4 (reading comments/logs, classifying fault vs outcome) are judgment-heavy and should stay Mode 1. Phase 1 (running `cad stuck` and grouping its output) is mechanical and a Mode 2 routing candidate once Plan 6 ships the routing pod. |
+| `code-review` | This skill is invoked identically in Mode 1 (cloud Claude) and Mode 2 (client-local with supervisor routing). The routing layer (Plan 6) does not exist yet; treat this skill as Mode 1 only for now. Findings format and severity classification are unchanged across modes. |
+| `debug` | This skill produces high-volume mechanical output (hypothesis enumeration) and is a candidate for Mode 2 routing to a local model in the future. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only. The hypothesis format and discipline are identical regardless of which model generates them. |
+| `feature-spec` | Spec writing requires interpretation of intent and tradeoff reasoning — work where Claude generally outperforms a 9-13B local model. This skill is intentionally **not** a Mode 2 routing candidate. In Mode 2, the routing layer should leave `feature-spec` calls on Claude. |
+| `session-retrospective` | Reading long session logs and pulling themes is high-volume, mechanical pattern-recognition work — a strong Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only. |
+| `tdd` | This skill is invoked identically whether the agent is running in Mode 1 (cloud Claude, no routing) or Mode 2 (client-local, supervisor routing layer). The routing pod (Plan 6) does not exist yet; until it does, treat this skill as Mode 1 only. The discipline does not change between modes — only the model behind the call. |
+| `trainer` | Trainer is the same shape as `session-retrospective` — long-context reading, mechanical filtering — and is a Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6, treat as Mode 1 only. |

SKILLS_INDEX.md

@@ -9,18 +9,20 @@ the SKILL.md, not the table.
 <!-- BEGIN skills-table -->
 | Skill | Description | Use when | Surfaces |
 |-------|-------------|----------|----------|
+| `adr` | Architecture Decision Records — house format, and how to record a decision you cannot make yet | Recording an architectural decision; revisiting one; or deciding between options where the right answer genuinely is not knowable yet | claude-code, library |
 | `atdd` | Acceptance Test-Driven Development workflow | Feature development with acceptance criteria | claude-code, library |
 | `cad-babysit` | Focused human-in-the-loop session working CAD's stuck queue (read-only) | Picking up whatever `cad stuck` flags, with a human present | claude-code, library |
 | `clean-code` | Clean code principles with Go adaptation | Code review, refactoring, new code | claude-code, library |
 | `code-review` | Code smell detection + Go-specific checklist | Pre-merge review | claude-code, library |
 | `cognitive-load` | Cognitive complexity analysis (CLI score) | Identifying hotspots, before refactoring | claude-code, library |
-| `debug` | Hypothesis-first debugging discipline | Any test failure or bug whose cause is not immediately obvious | claude-code, library |
+| `debug` | Hypothesis-first debugging discipline | Any test failure or bug whose cause is not immediately obvious — or a bug report with no failure text, which this skill refuses rather than guesses at | claude-code, library |
 | `discovery-framing` | Problem-before-solution discovery/framing method | Framing/validating a problem before any solution; opportunity sizing | claude-code, library |
 | `dream` | Reflective consolidation pass over an agent's memory directory | Pruning/merging memory files, rebuilding a memory index | claude-code, library, chat |
 | `experiment-spec` | Rigorous experiment spec — falsifiable hypothesis, quantitative acceptance, null-result protocol | Scoping a research/ML phase instead of a feature | claude-code, library |
 | `feature-spec` | Implementation-level feature spec (tighter than spec-driven-dev) | Scoping one feature inside an already-specced project | claude-code, library |
 | `gitea-ci` | Gitea CI/CD pipeline with act_runner, buildah, k3s, GitHub mirror | Setting up or debugging CI on this infra | claude-code, library |
 | `grill-me` | Structured plan interrogation — Quick Poke, Full Grill, Pre-mortem | Stress-testing a plan before committing; end of Diamond 1; before promoting to pre-prod | claude-code, library, chat |
+| `lineage` | Backward decision archaeology — was this tried before, and does the reason it failed still hold | Before proposing something that feels new; when an idea keeps resurfacing; when you inherit code whose reason is gone | claude-code, library |
 | `own-the-task` | Delegation ownership — Intake → Brief → Plan → Execute | A task is handed over open-ended; \"take this off my plate\"; before a plan exists | claude-code, library, chat |
 | `planning` | Planning and task breakdown | Sprint planning, task decomposition | claude-code, library |
 | `playwright` | Playwright E2E testing — setup, HTMX patterns, SSE streams, CI wiring | Adding browser tests to any project with a web UI | claude-code, library |
@@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ the SKILL.md, not the table.
 | `tdd` | Test-Driven Development enforcement | Starting any new feature or fixing a bug | claude-code, library |
 | `telos-load` | Load TELOS intention substrate at session start | Starting any koala session; before architectural decisions; CAD pipeline entry | claude-code, library |
 | `test-design` | Dave Farley test design scoring (Farley Index) | Reviewing or writing tests | claude-code, library |
+| `traceability` | Forward trace — requirement to decision to commit to verification to release, and what cannot be checked | Proving why a change exists; auditing a claim; before an attestation or a compliance ask | claude-code, library |
 | `trainer` | Two-phase brain curation (score candidates, write past quality gate) | Periodic brain pruning and curation | claude-code, library |
 | `user-stories` | Elephant Carpaccio story slicing | Breaking down features | claude-code, library |
 | `web-shot` | Screenshot a running web UI via a koala k3s Playwright job | Visual verification of a running UI when no local browser exists | claude-code, library |

Taskfile.yml

@@ -110,7 +110,16 @@ tasks:
         #    harness instead of erroring.
         sh '{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}/bin/check-surfaces' '{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}' || fail=1
 
-        # 5. Plugin manifest version must match the latest tag, or installers
+        # 5. A documented session_log call must be one the tool would accept:
+        #    session_id is its only required field, and nine skills omitted it.
+        sh '{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}/bin/check-session-log' '{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}' || fail=1
+
+        # 6. Every skill says when it stops and hands back (#5). Skills whose
+        #    rule is not written yet are listed in bin/escalation-pending.txt,
+        #    which only shrinks.
+        sh '{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}/bin/check-escalation' '{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}' || fail=1
+
+        # 7. Plugin manifest version must match the latest tag, or installers
         #    never see the update (Claude Code gates updates on this field).
         if [ -f '{{.PLUGIN_MANIFEST}}' ]; then
           manifest_v=$(sed -n 's/.*"version"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p' '{{.PLUGIN_MANIFEST}}' | head -1)
@@ -129,6 +138,26 @@ tasks:
           echo "ERROR: missing .claude-plugin/plugin.json" >&2; fail=1
         fi
 
+        # Every ${VAR} a live .mcp.json server interpolates must be one the
+        # session env-file defines. An undefined one is silent: the header
+        # goes out empty and the server reports "requires authentication",
+        # which reads as a revoked credential. Exit 2 means the check could
+        # not run (no jq, or no env-file — CI has neither); that is reported
+        # and not fatal, but it is never treated as a pass.
+        if [ -x "{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}/bin/check-mcp-env" ]; then
+          # `|| rc=$?` is load-bearing, not style. Task runs this block under
+          # `sh -e`, so a bare invocation exiting non-zero kills the shell
+          # before `case` is reached -- the tolerance below never ran, and the
+          # gate died with `exit status 2` on the commit that added it.
+          rc=0
+          "{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}/bin/check-mcp-env" "{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}/.mcp.json" "$HOME/.op-env" || rc=$?
+          case $rc in
+            0) ;;
+            2) echo "NOTE: MCP env wiring unverified on this host" >&2 ;;
+            *) fail=1 ;;
+          esac
+        fi
+
         if [ $fail -ne 0 ]; then
           echo "check FAILED" >&2; exit 1
         fi

bin/check-escalation

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# check-escalation — every skill states when it stops and hands back.
+#
+# #5 decided this belongs in the body, not the frontmatter: no harness reads
+# frontmatter beyond name/description, so a `failure_criteria:` key would be a
+# guarantee nothing honours. The model reads the body.
+#
+# #37 then had to define which skills need one, and every obvious answer was
+# bad: a hardcoded list rots, sniffing the text for "does it write anything" is
+# unfalsifiable, and a frontmatter flag is the rejected option wearing a hat.
+#
+# So there is no acting set. EVERY skill answers the question. A read-only skill
+# answers it in one line — "read-only; findings are the output, nothing is
+# handed back" — which turns an absence into a claim someone can disagree with.
+#
+# bin/escalation-pending.txt is a ratchet for skills whose real rule has not
+# been written yet (a stop condition nobody thought about is not worth
+# enforcing). It is self-cleaning: a listed skill that HAS a section fails, so
+# the list cannot outlive its reason.
+#
+# Usage: check-escalation [checkout-root]
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=${1:-$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)}
+PENDING="$ROOT/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+fail=0
+
+listed() {
+  [ -f "$PENDING" ] || return 1
+  sed 's/#.*//' "$PENDING" | grep -qx "[[:space:]]*$1[[:space:]]*"
+}
+
+for dir in "$ROOT"/skills/*/; do
+  [ -f "$dir/SKILL.md" ] || continue
+  name=$(basename "$dir")
+
+  if grep -q '^## Escalation' "$dir/SKILL.md"; then
+    if listed "$name"; then
+      echo "ERROR: skills/$name has an Escalation section but is still in bin/escalation-pending.txt — remove it from the list" >&2
+      fail=1
+    fi
+    continue
+  fi
+
+  listed "$name" && continue
+  echo "ERROR: skills/$name has no '## Escalation' section — say when it stops and hands back, or say it never does" >&2
+  fail=1
+done
+
+# A pending entry for a skill that no longer exists is a stale exemption, and a
+# stale exemption is how a gate quietly stops covering something. Looped without
+# a pipe on purpose: a `while read` on the right of a pipe runs in a subshell,
+# so `fail=1` would be set in a process that exits before it is read.
+if [ -f "$PENDING" ]; then
+  entries=$(sed 's/#.*//' "$PENDING" | tr -d '[:blank:]' | grep -v '^$' || true)
+  for entry in $entries; do
+    [ -f "$ROOT/skills/$entry/SKILL.md" ] && continue
+    echo "ERROR: bin/escalation-pending.txt lists '$entry', which has no skills/$entry/SKILL.md" >&2
+    fail=1
+  done
+fi
+
+# --- the ratchet must actually ratchet ---------------------------------------
+# "This list only shrinks" was asserted in five places and enforced in none. A
+# traceability probe falsified it in one run: add an unsectioned skill, append it
+# to the list, gate returns 0. So compare against the list as committed at HEAD —
+# a convention nothing checks is a convention, and this repo has spent a day on
+# what those cost.
+if [ -f "$PENDING" ]; then
+  if ! git -C "$ROOT" rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+    echo "WARN: $ROOT is not a git checkout — cannot verify the pending list only shrank" >&2
+  elif ! git -C "$ROOT" cat-file -e HEAD:bin/escalation-pending.txt 2>/dev/null; then
+    : # first commit introducing the file — nothing to compare against yet
+  else
+    before=$(git -C "$ROOT" show HEAD:bin/escalation-pending.txt 2>/dev/null \
+      | sed 's/#.*//' | tr -d '[:blank:]' | grep -v '^$' | sort -u || true)
+    now=$(sed 's/#.*//' "$PENDING" | tr -d '[:blank:]' | grep -v '^$' | sort -u || true)
+    added=$(printf '%s\n' "$now" | grep -vxF "$before" 2>/dev/null || true)
+    for entry in $added; do
+      [ -n "$entry" ] || continue
+      echo "ERROR: '$entry' was added to bin/escalation-pending.txt — the list only shrinks. Write its '## Escalation' section instead of exempting it." >&2
+      fail=1
+    done
+  fi
+fi
+
+exit $fail

bin/check-mcp-env

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# check-mcp-env — assert every variable a live MCP server interpolates is one
+# the session env-file actually defines.
+#
+# Why this is a gate and not a comment: the failure is silent. A header of
+# "Bearer ${FOO}" where FOO is undefined does not error -- it goes out empty,
+# the server answers 401, and Claude Code reports "requires authentication",
+# which reads exactly like a revoked credential. On 2026-09-07 that cost a
+# full investigation on koala before the credential turned out to be fine.
+#
+# Servers under `_parked` are exempt by design. Parked means "reachable, but
+# nothing puts its token in the environment yet" -- flagging those would
+# report the intended state as a fault.
+#
+# Usage:  check-mcp-env <mcp.json> <env-file>
+#
+# Exit 0  every live server's variables are defined
+#      1  at least one is not, named on stderr
+#      2  could not verify (bad usage, unreadable input, jq absent).
+#         Deliberately distinct from 0: an unverified config is not a clean
+#         one, and a gate that cannot run should say so rather than pass.
+
+set -u
+
+CONFIG=${1:-}
+ENVFILE=${2:-}
+
+if [ -z "$CONFIG" ] || [ -z "$ENVFILE" ]; then
+  echo "usage: check-mcp-env <mcp.json> <env-file>" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+
+if ! command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  echo "SKIP: jq not installed -- MCP env wiring unverified" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+
+if [ ! -f "$CONFIG" ]; then
+  echo "ERROR: no such config: $CONFIG" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+
+if [ ! -f "$ENVFILE" ]; then
+  # EXPECTED IN CI, and permanently so. The env-file holds live credentials, so
+  # it is not on the runner and must not be -- which means this check can only
+  # ever verify on a host that has one. infra#368 added jq to the runner image
+  # believing that would let CI verify; it removed the jq branch below and
+  # changed nothing else, because this branch is the binding one.
+  #
+  # Said plainly so nobody concludes CI covers this. It does not, it cannot,
+  # and putting ~/.op-env on the runner to make it would be trading a real
+  # secret for a green tick.
+  echo "ERROR: no such env-file: $ENVFILE -- cannot verify MCP variables" >&2
+  echo "       (expected in CI: this check only verifies on a host with ~/.op-env)" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+
+# Every "<server>\t<VAR>" pair a live server interpolates. `..` walks the whole
+# value, so a variable is found wherever it is placed, not only under headers.
+refs=$(jq -r '
+  .mcpServers // {}
+  | to_entries[]
+  | .key as $server
+  | (.value | .. | strings)
+  | select(test("\\$\\{"))
+  | [ scan("\\$\\{([A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*)\\}")[] ]
+  | .[]
+  | "\($server)\t\(.)"
+' "$CONFIG" 2>/dev/null) || {
+  echo "ERROR: $CONFIG is not valid JSON -- MCP env wiring unverified" >&2
+  exit 2
+}
+
+if [ -z "$refs" ]; then
+  echo "check-mcp-env: no interpolated variables in live servers"
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+fail=0
+checked=0
+for pair in $(printf '%s\n' "$refs" | tr '\t' ':'); do
+  server=${pair%%:*}
+  var=${pair#*:}
+  checked=$((checked + 1))
+  if grep -qE "^[[:space:]]*(export[[:space:]]+)?$var=" "$ENVFILE"; then
+    continue
+  fi
+  printf 'ERROR: MCP server %s interpolates %s, which %s does not define.\n' \
+    "$server" "$var" "$ENVFILE" >&2
+  printf '       It will send an empty Authorization header and report as "requires authentication".\n' >&2
+  fail=1
+done
+
+if [ "$fail" -ne 0 ]; then
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+printf 'check-mcp-env: %d interpolated variable(s) across live MCP servers, all defined in %s\n' \
+  "$checked" "$ENVFILE"

bin/check-session-log

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# check-session-log — a skill that documents a session_log call must document a
+# call the tool would actually accept.
+#
+# Nine skills documented the payload and none named `session_id`, which is the
+# tool's only REQUIRED field. An agent following any of them either failed the
+# call or invented an id — and invented ids do not group, so the pass-rate the
+# endpoint computes was being assembled from entries that could not be joined
+# (#36, found by a pressure test against `debug`).
+#
+# Also rejected: `duration_ms: <wall-clock>`. An agent does not observe a clock.
+# A documented field nobody can honestly populate gets fabricated or silently
+# dropped, and fabricated numbers in a metrics stream are worse than no numbers.
+#
+# Usage: check-session-log [checkout-root]
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=${1:-$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)}
+fail=0
+
+for dir in "$ROOT"/skills/*/; do
+  [ -f "$dir/SKILL.md" ] || continue
+  name=$(basename "$dir")
+
+  grep -q 'session_log' "$dir/SKILL.md" || continue
+
+  # Read the PAYLOAD, not the file. The first version of this gate grepped the
+  # whole SKILL.md for "session_id", so a payload missing the field passed as
+  # long as the word appeared anywhere — including in prose explaining that the
+  # field is required. A traceability probe demonstrated it in one sed.
+  payloads=$(grep -n 'session_log' "$dir/SKILL.md" | grep '{' || true)
+
+  if [ -z "$payloads" ]; then
+    # Mentions the tool but documents no call. Nothing to check, and nothing to
+    # get wrong.
+    continue
+  fi
+
+  printf '%s\n' "$payloads" | while IFS= read -r line; do
+    [ -n "$line" ] || continue
+    body=$(printf '%s' "$line" | sed 's/^[0-9]*://')
+    lineno=$(printf '%s' "$line" | cut -d: -f1)
+
+    printf '%s' "$body" | grep -q 'session_id' \
+      || echo "ERROR: skills/$name:$lineno documents a session_log payload with no session_id — the tool's only required field" >&2
+
+    # Any spelling of the key, quoted or not, followed by anything that is not a
+    # bare number. A placeholder nobody can fill gets fabricated or dropped; a
+    # real measurement is fine.
+    if printf '%s' "$body" | grep -Eq '"?duration_ms"?[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^0-9,}[:space:]]'; then
+      echo "ERROR: skills/$name:$lineno documents duration_ms as something other than a real measurement — an agent does not observe a clock; omit it" >&2
+    fi
+  done > "$ROOT/.session_log_errors.$$" 2>&1
+
+  if [ -s "$ROOT/.session_log_errors.$$" ]; then
+    cat "$ROOT/.session_log_errors.$$" >&2
+    fail=1
+  fi
+  rm -f "$ROOT/.session_log_errors.$$"
+done
+
+exit $fail

bin/doctor

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #   doctor            human report, non-zero exit on drift
 #   doctor --quiet    print only when something is wrong (SessionStart hook)
 #   doctor --json     machine-readable findings
+#   doctor --online   ALSO ask origin for the latest tag (one network call)
 #
 # POSIX sh on purpose: it runs on macOS and Linux, before any toolchain is
 # guaranteed present, and inside a session-start hook where latency shows.
@@ -21,10 +22,12 @@ set -u
 
 QUIET=0
 JSON=0
+ONLINE=0
 for arg in "$@"; do
   case "$arg" in
     --quiet)  QUIET=1 ;;
     --json)   JSON=1 ;;
+    --online) ONLINE=1 ;;
     -h|--help)
       sed -n '2,20p' "$0" | sed 's/^# \{0,1\}//'
       exit 0 ;;
@@ -288,6 +291,80 @@ if [ -n "$installed_v" ] && [ -n "$available_v" ] && [ "$installed_v" != "$avail
   add FAIL plugin-version "Claude Code has skills@mathias $installed_v installed but $available_v is available on this host — /plugin update skills@mathias (a host stale enough to matter is running the old doctor, so the first detection may need this run by hand)"
 fi
 
+# --- optional: the release this host has never fetched ----------------------
+# Every check above compares copies already present, so a host whose checkout,
+# marketplace clone and installed plugin all agree reads as clean while sitting
+# a release behind origin (#38). Closing that needs a network call, which the
+# default run must not make — hence opt-in, for a scheduled per-host job rather
+# than the SessionStart hook.
+#
+# $DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD is the test seam; it prints the newest remote tag.
+if [ "$ONLINE" -eq 1 ]; then
+  if [ -n "${DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD:-}" ]; then
+    remote_tag=$(eval "$DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD" 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | tr -d '[:space:]')
+  else
+    # The URL is never printed: a remote rewritten by url.insteadOf can expand
+    # into a live token.
+    origin=$(git -C "$CHECKOUT" config --get remote.origin.url 2>/dev/null || true)
+    if [ -n "$origin" ]; then
+      remote_tag=$(git ls-remote --tags --refs "$origin" 2>/dev/null \
+        | sed 's#.*refs/tags/##' | sort -t. -k1,1n -k2,2n -k3,3n | tail -1 | tr -d '[:space:]')
+    else
+      remote_tag=''
+    fi
+  fi
+
+  if [ -z "$remote_tag" ]; then
+    # Not drift. A host that cannot reach origin has an unanswered question,
+    # not a stale library, and saying otherwise would make the two look alike.
+    add WARN offline "could not reach origin for the latest tag — this run proves nothing about staleness"
+  else
+    remote_v=${remote_tag#v}
+    if [ -n "$available_v" ] && [ "$remote_v" != "$available_v" ] \
+       && [ "$(newer_version "$available_v" "$remote_v")" = "$remote_v" ]; then
+      add FAIL behind "this host has $available_v; origin has released $remote_v — run 'task update' and '/plugin update skills@mathias'"
+    fi
+  fi
+fi
+
+# --- toolchain: golangci-lint must be built with Go >= GOROOT ---------------
+# infra#375, second recurrence. golangci-lint embeds the go/types export-data
+# reader from the Go it was BUILT with. When GOROOT is newer, that reader
+# cannot decode the stdlib and the linter dies:
+#
+#   panic: file requires newer Go version go1.27 (application built with go1.26)
+#
+# An earlier form printed a typecheck error naming the user's own file, which
+# sends people to debug code that is fine. It cost time in two repos before
+# anyone recognised it as a host fault rather than a repo fault.
+#
+# It is invisible to CI -- the runner image has matching versions -- so it
+# breaks exactly the local `task check` that AGENT.md requires before a push,
+# and nothing else. That is why it belongs in doctor: the signal was missing,
+# not the fix.
+#
+# Fails open on anything unparseable. A host with no Go toolchain is a normal
+# host, not a broken one, and doctor runs in a SessionStart hook everywhere.
+ver_lt() {
+  # 0 when $1 < $2 on major.minor. Deliberately not sort -V: this is POSIX sh
+  # that also runs on macOS, and the export-data format is minor-versioned, so
+  # patch level does not enter into it.
+  _a=${1%%.*}; _ar=${1#*.}; _am=${_ar%%.*}
+  _b=${2%%.*}; _br=${2#*.}; _bm=${_br%%.*}
+  case "$_a$_am$_b$_bm" in *[!0-9]*) return 1 ;; esac
+  [ "$_a" -lt "$_b" ] && return 0
+  [ "$_a" -gt "$_b" ] && return 1
+  [ "$_am" -lt "$_bm" ]
+}
+
+if command -v golangci-lint >/dev/null 2>&1 && command -v go >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  lint_go=$(golangci-lint --version 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/.*built with go\([0-9][0-9.]*\).*/\1/p' | head -1)
+  root_go=$(go version 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/.*go version go\([0-9][0-9.]*\).*/\1/p' | head -1)
+  if [ -n "$lint_go" ] && [ -n "$root_go" ] && ver_lt "$lint_go" "$root_go"; then
+    add FAIL toolchain "golangci-lint built with go$lint_go but GOROOT is go$root_go — lint panics on every Go repo; reinstall it under the current toolchain (infra#375)"
+  fi
+fi
+
 # --- output -----------------------------------------------------------------
 if [ "$JSON" -eq 1 ]; then
   printf '{"checkout":"%s","expected":%s,"plugin":{"installed":"%s","available":"%s"},"findings":[%s]}\n' \

bin/escalation-pending.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Skills whose escalation rule has not been written yet (#37).
+#
+# This list only shrinks. A skill here is exempt from the '## Escalation'
+# requirement until someone writes its real stop conditions; a skill that HAS a
+# section and is still listed fails the gate, so the list cannot outlive its
+# reason.
+#
+# The ones already done were the advisory and read-only skills, where the honest
+# answer is a line. What is left is the acting set — skills that write files,
+# dispatch agents, touch credentials or move releases — and each of those needs
+# a rule someone thought about, not a rote paragraph. Per #19, one at a time.
+
+atdd
+dream
+experiment-spec
+feature-spec
+gitea-ci
+own-the-task
+planning
+playwright
+problem-analysis
+refactoring
+regulatory-risk-assessment
+secret-hygiene
+session-retrospective
+spec-driven-dev
+superpowers-brainstorming
+superpowers-dispatching-parallel-agents
+superpowers-executing-plans
+superpowers-finishing-a-development-branch
+superpowers-receiving-code-review
+superpowers-requesting-code-review
+superpowers-subagent-driven-development
+superpowers-using-git-worktrees
+superpowers-using-superpowers
+superpowers-verification-before-completion
+superpowers-writing-plans
+superpowers-writing-skills
+tdd
+trainer
+user-stories
+web-shot

install.sh

@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
 #   /plugin install skills@mathias
 #
 # That path carries the hooks and MCP server definitions too, which symlinks
-# cannot. This script covers the harnesses with no plugin system: Crush, Pi
+# cannot. This script covers the harnesses with no plugin system: Crush, Pi,
-# and OpenCode.
+# OpenCode, and Antigravity.
 #
 # Wiring model — one managed directory, one link per harness:
 #
@@ -27,6 +27,13 @@
 #   ~/.config/crush/skills      -> ~/.agents/skills
 #   ~/.config/opencode/skills   -> ~/.agents/skills
 #
+# Antigravity has no symlink-directory discovery — it reads a path-entries
+# JSON instead (~/.gemini/config/skills.json:
+# {"entries":[{"path":"..."}]}). One entry points at ~/.agents/skills, so it
+# sees exactly the same surfaces-filtered, collision-resolved set every other
+# harness does. Requires jq; skipped with a warning if jq is unavailable —
+# every other target in this script stays dependency-free on purpose.
+#
 # ~/.agents/skills was itself a link to this checkout until #27. That encoded
 # an assumption nobody had stated — that this checkout is the ONLY source of
 # skills on the host — and on flamingo the only way to install this library
@@ -53,7 +60,12 @@ CHECKOUT_DIR="${SKILLS_CHECKOUT_DIR:-$HOME/.local/share/skills}"
 AGENTS_DIR="${AGENTS_SKILLS_DIR:-$HOME/.agents/skills}"
 CRUSH_DIR="${CRUSH_SKILLS_DIR:-$HOME/.config/crush/skills}"
 OPENCODE_DIR="${OPENCODE_SKILLS_DIR:-$HOME/.config/opencode/skills}"
+ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON="${ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON:-$HOME/.gemini/config/skills.json}"
 EXTRA_SOURCES="${SKILLS_EXTRA_SOURCES:-}"
+# Overridable so the jq-absent branch is testable on a host that has jq. That
+# branch is a contract, not a fallback: jq is optional here while every other
+# target in this script is dependency-free.
+JQ="${SKILLS_JQ:-jq}"
 # Recorded beside the managed directory rather than inside it: a stray file in
 # there would look like a skill to every harness reading the dir.
 SOURCES_MANIFEST="$(dirname "$AGENTS_DIR")/$(basename "$AGENTS_DIR")-sources"
@@ -213,6 +225,42 @@ link_dir() {
   log "linked $link → $target"
 }
 
+# wire_antigravity — register $AGENTS_DIR in Antigravity's skills.json.
+# Merges rather than overwrites: skills.json is a documented user-editable
+# config (json_configs.md), so a hand-added entry (e.g. a personal skills
+# dir) must survive a re-run untouched.
+wire_antigravity() {
+  if ! command -v "$JQ" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+    log "Antigravity: jq not found — skipping (needed to merge $ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON safely)"
+    return
+  fi
+
+  local existing already updated
+  mkdir -p "$(dirname "$ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON")"
+
+  if [ -s "$ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON" ]; then
+    existing="$(cat "$ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON")"
+  else
+    existing='{}'
+  fi
+
+  already="$(printf '%s' "$existing" | "$JQ" --arg p "$AGENTS_DIR" \
+    '[.entries // [] | .[] | select(.path == $p)] | length' 2>/dev/null)" || {
+    log "Antigravity: $ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON is not valid JSON — leaving it untouched"
+    return 1
+  }
+
+  if [ "$already" -gt 0 ]; then
+    log "Antigravity: $AGENTS_DIR already registered in $ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON"
+    return
+  fi
+
+  updated="$(printf '%s' "$existing" | "$JQ" --arg p "$AGENTS_DIR" \
+    '.entries = ((.entries // []) + [{path: $p}])')"
+  printf '%s\n' "$updated" > "$ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON"
+  log "Antigravity: registered $AGENTS_DIR in $ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON"
+}
+
 main() {
   ensure_checkout
 
@@ -224,6 +272,7 @@ main() {
 
   link_dir "$CRUSH_DIR" "$AGENTS_DIR"
   link_dir "$OPENCODE_DIR" "$AGENTS_DIR"
+  wire_antigravity
 
   log "done — $LINKED_COUNT skill(s) linked from $(sources | wc -l | tr -d ' ') source(s), ref=$REF"
   log "Claude Code: install the plugin instead — /plugin marketplace add $REPO_URL"

skills/adr/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+---
+name: adr
+surfaces: [claude-code, library]
+summary: "Architecture Decision Records — house format, and how to record a decision you cannot make yet"
+use_when: "Recording an architectural decision; revisiting one; or deciding between options where the right answer genuinely is not knowable yet"
+description: Write an Architecture Decision Record in this estate's format — YAML frontmatter, Status/Context/Decision/Consequences/Validation — including the case where the tradeoff is genuinely context-dependent and forcing a resolution would be worse than preserving the tension. Use when recording or superseding an architectural decision, or when a decision keeps getting re-litigated because nobody wrote down why.
+---
+
+# ADR
+
+## Overview
+
+An ADR is the *record* of a decision — the artifact someone reads in eight months when
+they are about to undo it without knowing why it exists. It does not confer the decision;
+a person with authority does that, and this skill never is that person.
+
+Two things make one useful, and neither is the prose quality: a **format consistent
+enough to grep across repos**, and an honest account of **what was not decided**.
+
+## Before you write
+
+Both of these change what goes in the ADR, so they are not cross-references, they are
+steps:
+
+1. **`lineage`** — was this decided before and reversed? The reason it was dropped is
+   usually the most valuable sentence in your Context, and if an earlier ADR exists,
+   yours supersedes it rather than ignoring it.
+2. **`grill-me`** (Full Grill) — find the hole now. It is cheaper here than in the
+   Consequences section of the ADR that supersedes yours.
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Any choice where a reasonable alternative existed and was not taken
+- Superseding or amending an earlier ADR (never edit the old one — see Status)
+- A decision that keeps getting re-litigated, which means the reasoning was never recorded
+- A tradeoff that is genuinely context-dependent — see *Preserving a productive tension*
+
+**Do not use for:** implementation choices with no alternative worth naming, or anything
+a code comment answers. An ADR per function is an ADR nobody reads.
+
+## The format
+
+**Where it goes:** `docs/adr/NNNN-kebab-slug.md`, zero-padded to four digits, numbered
+sequentially within the repo. Frontmatter you cannot locate is not greppable, and half
+the value of the format is that `docs/adr/*` is a known path in every repo here.
+
+**The number is repo-local.** `cad` ADR-0002 and `infra` ADR-0002 are different
+documents. When referring across repos — including in `supersedes` — qualify it:
+`cad#0002`. Within a repo the bare number is fine.
+
+Frontmatter first. It exists so the corpus is machine-readable — "which ADRs does 0004
+supersede", "what is still `proposed`" — and a bespoke header block, however well
+written, cannot answer those.
+
+```markdown
+---
+adr:           0004
+title:         <the decision, as a sentence — not "database choice">
+status:        proposed | accepted | superseded | amended
+date:          2026-08-29
+deciders:      <who accepted it, by name — or "pending: <name>" (QUOTED) while proposed>
+supersedes:    <adr number, or null>
+---
+
+# ADR-0004 — <same title>
+
+## Status
+
+**The frontmatter is authoritative for status and date.** This section exists for the one
+thing the frontmatter cannot hold: *why* it moved — what superseded it and on what
+evidence, or what accepting it was contingent on. If it would only restate the YAML,
+delete it.
+
+## Context
+
+The forces. What is true that makes this a decision rather than a default — constraints,
+the failure that prompted it, what was tried. Name the unknowns explicitly; a decision
+made under uncertainty is not weaker for saying so, it is auditable.
+
+## Decision
+
+One sentence of what was decided, then why *this* option rather than the named
+alternatives. Address the strongest case against, not the weakest.
+
+## Consequences
+
+**Positive:** what this buys.
+
+**Negative / watch:** what it costs, and the specific thing to watch that would tell you
+it was wrong. "Some added complexity" is not a consequence; "the event schema is now the
+coupling surface between cad and every executor — version it deliberately" is.
+
+## Validation
+
+How you will know. A link to the experiment or the metric that proves or kills it, and
+the condition that fires a revisit. An ADR with no validation section is a preference
+with a template around it.
+```
+
+### The frontmatter must actually parse
+
+It exists to be machine-read, so a block that does not load is worse than no block at
+all: it drops that ADR silently out of every "what is still open?" query, while looking
+correct. Two shapes this template used to suggest are invalid YAML, and both were found
+live in the estate on 2026-09-05 — `openbanking-api` ADR-0001 and `infra` ADR-0019, each
+copied verbatim from here:
+
+| Wrong | Why | Right |
+|---|---|---|
+| `supersedes:    -` | a bare dash is a YAML *sequence entry*, not a string | `supersedes:    null` |
+| `deciders:      pending: Mathias` | the second, unquoted colon reads as a nested mapping | `deciders:      "pending: Mathias"` |
+
+Check before committing:
+
+```sh
+python3 -c "import yaml,sys;yaml.safe_load(open(sys.argv[1]).read().split('---')[1]);print('ok')" docs/adr/0004-*.md
+```
+
+## Preserving a productive tension
+
+Some tradeoffs are not unresolved because nobody thought hard enough. They are
+context-dependent, the context is not settled, and picking now means picking blind.
+Forcing resolution there produces a confident record that is wrong half the time.
+
+Record the tension instead, in the Decision section:
+
+```markdown
+## Decision
+
+Provisional: **<option A>**, on this reasoning: <what makes it safe to pick now>.
+
+<The strongest case for the option you did NOT take, and why it does not win today. The
+plain format demands this and a preserved tension does not get an exemption — the whole
+point is that the loser is still live.>
+
+### The tension, preserved
+
+- **Option A** — <what it assumes, what it costs>
+- **Option B** — <what it assumes, what it costs>
+
+**What we do not know:** <the variable that decides it>
+
+**Preservation strategy:** <what we build now so BOTH stay reachable. This is the
+technical content of the ADR, not a one-liner — enumerate it. It is usually the part both
+options need anyway, which is often most of the work: the schema, the interface seam, the
+idempotency key. Name each piece and say which option it keeps alive.>
+
+**Resolution triggers:** <plural, and one per unknown. Two independent unknowns do not
+collapse into one condition, and a trigger may exist that neither unknown implies.>
+```
+
+Two rules keep this from becoming an excuse:
+
+1. **A preserved tension still ships a decision.** "We will decide later" is not one.
+   Prefer the option whose correctness does not depend on the unknown, say so, and mark
+   it provisional.
+
+   **When no such option exists** — and often none does, because a tension is productive
+   precisely when both options are hostage to the same unknown — do not manufacture a
+   reason that one of them is. That reads as reasoned and will not be re-examined, which
+   makes it worse than an honest arbitrary pick. Fall back, in order: the option that is
+   cheaper to reverse; the one with the lower switching cost given your preservation
+   strategy; the one already built. Then **say that is why you picked it.** "Chosen
+   because it is the cheaper mistake" is a real justification and an auditable one.
+2. **The resolution trigger must be observable by someone who is not you.** "When it
+   becomes a problem" is not a trigger. "When executor count passes five and they are all
+   long-lived services in one cluster" is. A trigger nobody can evaluate is a decision
+   that quietly becomes permanent.
+
+`cad`'s ADR-0001 does this informally under *"Known refinements (recorded, deliberately
+not built yet)"* — sovereignty deferred to a 3-class model *"until a client actually opts
+into an EU provider"*. That clause is the pattern: option, cost, and the event that
+forces the choice.
+
+## Status discipline
+
+- **Never edit an accepted ADR to change its decision.** Write a new one and set
+  `supersedes`. The record of what was believed, and when, is the whole value.
+- **Amend** for corrections that do not change the decision (a broken link, a clarified
+  consequence). Note the amendment inline with its date.
+- **`proposed` is not a parking space.** An ADR that sits proposed for a month *with no
+  named decider* is a decision nobody is making; either accept it provisionally or close
+  it as declined. With a named decider it is a decision waiting on a person, which is a
+  different thing and is chased rather than closed.
+
+## Anti-patterns
+
+| Anti-pattern | Why it fails |
+|---|---|
+| Consequences that are all positive | Then it was not a decision, it was an announcement |
+| "We chose X because it is better" | Names no alternative and no force; unfalsifiable |
+| Written after the code shipped | Reverse-engineers a justification. Record the reasoning while it is still contested |
+| One ADR amended repeatedly | Destroys the history the format exists to keep |
+| No Validation section | Nothing distinguishes a good decision from a lucky one |
+| A tension "resolved" by picking arbitrarily | The next person re-litigates it, having lost the reasoning |
+
+## Escalation
+
+Writes a file, so it acts — but it decides nothing.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the deciders are not you — which, for an agent, is always. An
+ADR records a decision someone with authority made; writing one to *create* that
+authority is how a preference acquires a document number.
+
+So the deliverable is a draft marked `proposed` with **the person who must accept it named
+in `deciders` as `pending: <name>`**, and that hand-back stated in the response, not left
+implied. Naming the decider is the escalation, not a formality — an unnamed one is how a
+proposal sits for a month.
+
+That is the intended state for an agent-authored ADR, and it is not the parking-space
+failure below: a `proposed` ADR with a named decider is waiting on someone; one without is
+waiting on nobody.
+
+Also stop when the Context cannot be written without inventing a constraint. A missing
+force means the decision has not been thought through yet, and an ADR built on an
+invented one is worse than none: it will be cited.
+
+## Cross-References
+
+- `lineage` and `grill-me` — see *Before you write*; they change the content, so they are
+  steps rather than references.
+- `spec-driven-dev` / `feature-spec` — an ADR is the *why*; a spec is the *what*. If you
+  are describing behaviour, you are writing a spec.

skills/cad-babysit/SKILL.md

@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ wrong" — it means "nothing on the known list is wrong."
 Call `session_log` once at the end of every phase to record the outcome.
 
 **At end of each phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "cad-babysit", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" |
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "cad-babysit", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" |
-  "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root:
+  "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root:
   "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Phases for this skill:** query, read-comments, read-actions-logs, classify-fault-vs-outcome,
@@ -247,12 +247,6 @@ decide
 - `fail` — the phase could not be completed (e.g. `cad stuck` errored, Gitea was unreachable).
 - `skip` — phase intentionally skipped (e.g. Phase 3 skipped because Phase 2 was conclusive).
 
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
-
-Phases 2-4 (reading comments/logs, classifying fault vs outcome) are judgment-heavy and should
-stay Mode 1. Phase 1 (running `cad stuck` and grouping its output) is mechanical and a Mode 2
-routing candidate once Plan 6 ships the routing pod.
-
 ## Cross-References
 
 - Depends on `mathias/cad#14`'s `cad stuck` query — this skill is the ritual around it, not a
@@ -264,3 +258,13 @@ routing candidate once Plan 6 ships the routing pod.
 - `mathias/cad-atlas#11` renders the same `cad stuck` output as a pipeline overlay — read that
   instead of this skill's text output when a visual "where is everything stuck" view is wanted
   over working one row in depth.
+
+## Escalation
+
+Read-only by construction, and the Iron Laws above are the escalation rule: never close
+an issue, never dispatch, never write a label. Everything that is the operator's call
+leaves as a `DECISION NEEDED` block (question / options / recommendation / blocks).
+
+Stop and hand back when: the stuck queue is empty; a diagnosis needs a write you are not
+allowed to make; or two runs in a row produce the same finding, which means the finding
+is not being acted on and repeating it is noise.

skills/clean-code/SKILL.md

@@ -281,5 +281,14 @@ During refactoring:
 
 - `references/clean-code.md` — detailed naming rules, object calisthenics
 - `references/code-smells.md` — comprehensive smell catalog with examples
+- `references/python-adaptation.md` — Python conventions: error chaining, dataclasses, the truthiness trap
 - Load `solid` skill for SOLID principles with Go examples
 - Load `refactoring` skill for systematic refactoring techniques
+
+## Escalation
+
+Advisory during the REFACTOR phase. Suggests; does not restructure behaviour.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the cleanup you are proposing changes behaviour. That is not
+refactoring, it is a change, and it needs its own failing test first — hand back to
+`tdd`.

skills/clean-code/references/python-adaptation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# Clean Code: Python Adaptation
+
+The principles in `SKILL.md` are language-agnostic. This file covers the places where
+Python's idioms differ from the Go examples, and where following the Go shape produces
+bad Python.
+
+The canonical stack (ruff, mypy --strict, pytest, uv, pydantic-settings, src-layout)
+lives in `~/dev/.context/AGENT.md` and is not restated here — one source of truth, and
+it is not this file.
+
+## Reveal intent with types, not comments
+
+`mypy --strict` is the Python analogue of Go's compiler, and it is non-negotiable for
+the same reason: a type is a claim the machine checks, and a comment is a claim nobody
+checks. Two consequences for clean code specifically:
+
+- **`Any` is a hole in the argument.** Each one says "the reader is on their own here".
+  If a value is genuinely polymorphic, say so precisely — `Protocol`, a union, a
+  `TypeVar` — rather than surrendering.
+- **A `# type: ignore` needs the error code and a reason**: `# type: ignore[arg-type]  #
+  boto3 stubs lag the API`. A bare ignore is an unexplained exception to a rule the rest
+  of the file follows.
+
+## Errors: chain them, never swallow them
+
+Go's `fmt.Errorf("operation: %w", err)` is `raise` with `from`:
+
+```python
+# Bad — the original cause is gone, and so is the stack that produced it
+try:
+    row = fetch(invoice_id)
+except KeyError:
+    raise InvoiceNotFound(invoice_id)
+
+# Good — the chain survives; the traceback shows both
+try:
+    row = fetch(invoice_id)
+except KeyError as e:
+    raise InvoiceNotFound(invoice_id) from e
+```
+
+Two rules with no exceptions:
+
+- **Never bare `except:`.** It catches `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` too, so it
+  turns Ctrl-C into a swallowed error. `except Exception` if you truly mean everything.
+- **Never a silent `pass`.** An exception handler that does nothing is a decision to
+  ignore a failure; if that is genuinely right, the handler needs a comment saying why,
+  and usually a log line. Most of the time it is a bug being stored for later.
+
+## Data classes over dicts
+
+A `dict[str, Any]` passed between functions is Go's `map[string]interface{}` — every
+reader has to reconstruct the shape from the code that writes it.
+
+```python
+# Bad: shape known only by reading every producer
+def total(invoice: dict[str, Any]) -> int: ...
+
+# Good: shape declared once, checked everywhere
+@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
+class Invoice:
+    id: InvoiceId
+    lines: tuple[Line, ...]
+    currency: str  # ISO 4217
+
+def total(invoice: Invoice) -> Money: ...
+```
+
+`frozen=True` where the value is conceptually immutable — it makes accidental mutation
+an error rather than a surprise at a distance. Use `pydantic` models at the *boundary*
+(env config, HTTP payloads) where validation is the point, and dataclasses inside,
+where validation has already happened.
+
+## Two Python-specific traps that read as clean code
+
+**Mutable default arguments** are evaluated once, at definition:
+
+```python
+def add_line(line: Line, lines: list[Line] = []) -> list[Line]:  # shared across calls
+```
+
+Use `None` and build inside. Ruff catches this (`B006`); the point of naming it here is
+that the broken version looks tidier than the correct one.
+
+**Truthiness is not presence.** `if not amount:` is true for `0`, `0.0`, `""`, `[]` and
+`None` alike. For anything where zero is a legitimate value — money, counts, offsets —
+write `if amount is None:`. This is the single most common way a Python function
+silently mishandles a valid input.
+
+## Structure
+
+- `src/` layout, `pyproject.toml` only. A flat layout lets tests import the working
+  directory instead of the installed package, so the suite passes on a package that
+  cannot actually be installed.
+- Module names are the unit of cohesion, as Go packages are. `utils.py` is the Python
+  spelling of a god package: it has no reason to change because it has no subject.
+- Prefer functions to classes with one method. A class whose only job is to hold
+  constructor arguments and expose `run()` is a closure with ceremony.
+
+## See also
+
+- `references/clean-code.md` — the language-agnostic practices
+- `references/code-smells.md` — the smell catalogue, all of which apply here
+- `tdd/references/python.md` — the test-side conventions

skills/code-review/SKILL.md

@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of each phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "code-review", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "code-review", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Phases for this skill:** phase-0-iron-laws, phase-1-context, phase-2-architectural-analysis, phase-3-go-checklist, phase-4-code-smell-detection, phase-5-test-quality
 
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached.
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
 
 ## Common Go Anti-Patterns
 
@@ -279,11 +279,18 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 ## References
 
+- `references/python-adaptation.md` — the Python anti-pattern table, and what ruff/mypy
+  should have caught before review
 - `clean-code/references/code-smells.md` — comprehensive smell catalog
 - Load `refactoring` skill when recommending fixes
 - Load `test-design` skill for reviewing test quality
 - Load `solid` skill for SOLID principle violations
 
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
+## Escalation
 
-This skill is invoked identically in Mode 1 (cloud Claude) and Mode 2 (client-local with supervisor routing). The routing layer (Plan 6) does not exist yet; treat this skill as Mode 1 only for now. Findings format and severity classification are unchanged across modes.
+Read-only analysis. Findings are the output; nothing is handed back mid-review.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the diff is large enough that a review would be a skim — say so
+and ask for it in parts, rather than producing confident coverage of a fraction of it; or
+the problem is structural rather than pointwise, in which case name it and hand off to
+`solid` or `refactoring` instead of filing twenty line-level comments about one cause.

skills/code-review/references/python-adaptation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Code Review: Python Anti-Patterns
+
+`SKILL.md` carries the Go anti-pattern table. This is the Python one. The review
+process, severity classification and output format above it are language-neutral and
+apply unchanged.
+
+Canonical stack in `~/dev/.context/AGENT.md`. Two gates decide most of this file:
+`ruff` and `mypy --strict`. **If a finding is something ruff or mypy already catches,
+the review comment is not "fix this line" — it is "why is the gate not running?"**
+
+## The table
+
+| Anti-pattern | What to look for | Why it matters |
+|---|---|---|
+| Bare `except:` | `except:` with no exception class | Swallows `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`; Ctrl-C stops working |
+| Silent `pass` | `except X: pass` with no comment | A decision to ignore a failure, recorded nowhere |
+| Lost cause | `raise Y(...)` inside `except X as e` with no `from e` | Traceback loses the original failure — the Python analogue of a naked `fmt.Errorf` |
+| Mutable default | `def f(x, acc=[])` or `={}` | Evaluated once at definition; state leaks between calls |
+| Truthiness for presence | `if not amount:` where `0` is valid | Silently mishandles zero, empty string, empty list |
+| `Any` as an escape | `Any` in a signature that could be `Protocol`/union/`TypeVar` | Removes exactly the checking `--strict` was adopted for |
+| Unexplained ignore | bare `# type: ignore` | No error code, no reason; permanent by default |
+| `assert` in production code | `assert user.is_admin` outside tests | `python -O` strips asserts — the check vanishes in a tuned deployment |
+| Import-time side effects | connections, env reads, or I/O at module scope | Cannot be injected, cannot be tested, ordering-dependent |
+| Sync I/O in `async def` | `requests.get`, `time.sleep`, blocking file reads | Blocks the whole event loop; looks concurrent, is not |
+| Un-awaited coroutine | a call to an `async def` with no `await` | Silently does nothing; "coroutine was never awaited" is a warning, not an error |
+| `float` for money | `float` amounts, `round()` on currency | `0.1 + 0.2 != 0.3`; use `Decimal` or int minor units |
+| Broad `Exception` re-raise | `except Exception` around a whole function body | Turns a specific failure into an unclassifiable one |
+| Mutating a shared default/global | module-level `list`/`dict` mutated by functions | The Python spelling of shared mutable state |
+| `dict[str, Any]` as a domain type | dicts passed between layers | Shape known only by reading every producer; use a dataclass |
+| Star imports | `from x import *` | Breaks `--strict`, hides shadowing, defeats grep |
+| `os.path` string surgery | manual path joining, `+ "/"` | `pathlib` exists and is correct on every platform |
+| `subprocess(..., shell=True)` with interpolation | f-strings into a shell command | Injection; pass a list, no shell |
+
+## What to check that a linter cannot
+
+- **Does the test suite assert the failure mode, or only the happy path?** `pytest.raises`
+  with no `match=` accepts any message, including one from an unrelated bug.
+- **Are fixtures doing real work?** A `conftest.py` fixture with a `session` scope and
+  mutable state couples every test that touches it; failures then depend on ordering.
+- **Is the mock mocking a boundary or a collaborator you own?** The latter tests the mock.
+- **Does the type say what the code means?** `-> dict` and `-> tuple[int, int]` both pass
+  `--strict` and both tell the reader nothing. A named type is a review comment worth
+  making.
+- **Would `--strict` actually run on this file?** Check for a per-module override in
+  `pyproject.toml` silently exempting it. An exemption nobody revisits is a hole with a
+  changelog entry.
+
+## Severity in this context
+
+- **Blocking:** anything in the table above under security or correctness — `shell=True`
+  interpolation, `assert` as an authorization check, `float` money, sync I/O in async.
+- **Should fix:** typing escapes (`Any`, unexplained ignores), mutable defaults,
+  truthiness-for-presence.
+- **Consider:** structural comments — dataclass instead of dict, narrower Protocol.
+
+## See also
+
+- `clean-code/references/python-adaptation.md` — the style-level conventions
+- `solid/references/python-adaptation.md` — Protocol over ABC, DIP in Python
+- `tdd/references/python.md` — the test-side conventions this review checks against

skills/cognitive-load/SKILL.md

@@ -347,3 +347,12 @@ type UserWriter interface {
 - Load `refactoring` skill for systematic techniques to reduce identified hotspots
 - Load `solid` skill for structural fixes (coupling, cohesion)
 - Load `clean-code` skill for naming improvements
+
+## Escalation
+
+Read-only measurement. The score is the output.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the measurement disagrees with the reader's lived experience of
+the code. A metric that says "fine" about code everyone finds hard is evidence about the
+metric, not about the code, and continuing to defend the number is how a measure becomes
+a target.

skills/debug/SKILL.md

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 name: debug
 surfaces: [claude-code, library]
 summary: "Hypothesis-first debugging discipline"
-use_when: "Any test failure or bug whose cause is not immediately obvious"
+use_when: "Any test failure or bug whose cause is not immediately obvious — or a bug report with no failure text, which this skill refuses rather than guesses at"
-description: Systematic hypothesis-first debugging. Generate 3-5 ranked hypotheses with verification steps before suggesting any fix. Use when encountering a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior.
+description: Systematic hypothesis-first debugging. Requires the failure itself — error text, stack, run id or log — and names what it needs and stops if the report has none, rather than hypothesising into a vacuum. Given evidence, generates 3-5 ranked, falsifiable hypotheses with verification steps before suggesting any fix. Use when encountering a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior.
 ---
 
 # Debug
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ description: Systematic hypothesis-first debugging. Generate 3-5 ranked hypothes
 
 Debugging is hypothesis generation, not fix generation. The first instinct — "try this and see if it works" — wastes time and teaches nothing. A disciplined debug session produces a small set of ranked, falsifiable hypotheses, each with a concrete verification command. The fix comes after one hypothesis is confirmed, not before.
 
-**Core principle:** A hypothesis you cannot verify in one command is not a hypothesis — it is a guess.
+**Core principle:** A hypothesis you cannot verify with a single bounded, decisive observation is not a hypothesis — it is a guess. In a repo that observation is usually one command. Above one it may be an instrumented run, or partitioning the last twenty CI runs by trigger type; what makes it a hypothesis is that the observation *discriminates*, not that it fits on one line.
 
 ## When to Use
 
@@ -25,6 +25,27 @@ Debugging is hypothesis generation, not fix generation. The first instinct — "
 - Compile errors with clear messages (just fix the typo)
 - Already-diagnosed bugs where you know the cause (go straight to TDD with a regression test)
 
+### Is it actually diagnosed?
+
+That last exclusion is the one people get wrong, because a confident wrong diagnosis feels
+exactly like a right one. It is diagnosed if you can state the mechanism *and* name the
+observation that would have proved it wrong. If the evidence is "we changed X and it got
+better", that is correlation with a deployment, and this skill applies.
+
+The strongest tell is a run of failed fixes — see below. Three plausible fixes that did
+not eliminate the symptom is not bad luck, it is the diagnosis being wrong.
+
+### Intake: what you need before hypothesising
+
+Before generating anything, confirm you have the failure itself — the error text, the
+stack, the failing run's id, the log. If the report is "it's flaky again" with no
+artifact, **name the specific thing you need and stop**. Iron Law 1 forbids "try X and
+see"; hypothesising into a vacuum is the same failure with better grammar, and it is
+worse because the output looks like analysis.
+
+This is the rule `cad-babysit` already enforces from the other side: read the issue's own
+comments and the job log *first*.
+
 ## Iron Laws
 
 1. **Never suggest "try X and see what happens."** Every hypothesis must have a specific expected outcome if correct.
@@ -36,8 +57,9 @@ Debugging is hypothesis generation, not fix generation. The first instinct — "
 A system with boundaries (CI → build → signing, API → service → database) hides the
 question "which component is wrong?" behind the question "why is the output wrong?".
 Specify, as a pre-step, what to log entering and leaving **each** boundary, plus
-whether config and environment actually propagated. One run of that narrows the search
+whether config and environment actually propagated. One run *that reproduces the failure* narrows the search to a
-to a single component.
+single component. On an intermittent fault a passing run narrows nothing, so leave the
+instrumentation in across several runs rather than concluding from one.
 
 This does not suspend Iron Law 2. Still emit 3-5 hypotheses — the boundary spec comes
 first in the output, and each hypothesis says which boundary observation would kill it.
@@ -53,6 +75,10 @@ than fixes that partially worked.) Each one has been narrowing a window rather t
 closing it, and a fourth guess buys another tenth of the rate plus a layer of
 interacting guards nobody can reason about.
 
+Intake still gates this section. A report of three failed fixes with no artifacts fires
+both rules at once, and intake wins: you cannot aim hypotheses at a premise you have no
+evidence about either. Ask for the log, then aim.
+
 Say that explicitly — the refusal is the finding, not a preamble to it. Then aim the
 hypotheses one level up: the premise those fixes share is itself the thing to falsify.
 This is not an exemption from the output format. It is the format, pointed at the
@@ -76,18 +102,28 @@ For each hypothesis, capture three things:
 - **Verification:** the single command or file inspection that confirms or denies it
 - **Expected outcome if correct:** the specific output you would see
 
-Order by likelihood. The most likely cause is hypothesis 1.
+Order by likelihood, most likely first. **The ordering is the ranking — do not also
+attach `high`/`medium`/`low` labels.** With five slots and three labels the labels stop
+discriminating (two hypotheses are genuinely both "high" and the label cannot say which
+comes first), and a reader then has two orderings that can disagree. Position already
+carries it.
+
+Where you can say *why* one outranks another — a prior brain entry, a matching symptom,
+a recent change in that area — say that instead of a label. That is information; a label
+is a restatement of the order it sits next to.
 
 ### Step 3: Output
 
 Use this format:
 
 ```
-HYPOTHESIS 1 (likelihood: high): <mechanism in one sentence>
+HYPOTHESIS 1: <mechanism in one sentence>
-VERIFY: <exact command or file:line to inspect>
+WHY FIRST: <what makes it likeliest — a matching symptom, a recent change, a brain entry>
+VERIFY: <exact command, or the bounded observation that discriminates>
 EXPECTED IF CORRECT: <specific output, value, or condition>
 
-HYPOTHESIS 2 (likelihood: medium): <mechanism>
+HYPOTHESIS 2: <mechanism>
+WHY FIRST: <or why it ranks here rather than first>
 VERIFY: <exact command>
 EXPECTED IF CORRECT: <specific output>
 
@@ -109,15 +145,15 @@ End with the recommendation, not a fix.
 **Output:**
 
 ```
-HYPOTHESIS 1 (likelihood: high): parser indexes into pages[0] before checking len(pages) > 0; empty PDFs produce a zero-page document
+HYPOTHESIS 1: parser indexes into pages[0] before checking len(pages) > 0; empty PDFs produce a zero-page document
 VERIFY: rg -n 'pages\[0\]' internal/parser/
 EXPECTED IF CORRECT: at least one site reads pages[0] without a preceding length check
 
-HYPOTHESIS 2 (likelihood: medium): the test fixture is a zero-byte file rather than a valid empty PDF; pdf library returns nil pages slice instead of empty
+HYPOTHESIS 2: the test fixture is a zero-byte file rather than a valid empty PDF; pdf library returns nil pages slice instead of empty
 VERIFY: ls -la testdata/empty.pdf && file testdata/empty.pdf
 EXPECTED IF CORRECT: file size 0 bytes or "data" rather than "PDF document"
 
-HYPOTHESIS 3 (likelihood: low): a recently changed dependency reordered the page-extraction API; pages[0] now refers to metadata, not content
+HYPOTHESIS 3: a recently changed dependency reordered the page-extraction API; pages[0] now refers to metadata, not content
 VERIFY: git log --oneline -10 -- go.sum | grep -i pdf
 EXPECTED IF CORRECT: a pdf-library bump in the last few commits
 
@@ -131,6 +167,7 @@ RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP: Run VERIFY for hypothesis 1 first.
 | "Maybe try restarting the service" | Not a mechanism. Not falsifiable. Teaches nothing if it works. |
 | "Could be a race condition" | Mechanism without specifics. Which two operations race? On what state? |
 | "Let me add some print statements and see" | Skips hypothesis generation. Generates noise, not understanding. |
+| Answering "what's the fix?" from a report with no artifact | Hypothesising into a vacuum. The output looks like analysis, which is what makes it worse than saying "I need the log". |
 | Single hypothesis presented as fact | If you are sure, write the regression test, do not run a debug skill. |
 | Mixing hypotheses with fix suggestions | The skill is diagnose-only. The fix is a TDD task on its hypothesis. |
 
@@ -139,7 +176,8 @@ RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP: Run VERIFY for hypothesis 1 first.
 The brain holds prior debug sessions across the project. Use it to skip rediscovering known failure modes.
 
 **At debug start:**
-- Run `brain_query` with the error message snippet + the package name. Past sessions may have logged identical or similar failures with their resolved hypotheses.
+- Run `brain_query` with the error message snippet + the package name. On an intake stop you have neither — query the symptom and the component instead ("signed artifact missing CI"), which is worth doing precisely because it may name the artifact to ask for. Past sessions may have logged identical or similar failures with their resolved hypotheses.
+- **A hit is evidence, so cite it inline in the hypothesis it informs** — `(brain: <entry-name>)` — rather than mentioning it once at the top. If a prior entry is why a hypothesis ranks first, the reader needs that at the hypothesis, not in a preamble. If a prior entry contradicts your ranking, say so and rank it anyway if the evidence here is better; the brain records what was true then.
 
 **After a hypothesis is confirmed:**
 - Run `brain_write` with the failure signature → confirmed mechanism. Future debug sessions on the same area get the answer immediately.
@@ -154,20 +192,21 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of each phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "debug", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "debug", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
-**Phases for this skill:** read-failure, generate-hypotheses, output
+**Phases for this skill:** intake, read-failure, generate-hypotheses, output
+
+`intake` exists so that refusing correctly is recordable. A run that stops for want of a
+run id has done the right thing and logs `intake` / `pass`; without that phase the
+refusal logs as a failed `read-failure`, and a metric that penalises the skill's best
+behaviour teaches the next model to hypothesise into the vacuum instead.
 
 **Status semantics:**
 - `pass` — the phase's intended outcome was reached.
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached.
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
-
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
-
-This skill produces high-volume mechanical output (hypothesis enumeration) and is a candidate for Mode 2 routing to a local model in the future. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only. The hypothesis format and discipline are identical regardless of which model generates them.
 
 ## Cross-References
 
@@ -183,6 +222,18 @@ Techniques kept in `debug/references/`, inherited from the deleted
 - `defense-in-depth.md` — load after a root cause is confirmed, to decide which layers
   should have caught it.
 - `condition-based-waiting.md` — load whenever a timeout appears anywhere in the report,
-  including as one of the fixes already tried. A bumped timeout is a symptom.
+  including as one of the fixes already tried. A bumped timeout is a symptom. Not during an
+  intake stop: if you are not analysing yet, a symptom-analysis reference is on the wrong
+  side of the gate.
 - `find-polluter.sh` — run when a test passes alone and fails in the suite, or when
   something in the tree appears that no test admits to creating.
+
+## Escalation
+
+Diagnose only — Iron Law 3 is already an escalation rule: the fix is a separate TDD cycle,
+not this skill's output.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the report contains no failure text and no locator, in which case
+name the specific artifact you need (run id, job log, stack trace) and stop rather than
+hypothesising into a vacuum; or the evidence needed to discriminate between your top two
+hypotheses requires access you do not have.

skills/discovery-framing/SKILL.md

@@ -152,3 +152,12 @@ hand-wavy. Crisp solution + fuzzy problem = reverse-engineered justification. St
 
 > Named instances of both war stories are client-tagged and held out of this public skill
 > pending client-store decision. The transferable lesson lives here; the wrapper stays out.
+
+## Escalation
+
+Advisory. Produces a problem brief; commits to nothing.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the evidence needed to size a problem requires talking to
+customers you cannot reach. Sizing a problem from assumptions and presenting it as
+discovery is worse than saying the number is unknown — it launders a guess into a brief
+that later decisions will cite.

skills/experiment-spec/SKILL.md

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ If silhouette ≤ 0.20:
 
 **After experiment concludes:**
 - `brain_write` to `jepa-fx/failures/` with any new failure modes discovered
-- `session_log` with outcome
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "experiment-spec", phase: "conclude", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line outcome>"}`
 
 ## Cross-References
 

skills/feature-spec/SKILL.md

@@ -32,6 +32,90 @@ A feature spec is the implementation-level contract for one feature or component
 2. **An "Out of scope" section is mandatory.** If you do not draw the boundary, the implementer (you, future-you, or another agent) will guess wrong.
 3. **Every technical decision in "Technical approach" must have a rationale.** A decision is any choice where a reasonable alternative existed and was not taken. "Use Postgres" is not a decision; "use Postgres because the rest of the stack uses it and we need transactions across user + invoice" is.
 
+## EARS-lite acceptance criteria
+
+Measurable criteria answer "is it done?". They do not always answer "what should it do
+when X happens?" — and behavioural requirements written as prose are where ambiguity
+survives review. For any criterion that is conditional or event-driven, use EARS-lite
+instead of prose:
+
+```
+WHEN <trigger> THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+WHILE <state> THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+IF <unwanted condition> THEN THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+```
+
+There is a fourth, unconditional form. Use it for invariants — the properties that must
+hold with no trigger at all, which are usually the ones that matter most:
+
+```
+THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+```
+
+Worked, deliberately from a domain unlike whatever you are specifying:
+
+```
+THE SYSTEM SHALL reject a firmware image whose signature does not verify
+WHEN a sensor reports a temperature above the shutdown limit
+  THE SYSTEM SHALL open the contactor within 200ms
+WHILE the contactor is open
+  THE SYSTEM SHALL refuse every start command
+IF a sensor reading is missing or stale by more than one interval
+  THEN THE SYSTEM SHALL treat it as above the limit
+```
+
+The example is off-domain on purpose. An on-domain example gets copied: a spec written
+against an invoice-flavoured example inherited a requirement about extraction confidence
+that its feature request never mentioned, and the author only noticed on review. Read
+the shapes, not the content.
+
+Each conditional line names a trigger and one observable response, which usually maps
+onto a single test. The `WHILE` and unconditional forms are universally quantified —
+"every start command", "a firmware image" — so they map onto a property or a set of
+cases, not one assertion. That is still worth writing: it closes the requirements half
+of the audit trail, which is otherwise issue-body prose.
+
+**This is an option, not a replacement.** Threshold criteria ("p99 < 200ms under 100
+RPS") stay as they are — EARS phrasing adds nothing to a number. Use it for conditional
+behaviour, error handling, and state-dependent rules.
+
+## Context snapshot
+
+The executor of this spec will not see the conversation that produced it, and often
+cannot see the architecture document either — a different agent, a fresh session, a
+different machine. A spec that says "see the architecture doc" hands them a lookup they
+may not be able to perform.
+
+So inline the specific facts this spec depends on, not the whole document:
+
+```markdown
+## Context snapshot
+Taken from <source> @ <commit-or-date>. Re-check before implementing if stale.
+
+- The mailbox poller writes rows to `invoices` with `state = 'received'`.
+- The payment-file writer reads `invoices` and emits one file per batch.
+- Money is int64 minor units plus an ISO-4217 code; float is banned repo-wide.
+```
+
+Three rules keep this from becoming a second source of truth, which is the real
+objection to inlining and a good one:
+
+1. **Snapshot what the implementer cannot look up and cannot proceed without.** That is
+   wider than "facts this spec's decisions rest on" — a table name may underpin no
+   decision here and still be the thing that blocks writing the migration. It is still
+   narrower than the whole document: if a fact changes nothing and blocks nothing, leave
+   it out, and say what you left out so the omission reads as deliberate.
+2. **Always cite source and version.** A snapshot without provenance cannot be
+   revalidated, and an unrevalidatable copy is exactly the drift everyone fears.
+3. **If you could not read the source either, say so in those words.** Writing a spec
+   against a document you cannot open is common and is not a reason to skip the section
+   — it is a reason to mark the whole block `UNVERIFIED — reconstructed, not read`, and
+   to make confirming it the implementer's first task, before the first failing test.
+   An unmarked guess is the only genuinely dangerous version.
+4. **The snapshot is evidence, not authority.** Open the section with one line to that
+   effect — "where this disagrees with the source, the source wins and this spec is
+   stale" — rather than annotating each fact.
+
 ## Spec Template
 
 ```markdown
@@ -42,12 +126,21 @@ A feature spec is the implementation-level contract for one feature or component
 What problem does this feature solve? For whom? Why now?
 (2-4 sentences. If you cannot answer "why now," ask before writing the rest.)
 
+## Context snapshot
+[Facts the implementer cannot look up, with source and version. See "Context snapshot" above.]
+
 ## Success Criteria
 
 - [ ] Criterion 1 — measurable and verifiable
 - [ ] Criterion 2 — measurable and verifiable
 - [ ] Criterion 3 — measurable and verifiable
 
+### Behavioural criteria (EARS-lite)
+
+[Conditional and event-driven behaviour, one trigger and one observable response per
+line. Not checkboxes — these are properties, and several need more than one test each.
+Omit the subsection entirely if the feature has no conditional behaviour.]
+
 ## Constraints
 
 Non-negotiable requirements the solution must satisfy.
@@ -152,7 +245,7 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of each phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "feature-spec", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "feature-spec", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Phases for this skill:** draft
 
@@ -161,11 +254,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (spec rejected, blocked on unresolved questions).
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
-
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
-
-Spec writing requires interpretation of intent and tradeoff reasoning — work where Claude generally outperforms a 9-13B local model. This skill is intentionally **not** a Mode 2 routing candidate. In Mode 2, the routing layer should leave `feature-spec` calls on Claude.
 
 ## Cross-References
 

skills/grill-me/SKILL.md

@@ -148,3 +148,12 @@ This skill maps to the **convergence moments** in the Double Diamond workflow:
 - **Mid-Diamond 2 (Develop):** Use Quick Poke when an agent's experiment result is ambiguous and you're deciding whether to continue or pivot.
 
 The skill does NOT replace human judgment at convergence points — it sharpens the plan so that judgment is better informed.
+
+## Escalation
+
+Advisory. Produces sharper questions and a better plan; decides nothing.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the plan's weak point is a decision that is the operator's to
+make rather than a gap in reasoning — surface it as a question with options and a
+recommendation, and do not grill past it. Also stop when a round produces no new
+objection: interrogation past that point manufactures doubt rather than finding it.

skills/lineage/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+---
+name: lineage
+surfaces: [claude-code, library]
+summary: "Backward decision archaeology — was this tried before, and does the reason it failed still hold"
+use_when: "Before proposing something that feels new; when an idea keeps resurfacing; when you inherit code whose reason is gone"
+description: Backward decision archaeology. Find out whether an idea was already tried here, why it was dropped, and whether that reason still applies — using git history, decision records and the issue tracker rather than asking whoever is still around. Use before proposing a change that feels novel, when inheriting unexplained code, or when the same idea keeps being re-litigated.
+---
+
+# Lineage
+
+## Overview
+
+Most "new" ideas in an established codebase are revivals. The valuable question is never
+"is this a good idea" in the abstract — it is **"was this tried, what killed it, and is
+the killer still alive?"**
+
+A past failure is not evidence against trying again. It is context for trying again
+differently, and the difference between those two readings is usually one commit message.
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Before proposing something that feels new in a codebase older than you
+- When an idea keeps resurfacing and being re-argued from scratch
+- When you inherit code and cannot tell whether a constraint is load-bearing or vestigial
+- Before writing an ADR — the reason a thing was dropped belongs in your Context section
+
+**Do not use for:** code you wrote this week, or a question the current code answers.
+Archaeology on a live construction site is just reading.
+
+## The tool
+
+```sh
+skills/lineage/lineage.sh <term> [repo-path]
+```
+
+Runs the searches people skip because they are fiddly to type. In particular
+`git log -S<term>`, which finds commits where the term's **occurrence count changed** —
+so it surfaces the *removal* as well as the introduction. A plain `--grep` never finds a
+deletion, and the deletion is the whole point.
+
+It also lists files that once carried the term and no longer exist, and names the two
+sources it cannot search for you.
+
+**A no-match is not a finding.** The first version of this tool said a null meant "this is
+new here"; a pressure test caught it asserting exactly that about the most-discussed
+removed feature in this repo — the search term merely had a space in it. One string
+against one repo proves nothing. Try at least three variants (the identifier name, a
+one-word form, the name it would have had) and the brain and tracker searches before
+telling anyone an idea is novel. This is the same rule as the anti-patterns table below,
+and it is there because the tool broke it.
+
+Note also that `--grep` takes a regex and `-S` takes a literal string, so a term
+containing `.`, `[`, `*` or `+` matches differently in the two halves of the output.
+
+## The sequence
+
+**1. Search on the identifier, not the concept.** If the thing had a name in the code —
+a function, a flag, a config key — `git log --all -S<name>` typically returns exactly two
+commits, its birth and its death, on one screen. That is the fastest path to the answer in
+this whole sequence.
+
+Path-scoped log (`git log --all -- <file>`) is the weaker move and it is the one people
+reach for: a function deleted from a file that still exists is the *dominant* removal
+shape, and the path search buries it under every other commit that touched the file.
+
+Concept words are the fallback, and they are lossy — a term with a space in it will miss
+the record entirely. Try several spellings before you conclude anything.
+
+**2. Read the removal commit's full body, not its subject.**
+
+```sh
+git log -1 --format=%B <sha>
+git show --stat <sha>
+```
+
+This is where the answer almost always is. A subject line says *what*; the body says
+*why*, and the why is what you came for. Read the diff too — what was removed alongside
+it tells you how load-bearing it was.
+
+**3. Search outside git — that is where this estate keeps its reasoning.** Two sources,
+both routinely decisive, neither reachable from a commit log:
+
+- **The brain** (`brain_query`). Postmortems and generalized rules live there. In the run
+  that shaped this skill, the single best artifact — the rule abstracted from the incident,
+  with detection one-liners — came from the brain and from nowhere else.
+- **The issue tracker, including comments.** The commit records *that* something was
+  removed; the argument for it is usually in a comment. Search closed issues especially —
+  a closed issue is where a decision usually is.
+
+A git-only search finds the what and misses the why.
+
+**4. Test whether the failure conditions still hold — empirically, not from the record.**
+This is the step that makes the whole exercise worth doing, and it is the one that gets
+hand-waved. Write the conditions down as separate claims, then **run a command per claim**:
+
+| Claim from the record | How you check it today |
+|---|---|
+| "absolute links break across two path roots" | `readlink` one, `test -e` it on this host |
+| "it is gitignored, so nobody sees the rot" | `grep` the ignore file |
+| "the detector does not cover it" | `grep` the detector for the path it scans |
+
+Twenty seconds each, and it converts *"the record claims X"* into *"X is true right now"* —
+which is the only form of the answer worth giving. A constraint that has since been
+removed turns a dead idea live; one that is still true kills a revival on the spot.
+
+**5. Separate the mechanism from the goal.** A revival proposal usually bundles both, and
+they can have opposite verdicts: the goal is still worth wanting, the mechanism is the one
+that failed. Splitting them is often the whole finding — you end up agreeing with the
+proposer and rejecting their implementation, which is a far more useful answer than yes
+or no.
+
+## What "it was tried and failed" can mean
+
+| Reading | Tell | What to do |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Structurally impossible** | The removal commit says *why* it cannot work, not that it broke | Believe it. Look for a different mechanism for the same goal |
+| **Failed under conditions that changed** | The blocker names a version, a host, a tool that has since moved | Re-open it, citing what changed |
+| **Failed on execution** | It broke, was reverted, nobody diagnosed it | Genuinely undecided. The revival is legitimate; budget for the diagnosis |
+| **Never actually tried** | Discussed, an issue exists, no commit | There is no evidence either way. Say so rather than inheriting someone's pessimism |
+| **Still there, in a different shape** | The idea returned under another name | The most missable one — check before you build it twice |
+
+## Output
+
+Answer the question that was asked, then show your work:
+
+- **Verdict** — tried / not tried / tried and later restored differently
+- **The decisive artifact** — commit sha, issue number, or ADR, so the reader can check
+- **What killed it**, quoted from the source rather than paraphrased
+- **Whether that still applies**, per condition, not as a single yes or no
+
+If the decisive evidence is one commit message, quote it. A conclusion that makes the
+reader re-run your search has not saved them anything.
+
+## Anti-patterns
+
+| Anti-pattern | Why it fails |
+|---|---|
+| `--grep` only | Finds discussion, misses deletions. The deletion is the evidence |
+| Reading the commit subject and stopping | Subjects say what; you need why |
+| Treating a past failure as a verdict | Conditions change. That is the entire question |
+| Git-only search | The argument is usually in the issue tracker |
+| "It was tried and it failed" with no sha | Unverifiable, and it will be re-litigated next quarter |
+| Assuming absence means it was never considered | It may have been rejected in a conversation. Say what you searched |
+
+## Escalation
+
+Read-only. Reports what the record says; changes nothing and revives nothing.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the record is genuinely silent — no commit, no issue, no ADR.
+State what you searched and that nothing exists, rather than inferring intent from
+absence. Someone deciding not to build a thing and nobody ever considering it look
+identical in git, and only one of them is an argument.
+
+Also stop when the answer turns on why a *person* did something and the record does not
+say. Ask them. Reconstructing a colleague's reasoning from a diff is how a guess acquires
+a citation.
+
+## Cross-References
+
+- `adr` — what you find here belongs in the Context section of the ADR you are about to
+  write. If the thing was decided before, your ADR supersedes that one; say so.
+- `debug` — the same discipline aimed at a failure rather than a decision: evidence
+  before hypothesis, and the removal commit is evidence.

skills/lineage/lineage.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# lineage.sh — decision archaeology for one term.
+#
+# Answers "why does X exist, was it tried before, and is this 'new' idea a
+# revival?"
+#
+# Its real value is that it makes you run `git log -S` at all — that is a nudge,
+# not a capability. -S finds commits where the term's occurrence COUNT changed,
+# so it surfaces a removal; --grep only finds people talking about one. On an
+# identifier name (`wire_claude_repo`) -S typically returns exactly two commits,
+# birth and death, which is the fastest path to the answer in this whole file.
+#
+# Note the two searches do not match the same way: --grep takes a regex, -S takes
+# a literal string. A term containing . [ * + behaves differently in each.
+#
+# Usage: lineage.sh <term> [repo-path]
+#
+# Read-only: nothing here writes, and it never touches the index or worktree.
+
+set -u
+
+[ $# -ge 1 ] || { echo "usage: lineage.sh <term> [repo-path]" >&2; exit 2; }
+TERM_=$1
+REPO=${2:-.}
+
+git -C "$REPO" rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 || {
+  echo "lineage: $REPO is not a git repository" >&2; exit 2; }
+
+# Say which repo, always. The default is the cwd, and in a worktree-heavy setup
+# that is routinely not the repo the caller means — a confident null against the
+# wrong tree is the worst thing this tool can produce.
+TOPLEVEL=$(git -C "$REPO" rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || printf '%s' "$REPO")
+printf 'searching: %s   term: "%s"\n' "$TOPLEVEL" "$TERM_"
+
+FMT='%h  %ad  %an  %s'
+DATE='--date=short'
+found=0
+
+section() { printf '\n== %s ==\n' "$1"; }
+
+# 1. Commits whose MESSAGE mentions it — the stated reasoning.
+msgs=$(git -C "$REPO" log --all -i --grep="$TERM_" --format="$FMT" $DATE 2>/dev/null || true)
+if [ -n "$msgs" ]; then
+  found=1
+  section "Commits that talk about it (message)"
+  printf '%s\n' "$msgs"
+fi
+
+# 2. Commits where the term was ADDED or REMOVED — the actual history.
+#    -S counts occurrences, so a deletion shows up here and nowhere else.
+picks=$(git -C "$REPO" log --all -S"$TERM_" --format="$FMT" $DATE 2>/dev/null || true)
+if [ -n "$picks" ]; then
+  found=1
+  section "Commits where it appeared or disappeared (-S)"
+  printf '%s\n' "$picks"
+  printf '\n   Oldest is the introduction. Anything after it that removed the term is\n'
+  printf '   the interesting one: read that commit before proposing this again.\n'
+fi
+
+# 3. Files that once contained it and no longer exist.
+deleted=$(git -C "$REPO" log --all --diff-filter=D --name-only --format='%h' -S"$TERM_" 2>/dev/null \
+  | grep -v '^[0-9a-f]\{7,\}$' | grep -v '^$' | sort -u || true)
+if [ -n "$deleted" ]; then
+  found=1
+  section "Files deleted that carried it"
+  printf '%s\n' "$deleted"
+  printf '\n   Recover one with: git -C %s show <sha>^:<path>\n' "$REPO"
+fi
+
+# 4. Decision records naming it.
+docs=$(git -C "$REPO" grep -l -i "$TERM_" -- 'docs/adr/*' 'docs/decisions/*' 'docs/*.md' 'ADR*' 2>/dev/null || true)
+if [ -n "$docs" ]; then
+  found=1
+  section "Decision records naming it"
+  printf '%s\n' "$docs"
+fi
+
+# This estate keeps most of its reasoning OUTSIDE the repo, so the two searches
+# this tool cannot run are usually the decisive ones. Say so every time rather
+# than letting their absence read as a null result.
+section "Not searched here — do these by hand"
+printf 'brain:  brain_query "%s" — decisions and postmortems live there, not in docs/\n' "$TERM_"
+printf 'gitea:  closed issues and their COMMENTS. The argument for a removal is\n'
+printf '        usually in a comment; the commit only records that it happened.\n'
+
+if [ "$found" -eq 0 ]; then
+  printf '\nno match for the exact string "%s" in %s.\n' "$TERM_" "$TOPLEVEL"
+  printf 'This is NOT evidence the idea is new. It is one string against one repo.\n'
+  printf 'Before concluding anything, try: the identifier or function name; a\n'
+  printf 'one-word variant (spaces and punctuation break the match); the name it\n'
+  printf 'would have had; and the brain and issue searches above.\n'
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+printf '\n-- what this cannot tell you --------------------------------------------\n'
+printf 'Why it was removed, if it was. The commit subject is a summary; read the\n'
+printf 'body, the PR, and the issue it closed. A past failure under conditions that\n'
+printf 'no longer hold is not evidence against trying again — it is context for\n'
+printf 'trying again differently.\n'

skills/session-retrospective/SKILL.md

@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of each phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "session-retrospective", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "session-retrospective", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Phases for this skill:** surfaced
 
@@ -125,11 +125,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (retrospective could not produce coherent candidates).
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (no novel learnings worth surfacing).
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
-
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
-
-Reading long session logs and pulling themes is high-volume, mechanical pattern-recognition work — a strong Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only.
 
 ## Cross-References
 

skills/solid/SKILL.md

@@ -258,5 +258,15 @@ Domain types know nothing about HTTP, SQL, or external APIs.
 
 - `references/solid-principles.md` — canonical SOLID reference with TypeScript examples
 - `references/go-adaptation.md` — this workspace's Go-specific rewrite of each principle
+- `references/python-adaptation.md` — the Python rewrite: Protocol over ABC, and what does not carry over from Go
 - Load `clean-code` skill for naming and structure
 - Load `code-review` skill for detecting violations during review
+
+## Escalation
+
+Advisory. Names principle violations and suggests structure; writes no code.
+
+Stop and hand back when: applying a principle would require a change larger than the one
+under discussion. "This wants dependency inversion" on a two-line fix is a design
+conversation, not a review comment, and forcing it through as one is how a small change
+acquires an architecture.

skills/solid/references/python-adaptation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# SOLID Principles: Python Adaptation
+
+`references/go-adaptation.md` rewrites each principle for Go. This file does the same
+for Python, and marks the places where the Go rewrite's advice does *not* carry over.
+
+The canonical Python stack lives in `~/dev/.context/AGENT.md`; it is not restated here.
+
+## The one idea that changes everything: `Protocol`
+
+Go's interfaces are structural — a type satisfies one by having the methods, with no
+declaration. Python has the same thing since 3.8, and it is the right default:
+
+```python
+from typing import Protocol
+
+class InvoiceStore(Protocol):
+    def get(self, invoice_id: InvoiceId) -> Invoice: ...
+    def save(self, invoice: Invoice) -> None: ...
+```
+
+- **Define the Protocol where it is *consumed*, not where it is implemented.** This is
+  Go's "accept interfaces, return structs" and it is what makes DIP real: the high-level
+  module owns the abstraction, and the adapter depends on it rather than the reverse.
+- **Prefer `Protocol` to `ABC`.** An ABC forces implementers to inherit, which couples
+  them to your package and makes a third-party class impossible to adapt without a
+  wrapper. Use an ABC only when you genuinely need shared implementation, not just a
+  contract.
+- Add `@runtime_checkable` only if you actually call `isinstance` — and if you are
+  calling `isinstance` against a Protocol, check whether the real problem is a missing
+  polymorphic method (an LSP smell).
+
+## S — Single Responsibility
+
+Same as Go: the unit is the module, not just the class. `utils.py` is the Python god
+package — it cannot have one reason to change because it has no subject.
+
+Python-specific tell: a class whose `__init__` stores arguments and whose only other
+method is `run()` or `execute()`. That is a function with ceremony. Write the function.
+
+## O — Open/Closed
+
+Extension in Python usually means **passing behaviour in**, not subclassing:
+
+```python
+# Closed for modification: adding a rule does not touch this function
+def apply_rules(invoice: Invoice, rules: Sequence[Rule]) -> Invoice: ...
+```
+
+`functools.singledispatch` is the idiomatic open extension point when dispatch is on
+type and the set of types grows outside your module. Beware the alternative that looks
+Pythonic and is not: monkey-patching is modification pretending to be extension, and it
+is invisible at the call site.
+
+## L — Liskov
+
+The Python-specific violation is **signature widening/narrowing that the type checker
+would catch if you let it**. Under `mypy --strict`, an override that narrows a parameter
+type or widens a return type is an error — which means most LSP violations in Python are
+type errors you chose not to see. This is the strongest argument for `--strict` in a
+design document rather than a style one.
+
+Raising a *new* exception type in an override is the violation `mypy` will not catch:
+callers wrote `except StoreError`, and your subclass raises `TimeoutError`. Exceptions
+are part of the contract; Python just will not check them for you.
+
+## I — Interface Segregation
+
+Protocols make this cheap: define the narrow one you need at the call site.
+
+```python
+class InvoiceReader(Protocol):
+    def get(self, invoice_id: InvoiceId) -> Invoice: ...
+```
+
+A function that only reads should accept `InvoiceReader`, not the full `InvoiceStore`.
+The test double then implements one method instead of eight, which is the practical
+payoff and the reason this principle survives contact with real code.
+
+## D — Dependency Inversion
+
+Constructor injection, exactly as in Go. Two Python-specific hazards:
+
+- **Import-time side effects are hidden dependencies.** A module that opens a database
+  connection or reads an env var at import has a dependency nothing can inject and no
+  test can replace. Configuration belongs in `pydantic-settings` objects passed in.
+- **Default arguments are compile-time bindings.** `def send(client: Client = Client())`
+  constructs the default once, at definition, and welds it to every caller. Default to
+  `None` and construct inside, or require it.
+
+## What does not carry over from the Go rewrite
+
+- **"Return structs, accept interfaces"** — the returning half is about Go's zero values
+  and nil interfaces. In Python, returning a Protocol type is fine and often better.
+- **Small interfaces because of embedding** — Python has no embedding; composition is
+  explicit delegation, which is more verbose but reads honestly.
+- **Package-level responsibility as the unit of deployment** — Python packaging is much
+  looser. The module boundary is still the right unit for *reasoning*, but do not expect
+  it to be enforced.
+
+## See also
+
+- `references/solid-principles.md` — the canonical, language-neutral reference
+- `references/go-adaptation.md` — the Go rewrite; contrast is instructive
+- `clean-code/references/python-adaptation.md` — style-level Python conventions

skills/spec-driven-dev/SKILL.md

@@ -200,6 +200,56 @@ Dev:     [full command]
 [Anything unresolved that needs input before implementation begins]
 ```
 
+## EARS-lite acceptance criteria
+
+Measurable criteria answer "is it done?". They do not always answer "what should it do
+when X happens?" — and behavioural requirements written as prose are where ambiguity
+survives review. For any criterion that is conditional or event-driven, use EARS-lite
+instead of prose:
+
+```
+WHEN <trigger> THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+WHILE <state> THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+IF <unwanted condition> THEN THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+```
+
+There is a fourth, unconditional form. Use it for invariants — the properties that must
+hold with no trigger at all, which are usually the ones that matter most:
+
+```
+THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
+```
+
+Worked, deliberately from a domain unlike whatever you are specifying:
+
+```
+THE SYSTEM SHALL reject a firmware image whose signature does not verify
+WHEN a sensor reports a temperature above the shutdown limit
+  THE SYSTEM SHALL open the contactor within 200ms
+WHILE the contactor is open
+  THE SYSTEM SHALL refuse every start command
+IF a sensor reading is missing or stale by more than one interval
+  THEN THE SYSTEM SHALL treat it as above the limit
+```
+
+The example is off-domain on purpose. An on-domain example gets copied: a spec written
+against an invoice-flavoured example inherited a requirement about extraction confidence
+that its feature request never mentioned, and the author only noticed on review. Read
+the shapes, not the content.
+
+Each conditional line names a trigger and one observable response, which usually maps
+onto a single test. The `WHILE` and unconditional forms are universally quantified —
+"every start command", "a firmware image" — so they map onto a property or a set of
+cases, not one assertion. That is still worth writing: it closes the requirements half
+of the audit trail, which is otherwise issue-body prose.
+
+**This is an option, not a replacement.** Threshold criteria ("p99 < 200ms under 100
+RPS") stay as they are — EARS phrasing adds nothing to a number. Use it for conditional
+behaviour, error handling, and state-dependent rules.
+
+For the executor-facing handoff, `feature-spec` also carries a **Context snapshot**
+section — inline the architecture facts the implementer cannot look up.
+
 ## Reframing Vague Requirements
 
 When you receive a vague requirement, translate it into specific success criteria before writing any spec content:
@@ -282,7 +332,7 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of each phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "spec-driven-dev", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "spec-driven-dev", phase: "<phase-name>", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Phases for this skill:** specify, plan, tasks, implement
 
@@ -291,7 +341,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (gate blocked, rework required).
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
 
 ## Cross-References
 

skills/stage-gate-review/SKILL.md

@@ -151,3 +151,12 @@ stays in the client boundary**:
 - Council/forum names, internal stage labels, internal tooling, named contacts, strategy
   specifics, deal terms → client dir/org only, local models only, never the public brain.
 - This skill carries the **pattern**; the client carries the **wrapper**. Never merge them.
+
+## Escalation
+
+Advisory. Prepares or chairs a gate; the council decides, not this skill.
+
+Stop and hand back when: a discipline's evidence is missing rather than weak. A gap on a
+gating discipline means do not bring the ask — bring a feedback-only ask instead. Marking
+it "cleared with a note" is precisely the gate theatre the anti-patterns section is
+about.

skills/superpowers-brainstorming/spec-document-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a spec document reviewer subagent.
 **Dispatch after:** Spec document is written to docs/superpowers/specs/
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Agent tool (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`):
   description: "Review spec document"
   prompt: |
     You are a spec document reviewer. Verify this spec is complete and ready for planning.

skills/superpowers-dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md

@@ -68,13 +68,30 @@ Each agent gets:
 
 ### 3. Dispatch in Parallel
 
-```typescript
+Issue every dispatch in **one** message — several `Agent` tool uses in a single
-// In Claude Code / AI environment
+assistant turn run concurrently; one per turn runs them in series.
-Task("Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures")
+
-Task("Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures")
-Task("Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures")
-// All three run concurrently
 ```
+Agent(description: "fix abort tests",   subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: ...)
+Agent(description: "fix batch tests",   subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: ...)
+Agent(description: "fix approval tests", subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: ...)
+```
+
+Options that matter for this pattern:
+
+- `run_in_background: true` (the default) returns immediately and notifies on
+  completion. Set it to `false` only when your very next action depends on the result.
+- `isolation: "worktree"` gives an agent its own git worktree. Use it whenever two
+  agents might touch the same files — parallel writers to one tree is the failure this
+  skill's independence rule exists to avoid, and a worktree makes it structural rather
+  than a matter of discipline.
+- `model` overrides the model per agent; cheap mechanical fan-out does not need the
+  same model as the reasoning that planned it.
+
+For a fan-out with real structure — phases, a verify pass per finding, fan-in — the
+`Workflow` tool expresses it directly with `agent()`, `parallel()` and `pipeline()`.
+It spawns many agents and costs accordingly, so it runs **only on explicit opt-in from
+the operator**; do not reach for it just because a task looks parallel.
 
 ### 4. Review and Integrate
 

skills/superpowers-executing-plans/SKILL.md

@@ -14,14 +14,16 @@ Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
 
 **Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
 
-**Note:** Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
+**Note:** This skill is the fallback for harnesses with no subagents. Claude Code has
+them — the `Agent` tool — so on this fleet prefer `superpowers-subagent-driven-development`
+and use this skill only where `Agent` is genuinely unavailable (Crush, Pi, OpenCode).
 
 ## The Process
 
 ### Step 1: Load and Review Plan
 1. Read plan file
 2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
-3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
+3. If concerns: Raise them with the operator before starting
 4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
 
 ### Step 2: Execute Tasks

skills/superpowers-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ WHY: Items may be related. Partial understanding = wrong implementation.
 
 **Example:**
 ```
-your human partner: "Fix 1-6"
+the operator: "Fix 1-6"
 You understand 1,2,3,6. Unclear on 4,5.
 
 ❌ WRONG: Implement 1,2,3,6 now, ask about 4,5 later
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ You understand 1,2,3,6. Unclear on 4,5.
 
 ## Source-Specific Handling
 
-### From your human partner
+### From the operator
 - **Trusted** - implement after understanding
 - **Still ask** if scope unclear
 - **No performative agreement**
@@ -84,11 +84,11 @@ IF suggestion seems wrong:
 IF can't easily verify:
   Say so: "I can't verify this without [X]. Should I [investigate/ask/proceed]?"
 
-IF conflicts with your human partner's prior decisions:
+IF conflicts with the operator's prior decisions:
-  Stop and discuss with your human partner first
+  Stop and discuss with the operator first
 ```
 
-**your human partner's rule:** "External feedback - be skeptical, but check carefully"
+**the operator's rule:** "External feedback - be skeptical, but check carefully"
 
 ## YAGNI Check for "Professional" Features
 
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ IF reviewer suggests "implementing properly":
   IF used: Then implement properly
 ```
 
-**your human partner's rule:** "You and reviewer both report to me. If we don't need this feature, don't add it."
+**the operator's rule:** "You and reviewer both report to me. If we don't need this feature, don't add it."
 
 ## Implementation Order
 
@@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ Push back when:
 - Violates YAGNI (unused feature)
 - Technically incorrect for this stack
 - Legacy/compatibility reasons exist
-- Conflicts with your human partner's architectural decisions
+- Conflicts with the operator's architectural decisions
 
 **How to push back:**
 - Use technical reasoning, not defensiveness
 - Ask specific questions
 - Reference working tests/code
-- Involve your human partner if architectural
+- Involve the operator if architectural
 
 **Signal if uncomfortable pushing back out loud:** "Strange things are afoot at the Circle K"
 
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Reviewer: "Implement proper metrics tracking with database, date filters, CSV ex
 
 **Unclear Item (Good):**
 ```
-your human partner: "Fix items 1-6"
+the operator: "Fix items 1-6"
 You understand 1,2,3,6. Unclear on 4,5.
 ✅ "Understand 1,2,3,6. Need clarification on 4 and 5 before implementing."
 ```

skills/superpowers-requesting-code-review/SKILL.md

@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
 
 **2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:**
 
-Use Task tool with `general-purpose` type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`
+Use the `Agent` tool with `subagent_type: "general-purpose"`, filling the template at
+`code-reviewer.md`. A reviewer needs no write access and benefits from none — if the
+harness offers a read-only agent type, prefer it.
 
 **Placeholders:**
 - `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary of what you built

skills/superpowers-requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a code reviewer subagent.
 **Purpose:** Review completed work against requirements and code quality standards before it cascades into more work.
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Agent tool (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`):
   description: "Review code changes"
   prompt: |
     You are a Senior Code Reviewer with expertise in software architecture,

skills/superpowers-subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after
 
 **Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration
 
-**Continuous execution:** Do not pause to check in with your human partner between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are: BLOCKED status you cannot resolve, ambiguity that genuinely prevents progress, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.
+**Continuous execution:** Do not pause to check in with the operator between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are: BLOCKED status you cannot resolve, ambiguity that genuinely prevents progress, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.
 
 ## When to Use
 

skills/superpowers-subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a code quality reviewer subagent.
 **Only dispatch after spec compliance review passes.**
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Agent tool (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`):
   Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
 
   DESCRIPTION: [task summary, from implementer's report]

skills/superpowers-subagent-driven-development/implementer-prompt.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Use this template when dispatching an implementer subagent.
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Agent tool (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`):
   description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"
   prompt: |
     You are implementing Task N: [task name]

skills/superpowers-subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.
 **Purpose:** Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Agent tool (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`):
   description: "Review spec compliance for Task N"
   prompt: |
     You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.

skills/superpowers-using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md

@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ When a skill says to dispatch a named agent type, use `@generalist` with the ful
 
 | Skill instruction | Gemini CLI equivalent |
 |-------------------|----------------------|
-| `Task tool (superpowers:implementer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `implementer-prompt.md` template |
+| `Agent tool (superpowers:implementer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `implementer-prompt.md` template |
-| `Task tool (superpowers:spec-reviewer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `spec-reviewer-prompt.md` template |
+| `Agent tool (superpowers:spec-reviewer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `spec-reviewer-prompt.md` template |
-| `Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer)` | `@code-reviewer` (bundled agent) or `@generalist` with the filled review prompt |
+| `Agent tool (superpowers:code-reviewer)` | `@code-reviewer` (bundled agent) or `@generalist` with the filled review prompt |
-| `Task tool (superpowers:code-quality-reviewer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` template |
+| `Agent tool (superpowers:code-quality-reviewer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` template |
-| `Task tool (general-purpose)` with inline prompt | `@generalist` with your inline prompt |
+| `Agent tool (general-purpose)` with inline prompt | `@generalist` with your inline prompt |
 
 ### Prompt filling
 

skills/superpowers-verification-before-completion/SKILL.md

@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Skip any step = lying, not verifying
 ## Why This Matters
 
 From 24 failure memories:
-- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
+- the operator said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
 - Undefined functions shipped - would crash
 - Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
 - Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework

skills/superpowers-writing-plans/plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a plan document reviewer subagent.
 **Dispatch after:** The complete plan is written.
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Agent tool (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`):
   description: "Review plan document"
   prompt: |
     You are a plan document reviewer. Verify this plan is complete and ready for implementation.

skills/superpowers-writing-skills/SKILL.md

@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Always use subagents (50-100x context savings). REQUIRED: Use [other-skill-name]
 **Compress examples:**
 ```markdown
 # ❌ BAD: Verbose example (42 words)
-your human partner: "How did we handle authentication errors in React Router before?"
+the operator: "How did we handle authentication errors in React Router before?"
 You: I'll search past conversations for React Router authentication patterns.
 [Dispatch subagent with search query: "React Router authentication error handling 401"]
 
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ digraph when_flowchart {
 
 See @graphviz-conventions.dot for graphviz style rules.
 
-**Visualizing for your human partner:** Use `render-graphs.js` in this directory to render a skill's flowcharts to SVG:
+**Visualizing for the operator:** Use `render-graphs.js` in this directory to render a skill's flowcharts to SVG:
 ```bash
 ./render-graphs.js ../some-skill           # Each diagram separately
 ./render-graphs.js ../some-skill --combine # All diagrams in one SVG

skills/tdd/SKILL.md

@@ -100,13 +100,21 @@ go test -run TestRetryOperation_RetriesThreeTimes ./...
 ```
 
 Confirm:
-- Test fails (not compilation errors)
+- Test fails, and fails because the feature is missing
-- Failure message is expected
+- The failure message is the one you expected
-- Fails because feature is missing (not typos)
+- It is not failing on a typo in the test itself
 
 **Test passes?** You're testing existing behavior. Fix test.
 
-**Compilation errors?** Fix errors, re-run until it fails correctly.
+**Failing because the thing does not exist yet?** That is a legitimate red — a Go
+compile error for an undefined function, a Python `ImportError` for a module you have
+not written, a TypeScript "cannot find module". Read the message, confirm it names the
+unit you are about to build, and proceed to GREEN. **Do not write a stub to make the
+runner happier.** A stub is production code written before a failing test, which is the
+Iron Law with extra steps.
+
+**Failing on a typo or a broken import elsewhere?** Different thing. Fix it and re-run
+until the failure is the one above.
 
 ### GREEN - Minimal Code
 
@@ -166,6 +174,23 @@ Keep tests green. Don't add behavior.
 
 Next failing test for next behavior.
 
+## Other languages
+
+The discipline above is language-neutral; the examples below it are Go, because Go is
+this fleet's default stack and one good example beats five mediocre ones.
+
+For anything else, the per-language conventions live in reference files — load the one
+you need rather than translating Go idioms by eye. Translation is where the mistakes
+happen: the Go table-driven exemplar below branches on a `wantErr` column inside the
+loop, which is idiomatic Go and an anti-pattern in pytest, where it produces a
+conditional assertion and folds two behaviours into one test.
+
+- `references/python.md` — pytest, `@pytest.mark.parametrize`, `mypy --strict` in the
+  RED gate, `pytest.raises(..., match=)`, fixtures vs helpers
+- `references/typescript.md` — vitest/jest, `it.each`, `expect(...).rejects`
+- `references/rust.md` — `#[cfg(test)]` modules, table-driven via arrays, `#[should_panic]`
+- `references/java.md` — JUnit 5, `@ParameterizedTest`, `assertThrows`
+
 ## Go-Specific TDD Notes
 
 ### Table-Driven Tests (Preferred Pattern)
@@ -329,12 +354,18 @@ Before marking work complete:
 - [ ] Watched each test fail before implementing
 - [ ] Each test failed for expected reason (feature missing, not typo)
 - [ ] Wrote minimal code to pass each test
-- [ ] All tests pass: `go test ./...`
+- [ ] All tests pass
-- [ ] Race detector clean: `go test -race ./...`
+- [ ] The language's static gate is clean — `go vet`, `mypy --strict`, `tsc --noEmit`,
+      `cargo clippy`. A red type-check is a red build; it does not wait for GREEN.
+- [ ] The language's concurrency gate is clean **where one exists and applies** —
+      `go test -race`, `cargo test` under Miri for unsafe code. There is no equivalent
+      for a pure Python function, and a checklist box that can never be ticked teaches
+      people to skip checklists. Tick it or strike it deliberately; do not leave it
+      hanging.
 - [ ] Tests use real code (mocks only if crossing a system boundary)
 - [ ] Edge cases and errors covered
 
-Can't check all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over.
+Can't check **or deliberately strike** all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over. A box struck with a stated reason is answered; a box left hanging is not.
 
 ## When Stuck
 
@@ -343,7 +374,7 @@ Can't check all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over.
 | Don't know how to test | Write wished-for API. Write assertion first. Ask Mathias. |
 | Test too complicated | Design too complicated. Simplify interface. |
 | Must mock everything | Code too coupled. Use dependency injection. |
-| Test setup huge | Extract helpers with `t.Helper()`. Still complex? Simplify design. |
+| Test setup huge | Extract helpers (`t.Helper()` in Go, a local `__tracebackhide__ = True` in Python). Still complex? Simplify design. |
 
 ## Debugging Integration
 
@@ -375,20 +406,20 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of `red` phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "tdd", phase: "red", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "tdd", phase: "red", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **At end of `green` phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "tdd", phase: "green", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "tdd", phase: "green", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **At end of `refactor` phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "tdd", phase: "refactor", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "tdd", phase: "refactor", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Status semantics:**
 - `pass` — the phase's intended outcome was reached (red: test fails as expected; green: test passes; refactor: tests still pass after refactor).
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (test compiled when it shouldn't, test still fails after green attempt, refactor broke tests).
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (e.g. refactor not warranted).
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future `tdd` call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data and may default-route or default-not-route in a way that doesn't reflect real performance.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a `tdd` call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way, and a decision made on no evidence is a coin flip wearing a metric.
 
 ## Final Rule
 
@@ -398,7 +429,3 @@ Otherwise → not TDD
 ```
 
 No exceptions without Mathias's permission.
-
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
-
-This skill is invoked identically whether the agent is running in Mode 1 (cloud Claude, no routing) or Mode 2 (client-local, supervisor routing layer). The routing pod (Plan 6) does not exist yet; until it does, treat this skill as Mode 1 only. The discipline does not change between modes — only the model behind the call.

skills/tdd/references/java.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# TDD in Java
+
+The Iron Law and Red-Green-Refactor in `SKILL.md` apply unchanged. This file replaces
+the Go-Specific TDD Notes for Java. JUnit 5 (Jupiter) throughout.
+
+## The first red is a compile error, and that is correct
+
+`cannot find symbol: method splitVat` is a legitimate red. Do not stub the method with
+`throw new UnsupportedOperationException()` to make the module compile — that is
+production code before a failing test.
+
+## Table-driven: `@ParameterizedTest`
+
+```java
+@ParameterizedTest(name = "{0}")
+@MethodSource("vatCases")
+void roundsHalfToEven(String name, long amountMinor, BigDecimal rate, long net, long vat) {
+    assertEquals(new Split(net, vat), VatSplitter.split(amountMinor, rate));
+}
+
+static Stream<Arguments> vatCases() {
+    return Stream.of(
+        Arguments.of("tie rounds down to even", 14L,    new BigDecimal("0.12"), 12L,    2L),
+        Arguments.of("tie rounds up to even",   42L,    new BigDecimal("0.12"), 38L,    4L),
+        Arguments.of("exact division",          12500L, new BigDecimal("0.25"), 10000L, 2500L)
+    );
+}
+```
+
+`name = "{0}"` puts the case label in the report — the `t.Run` analogue. `@CsvSource` is
+terser for primitives; `@MethodSource` is the one to use as soon as a case carries a
+`BigDecimal` or a domain object.
+
+## Error cases get their own test
+
+```java
+@Test
+void rejectsNegativeAmount() {
+    var e = assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class,
+                         () -> VatSplitter.split(-1, new BigDecimal("0.25")));
+    assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("non-negative"));
+}
+```
+
+Assert on the message, not only the type — `IllegalArgumentException` is thrown by half
+the JDK, and a test that accepts any of them will keep passing for the wrong reason.
+
+## Money is `BigDecimal` or `long` minor units, never `double`
+
+`0.1 + 0.2 != 0.3` is not a rounding curiosity in a payments system, it is a defect.
+Where a rounding mode matters, state it: `setScale(0, RoundingMode.HALF_EVEN)`. Banker's
+rounding is the default expectation in Swedish accounting and is *not* Java's default.
+
+## Assertions
+
+Prefer AssertJ (`assertThat(x).isEqualTo(y)`) where the project already has it: the
+failure messages name the actual value. Where it does not, plain JUnit assertions are
+fine — do not add a dependency for aesthetics.
+
+`assertAll` is the closest analogue to Go's soft `assert`: it reports every failure in
+the group instead of stopping at the first.
+
+## Mocks
+
+Mockito is standard, and easy to overuse. Per `SKILL.md`, mock only across a system
+boundary. A mocked class you own tests the mock; a `@SpringBootTest` that mocks the
+repository tests neither the wiring nor the query.
+
+## Gates
+
+```bash
+./gradlew test            # the failing test
+./gradlew check           # static gate: compiler warnings, spotless, errorprone
+```
+
+Java has no `-race`. For concurrent code the honest substitutes are a stress test with
+`CountDownLatch` to force the interleaving, and jcstress for lock-free work. A pure
+function should strike that checklist box deliberately.

skills/tdd/references/python.md

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# TDD in Python
+
+The Iron Law, Red-Green-Refactor and the rationalization table in `SKILL.md` apply
+unchanged. This file replaces the Go-Specific TDD Notes for Python work.
+
+Canonical stack (`~/dev/.context/AGENT.md`): pytest + pytest-cov, `mypy --strict`, ruff,
+uv, src-layout. Not restated here — that table has one home.
+
+## The first red is an ImportError, and that is correct
+
+For a function that does not exist yet, the first run fails at collection:
+
+```
+E   ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'invoicing.vat'
+```
+
+That is a legitimate red. Read it, confirm it names the module you are about to write,
+and go to GREEN. **Do not create a stub raising `NotImplementedError` to make pytest
+collect.** A stub is production code written before a failing test.
+
+## Table-driven: `parametrize`, one behaviour per function
+
+```python
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    ("amount_minor", "rate", "expected"),
+    [
+        pytest.param(14, Decimal("0.12"), (12, 2), id="tie-rounds-down-to-even"),
+        pytest.param(42, Decimal("0.12"), (38, 4), id="tie-rounds-up-to-even"),
+        pytest.param(12500, Decimal("0.25"), (10000, 2500), id="exact-division"),
+        pytest.param(0, Decimal("0.25"), (0, 0), id="zero-is-not-an-error"),
+    ],
+)
+def test_split_vat_rounds_half_to_even(
+    amount_minor: int, rate: Decimal, expected: tuple[int, int]
+) -> None:
+    assert split_vat(amount_minor, rate) == expected
+```
+
+`id=` is the analogue of Go's `t.Run` name: it is what appears in the failure output and
+what you pass to `pytest -k`.
+
+**Do not port Go's `wantErr` column.** The Go exemplar branches inside the loop —
+`if tt.wantErr { assert.Error } else { assert.NoError }`. Translated literally that
+gives a conditional assertion and folds two behaviours into one test, which `SKILL.md`'s
+own quality table forbids ("One thing. 'and' in name? Split it."). Error cases get
+their own function:
+
+```python
+def test_split_vat_rejects_negative_amount() -> None:
+    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="amount_minor must be non-negative"):
+        split_vat(-1, Decimal("0.25"))
+```
+
+`match=` pins the message, not just the type. Go's `assert.Error` does not, and the
+stricter version is available here for free — use it.
+
+## `mypy --strict` is part of RED, not a chore after GREEN
+
+A red type-check is a red build.
+
+```bash
+uv run pytest tests/test_vat.py -x -q       # the failing test
+uv run mypy --strict src tests              # same gate, same phase
+```
+
+Under `--strict` every test function needs `-> None`, or it is an untyped def and the
+type-checker rejects the file — including the file that holds your failing test.
+
+## Layout and imports
+
+- `src/` layout, tests in a sibling `tests/`. This is the *opposite* of Go's
+  same-directory convention, and it buys black-box testing structurally: `from
+  invoicing.vat import split_vat` can only resolve against the installed package, so
+  the preference Go has to state explicitly is enforced here by the import system.
+- No `__init__.py` in `tests/` unless you need shared test packages; pytest's rootdir
+  handling copes, and an accidental package shadows names.
+- `conftest.py` holds fixtures shared across a directory. A fixture in a single test
+  file that only one test uses should be a plain function call instead — fixtures are
+  indirection, and indirection is only worth it at reuse.
+
+## No `require` vs `assert`
+
+Every pytest `assert` is fatal to its test; there is no continue-on-failure form. Where
+Go would use `assert` to collect several soft failures, either split the test or use
+`pytest.approx`/a single structural comparison:
+
+```python
+assert result == Invoice(id=InvoiceId("42"), net=10000, vat=2500)   # one assertion, whole shape
+```
+
+Comparing whole values beats three field assertions: the failure output shows the entire
+diff rather than the first field that differed.
+
+## Fixtures vs helpers
+
+- **Helper function** — when the setup is cheap and local. It reads top-to-bottom.
+- **Fixture** — when the setup is shared, or needs teardown, or needs a scope
+  (`session`, `module`) because it is expensive.
+- Set `__tracebackhide__ = True` in an assertion helper so failures point at the caller,
+  the way `t.Helper()` does in Go.
+
+## Coverage is not the concurrency gate
+
+`SKILL.md`'s checklist asks for the language's concurrency gate. Python has no `-race`
+equivalent, and pretending `pytest --cov` fills that slot is dishonest — coverage says
+which lines ran, not whether two threads can interleave badly. For a pure function,
+strike the box deliberately. For genuinely concurrent code (`asyncio`, threads), the
+substitute is a test that runs the interleaving you fear, plus `pytest-timeout` so a
+deadlock fails rather than hangs.

skills/tdd/references/rust.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# TDD in Rust
+
+The Iron Law and Red-Green-Refactor in `SKILL.md` apply unchanged. This file replaces
+the Go-Specific TDD Notes for Rust.
+
+## The first red is a compile error, and that is correct
+
+```
+error[E0425]: cannot find function `split_vat` in this scope
+```
+
+Legitimate — the compiler is the test runner's first phase. Read it, confirm it names
+the item you are about to write, and go to GREEN. Do not write a `todo!()` stub first;
+that is production code before a failing test. (`todo!()` is fine *during* GREEN as a
+branch you have not reached yet.)
+
+## Where tests live
+
+- **Unit tests** in the same file, in `mod tests` behind `#[cfg(test)]`. They can reach
+  private items — the white-box option Go spells `package foo`.
+- **Integration tests** in `tests/`, which link the crate as an external consumer and see
+  only the public API. This is the black-box default `SKILL.md` prefers; use it unless
+  the behaviour under test is genuinely private.
+
+```rust
+#[cfg(test)]
+mod tests {
+    use super::*;
+
+    #[test]
+    fn tie_rounds_down_to_even() {
+        assert_eq!(split_vat(14, dec!(0.12)).unwrap(), (12, 2));
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Table-driven: an array of cases
+
+```rust
+#[test]
+fn rounds_half_to_even() {
+    let cases = [
+        ("tie rounds down", 14u64, dec!(0.12), (12, 2)),
+        ("tie rounds up", 42, dec!(0.12), (38, 4)),
+        ("exact division", 12500, dec!(0.25), (10000, 2500)),
+    ];
+    for (name, amount, rate, want) in cases {
+        assert_eq!(split_vat(amount, rate).unwrap(), want, "case: {name}");
+    }
+}
+```
+
+The `"case: {name}"` message is the `t.Run` analogue — without it a failure names a line
+number and leaves you counting rows. If you want each case to be its own reported test,
+use `rstest`'s `#[case]`; that is a dependency, so justify it before adding it.
+
+## Error cases
+
+`Result` makes the Go `wantErr` column unnecessary — assert on the variant:
+
+```rust
+#[test]
+fn rejects_negative_amount() {
+    let err = split_vat_signed(-1, dec!(0.25)).unwrap_err();
+    assert!(matches!(err, VatError::NegativeAmount));
+}
+```
+
+`#[should_panic(expected = "...")]` is for genuine panics only — invariant violations,
+not expected error paths. A function whose contract includes "rejects negative input"
+should return `Err`, not panic, and a test that accepts a panic hides that design choice.
+
+## Gates
+
+```bash
+cargo test                    # the failing test
+cargo clippy -- -D warnings   # static gate, same phase as RED
+cargo fmt --check
+```
+
+`cargo test` compiles in debug, so integer overflow panics rather than wrapping — a
+release build will not. Where overflow matters, test the checked path explicitly
+(`checked_mul`), or you are testing debug-only behaviour.
+
+For unsafe code, `cargo +nightly miri test` is the nearest thing to Go's `-race`.
+Safe-only crates have no equivalent and should strike that checklist box deliberately.

skills/tdd/references/typescript.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# TDD in TypeScript
+
+The Iron Law and Red-Green-Refactor in `SKILL.md` apply unchanged. This file replaces
+the Go-Specific TDD Notes for TypeScript.
+
+Vitest is the default; Jest differs only in imports and a few matcher names, both noted
+where it matters.
+
+## The first red is a resolution error, and that is correct
+
+```
+Error: Failed to resolve import "./vat" from "src/vat.test.ts"
+```
+
+Legitimate. Do not create an empty module or a stub throwing `new Error("not
+implemented")` to get past collection — that is production code before a failing test.
+
+## Table-driven: `it.each`
+
+```ts
+describe('splitVat', () => {
+  it.each([
+    { amountMinor: 14,    rate: 0.12, expected: [12, 2],        name: 'tie rounds down to even' },
+    { amountMinor: 42,    rate: 0.12, expected: [38, 4],        name: 'tie rounds up to even' },
+    { amountMinor: 12500, rate: 0.25, expected: [10000, 2500],  name: 'exact division' },
+  ])('$name', ({ amountMinor, rate, expected }) => {
+    expect(splitVat(amountMinor, rate)).toEqual(expected)
+  })
+})
+```
+
+`$name` interpolates into the test title, which is the `t.Run` analogue. Prefer the
+object form over the array form — a positional tuple with five entries is unreadable at
+the point of failure.
+
+**Do not port Go's `wantErr` column.** Error cases get their own test:
+
+```ts
+it('rejects a negative amount', () => {
+  expect(() => splitVat(-1, 0.25)).toThrow(/must be non-negative/)
+})
+
+it('rejects a negative amount (async)', async () => {
+  await expect(splitVat(-1, 0.25)).rejects.toThrow(/must be non-negative/)
+})
+```
+
+The `await` on the async form is load-bearing. Without it the assertion returns a
+promise nobody checks, the test passes, and it will keep passing after you break the
+code. This is the single most common false-green in a TypeScript suite.
+
+## `tsc --noEmit` is part of RED
+
+A red type-check is a red build:
+
+```bash
+npx vitest run src/vat.test.ts     # the failing test
+npx tsc --noEmit                   # same gate, same phase
+```
+
+Vitest transpiles without type-checking, so a suite can be green while the code does not
+compile. `tsc --noEmit` is not optional here — it is the half of the gate the runner
+does not perform.
+
+## Equality matchers are not interchangeable
+
+- `toBe` — `Object.is`. For primitives and identity.
+- `toEqual` — structural, and **ignores `undefined` properties**: `{a: 1, b: undefined}`
+  equals `{a: 1}`. That is a real hole when the bug you are hunting is a missing field.
+- `toStrictEqual` — structural, respects `undefined`, and checks class identity. Default
+  to this one; reach for `toEqual` deliberately.
+
+## Mocks
+
+`vi.mock` (Jest: `jest.mock`) is hoisted above imports, so a factory referencing an
+outer variable throws at runtime. Use `vi.hoisted` when the mock needs shared state.
+Per `SKILL.md`, mock only across a system boundary — a mocked module you own is a test
+of your mock.
+
+## Async and fake timers
+
+- `vi.useFakeTimers()` needs a matching `vi.useRealTimers()` in teardown, or the next
+  file inherits frozen time and fails somewhere unrelated.
+- Prefer condition polling (`await vi.waitFor(...)`) over a fixed `setTimeout` — an
+  arbitrary wait is a flake with a schedule.

skills/telos-load/SKILL.md

@@ -82,3 +82,11 @@ created in a CAD session should trace to a TELOS GOAL. Every GOAL
 traces to a PROBLEM.
 
 Traceability chain: PROBLEM → GOAL → SPEC → TICKET → IMPL → TEST
+
+## Escalation
+
+Read-only. Loads intention context; changes nothing.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the brain is unreachable or returns nothing for the wing. Working
+from a remembered TELOS is the failure this skill exists to prevent — say the load failed
+rather than reconstructing it from memory.

skills/test-design/SKILL.md

@@ -309,3 +309,11 @@ Apply this checklist to every new test:
 - Load `tdd` skill for the full TDD workflow
 - Load `code-review` skill for test quality review during pre-merge review
 - See `clean-code/references/code-smells.md` for testing-specific smells
+
+## Escalation
+
+Read-only scoring of existing tests.
+
+Stop and hand back when: the tests are fine and the *design under test* is what makes them
+awkward. Hard-to-test is a design finding, not a test finding, and rewriting the tests
+around it hides the thing worth knowing.

skills/traceability/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+---
+name: traceability
+surfaces: [claude-code, library]
+summary: "Forward trace — requirement to decision to commit to verification to release, and what cannot be checked"
+use_when: "Proving why a change exists; auditing a claim; before an attestation or a compliance ask"
+description: Establish the forward trace for a change — requirement, decision, commit, verification, CI, release, closure — as a chain of links that are each checked rather than asserted. Names the links that cannot be verified from the repository instead of letting them pass as verified. Use when auditing why a change exists, preparing an attestation, or when a claim needs to be provable rather than plausible.
+---
+
+# Traceability
+
+## Overview
+
+A trace is not a story about how a change came to be. It is a chain of links, each of
+which is either **checked** or **named as unchecked**. The value is entirely in that
+distinction: a trace where every link is asserted is a narrative, and narratives are what
+audits exist to defeat.
+
+The chain in this estate:
+
+```
+issue (requirement) → comment (decision) → commit → test/gate → CI run on that sha
+    → release tag → closing comment (evidence)
+```
+
+Note where the decisions live: **in issue comments**, not issue bodies. A tool that reads
+issue titles will trace the wrong thing.
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Auditing why a change exists, especially one nobody remembers making
+- Preparing an attestation, a compliance answer, or a client-facing "how do you know"
+- Before claiming a requirement is satisfied
+- When a claim is repeated in several places, which is the condition under which nobody
+  checks it
+
+**Do not use for:** a change you are about to make. That is `adr` (the decision) and
+`spec-driven-dev` (the requirement). This skill reconstructs; it does not author.
+
+## The tool
+
+```sh
+skills/traceability/trace.sh <sha> [repo-path]
+```
+
+Prints what git can prove — the commit, its files, the test files it touched, the release
+that contains it, every issue it references as a URL — and then prints, every time, the
+three things git **cannot** prove. That last section is the point of the tool.
+
+## The sequence
+
+**1. Run the tool.** It does the mechanical half in one command.
+
+**2. Open the issues it printed, and read the comments.** The requirement is in the body;
+the decision is almost always in a comment, and so is the closure record. A trace built
+from commit messages alone will confidently cite an issue that says something else.
+
+**3. Match CI on the head sha, not on the branch.** "The pipeline is green" is not
+evidence about a commit. Find the run whose `head_sha` is this commit and read its
+conclusion — and check which *job* and which *step* passed, because a run can be red for a
+reason that has nothing to do with the gate you care about, and green overall while the
+gate you care about was skipped.
+
+The estate's `workflow_run_status` returns only the run-level conclusion — no jobs, no
+steps. For that breakdown you have to drop to the API:
+
+```sh
+op run --env-file ~/.op-env -- sh -c 'curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $DMABE_GITEA_API_TOKEN" \
+  "https://git.d-ma.be/api/v1/repos/<owner>/<repo>/actions/runs/<id>/jobs"'
+```
+
+Said explicitly because a step whose tooling dead-ends is exactly where a trace becomes
+"the run was green".
+
+**4. Check that the tests actually cover the behaviour.** A commit that touched a test
+file is not a commit that is verified. Read the assertions and ask what would have to
+break for them to fail. If nothing would, the link is decorative.
+
+**5. Probe the load-bearing claim — try to falsify it.** This is the step that separates a
+trace from a summary, and it is the one that finds things.
+
+Pick the claim the chain rests on, and attack it in a scratch copy:
+
+```sh
+git archive <sha> | (mkdir -p /tmp/probe && tar -x -C /tmp/probe)
+# then break exactly the thing the claim protects, and run the gate
+```
+
+If the gate stays green, the claim is false — regardless of how many places assert it.
+This is not hypothetical: the probe that shaped this skill falsified a "the list only
+shrinks" claim that was stated in five places in the repository and enforced in none.
+
+**6. Look for what cites the commit, not only what it cites.** A commit cannot reference
+an issue filed after it, and that is precisely where an outcome gets falsified. Search the
+tracker for the sha, across issues *and comments*, and `git log --all --grep=<sha>` for
+later commits referring back. In the run that shaped this skill, the issue proving the
+traced commit had *relocated* rather than fixed its defect was filed 90 minutes later and
+was reachable only this way.
+
+**7. Report unverifiable links as unverifiable.** Not as weak links, not as caveats at the
+end. Each gets its own line saying what would be needed to close it.
+
+## What a broken link looks like
+
+| Symptom | What it means |
+|---|---|
+| The commit cites `#37`, and `#37` describes something else | The reference is decoration; someone renumbered or misremembered |
+| A claim appears in five places and a check in none | Convention wearing a mechanism's clothes. Probe it |
+| The gate greps for a heading | Presence is not compliance. A heading with nothing under it passes |
+| `git describe` says unreleased | Usually stale local tags, not an unreleased commit. `git fetch --tags` first |
+| The requirement is a bare `#5` with no URL | Recoverable only while the tracker lives. Not traceable from the repo alone |
+| CI green, but on a different sha | The most common false link, and the easiest to accept by accident |
+
+## Output
+
+State the chain, then the gaps, in that order:
+
+```
+CHAIN
+  requirement  #36 item 3 (defect report)          → verified, read: body + comments
+  requirement  #19 (standing execution bar)        → verified, read
+  decision     comment 8509                        → verified; names the commit
+  commit       b616c51                             → verified
+    claim "nine skills, none named session_id"     → verified against b616c51^: 9/9
+    claim "session_id is the only required field"  → verified against the live tool schema
+  gate         bin/check-session-log               → RED on parent (17 errors), GREEN on it
+  wiring       Taskfile check step 5               → verified; CI runs task check
+  verification tests/check_session_log_test.sh     → verified, 4 cases, both directions
+  CI           run 4880, job "Check / Test"        → verified, head_sha matches, success
+  release      v0.13.3                             → verified against the REMOTE
+
+GAPS
+  - The gate greps the file, not the payload. Probe: stripped session_id from
+    every payload, left the word in prose — gate returned 0. FALSIFIED.
+  - Defect relocated, not removed: #39, filed 90 minutes later by the same
+    author, says so. The commit's outcome claim does not hold.
+```
+
+Four slots that are not optional, each learned by leaving them out:
+
+- **More than one requirement, and they differ in kind.** A defect report and a standing
+  policy bar are both requirements and collapsing them hides which one was not met.
+- **The gate, separately from the test.** A commit that ships a check has three artifacts,
+  not two, and the chain usually rests on the one in the middle.
+- **The RED/GREEN baseline.** Run the gate against the parent commit. Without it you have
+  shown a gate exists, not that it caught anything.
+- **The commit's factual claims, checked.** "Nine skills, none named it" is falsifiable in
+  one command. Without a slot for it, "commit → verified" means only "this sha exists".
+
+Gaps ranked by how much they matter, not by where you found them. A trace whose gap
+section is empty should be suspicious of itself.
+
+## Escalation
+
+Read-only. Reports the chain; changes nothing, and closes no issue on the strength of
+what it finds.
+
+Stop and hand back when: a link's evidence is outside anything you can reach — a tracker
+you cannot read, a CI system you have no access to, a decision made in conversation. Say
+which link and what would close it. An inferred link presented as a traced one is worse
+than a gap, because the gap is honest and the inference is citable.
+
+Also stop before *acting* on a falsified claim. Finding that a gate does not enforce what
+it says is a finding; deciding what to do about it is the owner's call.
+
+## Cross-References
+
+- `lineage` — the same discipline backwards: this asks "does the chain hold", that asks
+  "was it tried before and why did it stop".
+- `adr` — the decision layer of the chain. A trace that reaches an ADR has found the
+  reasoning; a trace that reaches only a commit message has found a summary of it.

skills/traceability/trace.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# trace.sh — the forward trace for one commit, and an honest list of what it
+# could not check.
+#
+# The chain this estate actually uses:
+#
+#   issue (requirement) -> comment (decision) -> commit -> test/gate -> CI run
+#     -> release tag -> closing comment
+#
+# git can prove the middle of that and nothing else. The issue bodies, the
+# comments where decisions actually live, and the CI run are all tracker state.
+# So this prints what git knows and then names, with URLs, the links a human has
+# to follow — because a link nobody checked must not read like a verified one.
+#
+# Usage: trace.sh <sha> [repo-path]
+#
+# Read-only.
+
+set -u
+
+[ $# -ge 1 ] || { echo "usage: trace.sh <sha> [repo-path]" >&2; exit 2; }
+SHA=$1
+REPO=${2:-.}
+
+git -C "$REPO" rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 || {
+  echo "trace: $REPO is not a git repository" >&2; exit 2; }
+git -C "$REPO" rev-parse --verify --quiet "$SHA^{commit}" >/dev/null || {
+  echo "trace: $SHA is not a commit in $REPO" >&2; exit 2; }
+
+TOP=$(git -C "$REPO" rev-parse --show-toplevel)
+ORIGIN=$(git -C "$REPO" config --get remote.origin.url 2>/dev/null || true)
+# Never print the URL as configured: url.insteadOf can expand it into a live
+# token. Reduce it to owner/repo and use that.
+SLUG=$(printf '%s' "$ORIGIN" | sed -E 's#\.git$##; s#^.*[/:]([^/]+/[^/]+)$#\1#' 2>/dev/null || true)
+
+section() { printf '\n== %s ==\n' "$1"; }
+
+section "Commit"
+git -C "$REPO" log -1 --format='%h  %ad  %an%n%n%B' --date=short "$SHA"
+
+section "Files"
+git -C "$REPO" show --stat --format='' "$SHA"
+
+section "Verification it touched"
+tests=$(git -C "$REPO" show --name-only --format='' "$SHA" \
+  | grep -Ei '(^|/)(tests?|spec)/|_test\.|\.test\.|_spec\.' || true)
+if [ -n "$tests" ]; then
+  printf '%s\n' "$tests"
+else
+  printf 'none — this commit changed no test or spec file.\n'
+  printf 'That is not automatically wrong (docs, config), but if it changed behaviour\n'
+  printf 'it means the change has no verification of its own.\n'
+fi
+
+section "Released in"
+tag=$(git -C "$REPO" describe --tags --contains "$SHA" 2>/dev/null | sed 's/[~^].*//' || true)
+if [ -n "$tag" ]; then
+  printf '%s   (LOCAL tags only — confirm with: git ls-remote --tags origin)\n' "$tag"
+else
+  printf 'no release contains this commit in THIS checkout.\n'
+  printf 'Local tags go stale — run `git fetch --tags` and re-check before\n'
+  printf 'concluding it was never released.\n'
+fi
+
+section "Referenced issues"
+refs=$(git -C "$REPO" log -1 --format='%B' "$SHA" | grep -oE '#[0-9]+' | sort -u || true)
+if [ -n "$refs" ]; then
+  for r in $refs; do
+    n=${r#\#}
+    if [ -n "$SLUG" ]; then
+      printf '%s  ->  https://git.d-ma.be/%s/issues/%s\n' "$r" "$SLUG" "$n"
+    else
+      printf '%s\n' "$r"
+    fi
+  done
+else
+  printf 'none — the commit cites no issue, so its requirement is unrecorded.\n'
+fi
+
+section "Issues that cite THIS commit"
+printf 'Not searchable from the commit — an issue filed after it cannot appear in\n'
+printf 'its message, and that is exactly where an outcome gets falsified. Check:\n\n'
+printf '  git -C %s log --all --grep=%s   # later commits referring back\n' "$REPO" "$SHA"
+if [ -n "$SLUG" ]; then
+  printf '  tracker search for "%s" across issues AND comments\n' "$SHA"
+fi
+printf '\nIn the run that shaped this tool, the issue that falsified the traced\n'
+printf 'commit was filed 90 minutes after it and was reachable only this way.\n'
+
+section "Cannot verify from here"
+cat <<'TXT'
+git proves the commit, its files, and which tag contains it. It cannot prove:
+
+  1. That the issues above say what the commit claims they say. The DECISION is
+     usually in a comment, not the issue body — open them and read the comments.
+  2. That CI actually passed on this exact sha. A green pipeline elsewhere is not
+     evidence about this commit; match on head_sha.
+  3. That the tests listed above assert the behaviour this commit added. A test
+     file touched is not a behaviour covered.
+  4. That any gate this commit ships enforces what its message says it does.
+     Probe it: break exactly the thing the claim protects, in a scratch copy,
+     and see whether the gate goes red.
+
+None of the three is a formality. Each has been the broken link in this estate:
+a claim asserted in five places and enforced in none, a red run whose gate had
+passed, and a gate that greps for a heading and calls it a contract.
+TXT

skills/trainer/SKILL.md

@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ Pass-rate is computed downstream by the `/pass-rate` HTTP endpoint, which
 treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 
 **At end of `read` phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "trainer", phase: "read", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "trainer", phase: "read", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **At end of `write` phase:**
-- `session_log` with `{skill: "trainer", phase: "write", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", duration_ms: <wall-clock>, project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
+- `session_log` with `{session_id: "<this session's id>", skill: "trainer", phase: "write", final_status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip", message: "<one-line summary>", project_root: "<absolute path>"}`
 
 **Phases for this skill:** read, write
 
@@ -243,11 +243,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
 - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached.
 - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (e.g. no candidates passed the gate, write skipped).
 
-**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data.
+**Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
-
-## Mode 2 Routing Note
-
-Trainer is the same shape as `session-retrospective` — long-context reading, mechanical filtering — and is a Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6, treat as Mode 1 only.
 
 ## Cross-References
 

tests/check_escalation_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Tests for bin/check-escalation.
+#
+# #5 asked whether SKILL.md needs first-class failure/escalation fields and
+# decided: not frontmatter (nothing reads it), a body section (the model reads
+# that). #37 then had to define WHICH skills need one, and every obvious answer
+# was bad — a hardcoded list rots, content sniffing is unfalsifiable, a
+# frontmatter flag is the rejected option through the back door.
+#
+# So there is no acting set. EVERY skill answers the question; a read-only one
+# answers it in a line. The classification problem disappears, and "this skill
+# never hands back" becomes a stated claim rather than an absence.
+#
+# bin/escalation-pending.txt is a ratchet for skills whose real rule has not
+# been written yet. It is self-cleaning: a skill that has a section AND is still
+# listed fails, so the list cannot silently outlive its reason.
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+SUT="$ROOT/bin/check-escalation"
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+WORK=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/check_escalation_test.$$
+
+if [ ! -f "$SUT" ]; then
+  printf 'FAIL: %s does not exist\n' "$SUT"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+cleanup() { rm -rf "$WORK"; }
+trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
+
+# fixture <name> — an empty checkout with a bin/ for the pending list.
+fixture() {
+  _f="$WORK/$1"
+  mkdir -p "$_f/skills" "$_f/bin"
+  : > "$_f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+  printf '%s' "$_f"
+}
+
+# skill <root> <name> <has-section>
+skill() {
+  mkdir -p "$1/skills/$2"
+  {
+    printf -- '---\nname: %s\ndescription: d\n---\n\n# %s\n' "$2" "$2"
+    [ "$3" = yes ] && printf '\n## Escalation\n\nStop and hand back when X. Hand back by: saying so.\n'
+  } > "$1/skills/$2/SKILL.md"
+}
+
+# expect <rc> <label> <fixture> [needle]
+expect() {
+  _want=$1; _label=$2; _fx=$3; _needle=${4:-}
+  _out=$(sh "$SUT" "$_fx" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+  if [ "$_rc" -ne "$_want" ]; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s (want rc=%s got %s)\n%s\n' "$_label" "$_want" "$_rc" "$_out"; return
+  fi
+  if [ -n "$_needle" ] && ! printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -q "$_needle"; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s (rc ok, report never says %s)\n%s\n' "$_label" "$_needle" "$_out"; return
+  fi
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$_label"
+}
+
+f=$(fixture ok); skill "$f" alpha yes
+expect 0 'a skill with an Escalation section passes' "$f"
+
+f=$(fixture missing); skill "$f" alpha no
+expect 1 'a skill with no section fails, naming it' "$f" 'alpha'
+
+f=$(fixture pending); skill "$f" alpha no; printf 'alpha\n' > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+expect 0 'a listed skill is allowed through the ratchet' "$f"
+
+f=$(fixture done); skill "$f" alpha yes; printf 'alpha\n' > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+expect 1 'a listed skill that now HAS a section fails — remove it from the list' "$f" 'escalation-pending'
+
+f=$(fixture stale); skill "$f" alpha yes; printf 'ghost\n' > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+expect 1 'a listed skill that does not exist fails' "$f" 'ghost'
+
+f=$(fixture comments); skill "$f" alpha no
+printf '# a comment, and a blank line follow\n\nalpha\n' > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+expect 0 'comments and blank lines in the list are ignored' "$f"
+
+# --- the ratchet must actually ratchet ---------------------------------------
+# Five places in this repo claimed the pending list "only shrinks" and nothing
+# enforced it. A traceability probe falsified that in one run: add an unsectioned
+# skill, append it to the list, gate returns 0. A convention stated five times is
+# still a convention.
+#
+# Enforcement compares against the list as committed at HEAD, so the fixtures
+# below need a real git repo.
+
+git_fixture() {
+  _f="$WORK/$1"
+  mkdir -p "$_f/skills" "$_f/bin"
+  ( cd "$_f" && git init -q . && git config user.email t@example.com && git config user.name test )
+  skill "$_f" alpha no
+  printf 'alpha\n' > "$_f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+  ( cd "$_f" && git add -A && git commit -qm baseline )
+  printf '%s' "$_f"
+}
+
+f=$(git_fixture ratchet_same)
+expect 0 'an unchanged list passes' "$f"
+
+f=$(git_fixture ratchet_shrink)
+skill "$f" alpha yes
+: > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+expect 0 'removing an entry (and writing its section) passes' "$f"
+
+f=$(git_fixture ratchet_grow)
+skill "$f" beta no
+printf 'alpha\nbeta\n' > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+expect 1 'adding a NEW entry fails — the list only shrinks' "$f" 'beta'
+
+# Outside a git repo the comparison is impossible; that must not be silent.
+f=$(fixture ratchet_nogit); skill "$f" alpha no
+printf 'alpha\n' > "$f/bin/escalation-pending.txt"
+_out=$(sh "$SUT" "$f" 2>&1)
+if printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -qi 'cannot verify'; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   an unverifiable ratchet says so rather than passing silently\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL an unverifiable ratchet says so rather than passing silently\n%s\n' "$_out"
+fi
+
+printf '\ncheck_escalation: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/check_session_log_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Tests for bin/check-session-log.
+#
+# The regression: nine skills documented a session_log payload and not one of
+# them named `session_id` — the tool's ONLY required field. Every documented
+# call was incomplete, so an agent following any of them either failed the call
+# or invented an id, and invented ids do not group. Found by a pressure test
+# against `debug`, then found to be fleet-wide (#36).
+#
+# Also gated: `duration_ms: <wall-clock>`, which an agent cannot measure. A
+# documented field nobody can honestly populate gets fabricated or silently
+# dropped; both are worse than omitting it.
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+SUT="$ROOT/bin/check-session-log"
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+WORK=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/check_session_log_test.$$
+
+if [ ! -f "$SUT" ]; then
+  printf 'FAIL: %s does not exist\n' "$SUT"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+cleanup() { rm -rf "$WORK"; }
+trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
+
+# fixture <name> <body> — a checkout with one skill whose SKILL.md is <body>.
+fixture() {
+  _f="$WORK/$1"
+  mkdir -p "$_f/skills/alpha"
+  printf -- '---\nname: alpha\ndescription: a\n---\n\n%s\n' "$2" > "$_f/skills/alpha/SKILL.md"
+  printf '%s' "$_f"
+}
+
+# expect <rc> <label> <fixture> [needle]
+expect() {
+  _want=$1; _label=$2; _fx=$3; _needle=${4:-}
+  _out=$(sh "$SUT" "$_fx" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+  if [ "$_rc" -ne "$_want" ]; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s (want rc=%s got %s)\n%s\n' "$_label" "$_want" "$_rc" "$_out"; return
+  fi
+  if [ -n "$_needle" ] && ! printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -q "$_needle"; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s (rc ok, report never says %s)\n%s\n' "$_label" "$_needle" "$_out"; return
+  fi
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$_label"
+}
+
+expect 0 'a skill that never mentions session_log is fine' \
+  "$(fixture quiet 'Just a skill. No logging here.')"
+
+expect 0 'a documented call naming session_id passes' \
+  "$(fixture good 'Call `session_log` with `{session_id: "<id>", skill: "alpha", phase: "red", final_status: "pass"}`')"
+
+expect 1 'a documented call omitting session_id fails' \
+  "$(fixture bad 'Call `session_log` with `{skill: "alpha", phase: "red", final_status: "pass"}`')" \
+  'session_id'
+
+expect 1 'documenting duration_ms as wall-clock fails' \
+  "$(fixture clock 'Call `session_log` with `{session_id: "<id>", skill: "alpha", duration_ms: <wall-clock>}`')" \
+  'duration_ms'
+
+# --- the gate must read the PAYLOAD, not the file ---------------------------
+# A traceability probe falsified the original: it grepped the whole file for the
+# string "session_id", so stripping the field from every documented payload and
+# leaving the word once in prose passed cleanly. The exact regression the gate
+# exists to prevent was back in the file and the gate said nothing.
+
+expect 1 'a payload without session_id fails even when prose mentions the word' \
+  "$(fixture prose 'The tool has a required session_id field.
+
+Call `session_log` with `{skill: "alpha", phase: "red", final_status: "pass"}`')" \
+  'session_id'
+
+expect 1 'one bad payload among several fails' \
+  "$(fixture mixed 'Call `session_log` with `{session_id: "<id>", skill: "alpha", phase: "red"}`
+
+Then `session_log` with `{skill: "alpha", phase: "green", final_status: "pass"}`')" \
+  'session_id'
+
+# duration_ms was banned by matching exactly one spelling of it — the historical
+# one. Both of these passed the original gate.
+expect 1 'duration_ms with a JSON-quoted key fails' \
+  "$(fixture jsonkey 'Call `session_log` with `{session_id: "<id>", "duration_ms": <wall-clock>}`')" \
+  'duration_ms'
+
+expect 1 'duration_ms described in prose rather than angle brackets fails' \
+  "$(fixture prosems 'Call `session_log` with `{session_id: "<id>", duration_ms: elapsed wall-clock ms}`')" \
+  'duration_ms'
+
+# A real measurement is allowed: the objection is to a placeholder no agent can
+# fill, not to the field.
+expect 0 'a duration_ms carrying a real value is allowed' \
+  "$(fixture realms 'Call `session_log` with `{session_id: "<id>", duration_ms: 1430}`')"
+
+printf '\ncheck_session_log: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/check_tolerates_unverifiable_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# `task check` must survive a check that reports "could not verify".
+#
+# The regression these exist for: bin/check-mcp-env exits 2 to mean "I could
+# not run — no jq, or no env-file", which the gate deliberately treats as a
+# reported NOTE rather than a failure. The Taskfile said exactly that:
+#
+#   "$DIR/check-mcp-env" "$DIR/.mcp.json" "$HOME/.op-env"
+#   case $? in 0) ;; 2) echo "NOTE: ..." ;; *) fail=1 ;; esac
+#
+# and it did not work. Task runs each cmds block under `sh -e`, so a bare
+# command exiting non-zero aborts the shell *before* `case $?` is ever
+# reached. The whole gate died with `exit status 2`. Locally the check found
+# jq and exited 0, so it went green; CI has neither jq nor ~/.op-env, so main
+# went red on the very commit that added it (skills run #57, 2026-09-07).
+#
+# A tolerated exit code that is only tolerated on the host where it never
+# fires is not tolerated at all. This pins the tolerance itself.
+#
+# No mocking: pointing HOME at an empty directory removes ~/.op-env, which is
+# exactly the condition CI runs under, so check-mcp-env genuinely exits 2.
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+
+ok() { pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$1"; }
+no() { fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n' "$1"; }
+
+if ! command -v task >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  printf '  SKIP: task not installed -- cannot exercise the gate\n'
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+TMP=$(mktemp -d)
+trap 'rm -rf "$TMP"' EXIT
+
+# Sanity: the precondition must actually hold, or the test proves nothing.
+# An empty HOME means no ~/.op-env, so check-mcp-env cannot verify anything.
+"$ROOT/bin/check-mcp-env" "$ROOT/.mcp.json" "$TMP/.op-env" >/dev/null 2>&1
+rc=$?
+if [ "$rc" -eq 2 ]; then
+  ok 'precondition: check-mcp-env exits 2 when the env-file is absent'
+else
+  no "precondition: expected check-mcp-env to exit 2, got $rc"
+fi
+
+# The assertion. `task check` must still pass, and must say why it could not
+# verify -- silence would mean the check was skipped rather than tolerated.
+out=$(HOME="$TMP" task --dir "$ROOT" check 2>&1)
+rc=$?
+
+if [ "$rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  ok 'task check passes when MCP env wiring cannot be verified'
+else
+  no "task check exited $rc when check-mcp-env reported unverifiable"
+  printf '%s\n' "$out" | sed 's/^/       | /' | tail -8
+fi
+
+if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -q 'unverified'; then
+  ok 'the unverifiable check is reported, not silently skipped'
+else
+  no 'no NOTE reported -- an unverifiable check must never look like a pass'
+fi
+
+printf '  %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/doctor_test.sh

@@ -24,6 +24,18 @@ if [ ! -f "$DOCTOR" ]; then
   exit 1
 fi
 
+# The toolchain check (golangci-lint build-Go vs GOROOT) reads the real host
+# unless we say otherwise, which made every unrelated fixture fail on a machine
+# whose golangci-lint is genuinely stale. Give the whole suite a matching fake
+# pair so only the cases that OPT IN exercise that check.
+STUB_BIN="$WORK/_stub_bin"
+mkdir -p "$STUB_BIN"
+printf '#!/bin/sh\nprintf "golangci-lint has version 2.0.0 built with go1.27.0 from abc\\n"\n' > "$STUB_BIN/golangci-lint"
+printf '#!/bin/sh\ncase "$1" in version) printf "go version go1.27.0 linux/amd64\\n";; *) printf "\\n";; esac\n' > "$STUB_BIN/go"
+chmod +x "$STUB_BIN/golangci-lint" "$STUB_BIN/go"
+PATH="$STUB_BIN:$PATH"
+export PATH
+
 cleanup() { rm -rf "$WORK"; }
 trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
 
@@ -224,5 +236,142 @@ manifest "$f/ck" 0.7.0
 manifest "$f/home/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/mathias" 0.9.0
 assert_fails "$f" '0.9.0' 'a newer marketplace clone is reported'
 
+# --- 9. --online: the release this host has never fetched ------------------
+# Everything above compares copies already on the host, so a host where the
+# checkout, the marketplace clone and the installed plugin all agree reads as
+# clean while being a release behind origin. Offline by design (#30); this is
+# the opt-in that closes it (#38).
+#
+# The remote lookup is stubbed through $DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD so no test needs
+# a network or a real remote.
+
+online_fixture() {
+  _f=$(new_fixture "$1"); wire_clean "$_f"
+  installed_state "$_f" "$2"
+  manifest "$_f/ck" "$2"
+  printf '%s' "$_f"
+}
+
+# assert_online <fixture> <stub-tag> <want-rc> <needle> <label>
+assert_online() {
+  _out=$(HOME="$1/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$1/ck" \
+         DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD="printf %s\\n $2" sh "$DOCTOR" --online 2>&1); _rc=$?
+  if [ "$3" -eq 0 ] && [ "$_rc" -ne 0 ]; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n       exited %s on a current host\n       got: %s\n' "$5" "$_rc" "$_out"; return
+  fi
+  if [ "$3" -ne 0 ] && [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n       exited 0; staleness went unreported\n' "$5"; return
+  fi
+  if [ -n "$4" ] && ! printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -q -- "$4"; then
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n       report never mentions "%s"\n       got: %s\n' "$5" "$4" "$_out"; return
+  fi
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$5"
+}
+
+f=$(online_fixture behind 0.8.0)
+assert_online "$f" v0.9.0 1 '0.9.0' '--online reports a release the host has not fetched'
+
+f=$(online_fixture current 0.9.0)
+assert_online "$f" v0.9.0 0 '' '--online stays quiet when the host is current'
+
+# A host AHEAD of the newest tag is the normal state between a release commit
+# and its tag; that is not drift (same reasoning as check's ordering rule).
+f=$(online_fixture ahead 0.9.1)
+assert_online "$f" v0.9.0 0 '' '--online does not complain about being ahead'
+
+# Without the flag, no lookup happens at all — the stub would report a newer
+# tag and must be ignored.
+f=$(online_fixture offline 0.8.0)
+_out=$(HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" \
+       DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD="printf v9.9.9\\n" sh "$DOCTOR" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+if [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   the default run performs no remote lookup\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL the default run performs no remote lookup\n       got: %s\n' "$_out"
+fi
+
+# A remote that cannot be reached is not drift and must not be reported as it.
+# An unreachable remote produces no output at all, so it gets its own run
+# rather than an empty stub argument — "prints nothing" and "prints an empty
+# string" are different things and only the first is the case under test.
+f=$(online_fixture unreachable 0.9.0)
+_out=$(HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" \
+       DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD="true" sh "$DOCTOR" --online 2>&1); _rc=$?
+if [ "$_rc" -ne 0 ] && printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -q 'could not'; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   --online reports an unreachable remote as its own fault\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL --online reports an unreachable remote as its own fault\n       rc=%s got: %s\n' "$_rc" "$_out"
+fi
+
+# --- toolchain: golangci-lint must be built with Go >= GOROOT ---------------
+# Measured on koala 2026-09-08 (infra#375, second recurrence): golangci-lint
+# 2.11.4 built with go1.26.1 against a go1.27.0 GOROOT PANICS on any Go repo --
+#
+#   panic: file requires newer Go version go1.27 (application built with go1.26)
+#
+# and the earlier form of the same fault printed a typecheck error naming YOUR
+# file, so the natural response is to debug code that is fine. It cost time in
+# two repos. CI never sees it (the runner image matches), so it breaks only the
+# local `task check` that AGENT.md requires before every push.
+#
+# The fixtures inject fake `go` and `golangci-lint` on PATH; nothing here reads
+# the real host toolchain, so the suite still passes on a machine without Go.
+mk_toolchain() { # $1=fixture  $2=lint-build-go  $3=goroot-go   ("" = absent)
+  _b="$1/bin"; mkdir -p "$_b"
+  if [ -n "$2" ]; then
+    printf '#!/bin/sh\nprintf "golangci-lint has version 2.11.4 built with %s from abc on 2026-01-01\\n"\n' "$2" > "$_b/golangci-lint"
+    chmod +x "$_b/golangci-lint"
+  fi
+  if [ -n "$3" ]; then
+    printf '#!/bin/sh\ncase "$1" in version) printf "go version %s linux/amd64\\n";; *) printf "\\n";; esac\n' "$3" > "$_b/go"
+    chmod +x "$_b/go"
+  fi
+  printf '%s' "$_b"
+}
+
+f=$(new_fixture golangci_old); wire_clean "$f"
+b=$(mk_toolchain "$f" go1.26.1 go1.27.0)
+_out=$(PATH="$b:$PATH" HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" "$DOCTOR" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+if [ "$_rc" -ne 0 ] && printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -qi 'golangci'; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   golangci-lint older than GOROOT is reported\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL golangci-lint older than GOROOT is reported\n       rc=%s got: %s\n' "$_rc" "$_out"
+fi
+
+# Matching versions are the normal case and must stay silent.
+f=$(new_fixture golangci_ok); wire_clean "$f"
+b=$(mk_toolchain "$f" go1.27.0 go1.27.0)
+_out=$(PATH="$b:$PATH" HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" "$DOCTOR" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+if [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   golangci-lint matching GOROOT is silent\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL golangci-lint matching GOROOT is silent\n       rc=%s got: %s\n' "$_rc" "$_out"
+fi
+
+# A NEWER lint than GOROOT is fine -- the constraint is one-directional.
+f=$(new_fixture golangci_newer); wire_clean "$f"
+b=$(mk_toolchain "$f" go1.28.0 go1.27.0)
+_out=$(PATH="$b:$PATH" HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" "$DOCTOR" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+if [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   golangci-lint newer than GOROOT is not a fault\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL golangci-lint newer than GOROOT is not a fault\n       rc=%s got: %s\n' "$_rc" "$_out"
+fi
+
+# Fail OPEN on anything unparseable. doctor runs in a SessionStart hook on every
+# machine; a toolchain it cannot read is not a fault it may assert. (A host with
+# no Go at all takes the same path -- command -v simply misses.)
+f=$(new_fixture golangci_garbled); wire_clean "$f"
+_b="$f/bin"; mkdir -p "$_b"
+printf '#!/bin/sh\nprintf "golangci-lint dev build\\n"\n' > "$_b/golangci-lint"
+printf '#!/bin/sh\nprintf "go version devel\\n"\n' > "$_b/go"
+chmod +x "$_b/golangci-lint" "$_b/go"
+_out=$(PATH="$_b:$PATH" HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" "$DOCTOR" 2>&1); _rc=$?
+if [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   an unreadable toolchain version is not asserted as a fault\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL an unreadable toolchain version is not asserted as a fault\n       rc=%s got: %s\n' "$_rc" "$_out"
+fi
+
 printf '\ndoctor: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
 [ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/install_test.sh

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ SUT="$ROOT/install.sh"
 
 pass=0
 fail=0
+skipped=0
 WORK=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/install_test.$$
 
 if [ ! -f "$SUT" ]; then
@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ run_install() {
     AGENTS_SKILLS_DIR="$_f/home/.agents/skills" \
     CRUSH_SKILLS_DIR="$_f/home/.config/crush/skills" \
     OPENCODE_SKILLS_DIR="$_f/home/.config/opencode/skills" \
+    ANTIGRAVITY_SKILLS_JSON="$_f/home/.gemini/config/skills.json" \
     SKILLS_EXTRA_SOURCES="$_extra" \
     bash "$SUT" 2>&1)
   rc=$?
@@ -156,6 +158,40 @@ else
   no 'configured sources are recorded for doctor' "$out"
 fi
 
+# --- Antigravity: jq is optional, so BOTH branches must be tested -----------
+# These three cases inherited whatever jq the host happened to have. koala has
+# it, the CI runner does not, so they passed locally and failed in CI — the
+# classic works-on-my-machine gate. install.sh treats jq as optional by design,
+# which means the skip is a contract and needs a test of its own.
+
+# run_install_nojq <fixture> — same as run_install, with the jq lookup pointed
+# at a binary that does not exist. Deterministic regardless of the host.
+run_install_nojq() {
+  _f=$1
+  _out=$(HOME="$_f/home" \
+    SKILLS_SKIP_FETCH=1 \
+    SKILLS_CHECKOUT_DIR="$_f/ck" \
+    AGENTS_SKILLS_DIR="$_f/home/.agents/skills" \
+    CRUSH_SKILLS_DIR="$_f/home/.config/crush/skills" \
+    OPENCODE_SKILLS_DIR="$_f/home/.config/opencode/skills" \
+    SKILLS_JQ="definitely-not-jq-$$" \
+    bash "$SUT" 2>&1)
+  rc=$?
+  printf '%s' "$_out"
+}
+
+f=$(new_fixture antigravity_nojq)
+out=$(run_install_nojq "$f")
+if [ -e "$f/home/.gemini/config/skills.json" ]; then
+  no 'without jq, no skills.json is written' "$out"
+elif ! printf '%s' "$out" | grep -qi 'jq not found'; then
+  no 'without jq, the skip is reported' "$out"
+elif [ ! -L "$f/home/.agents/skills/alpha" ]; then
+  no 'without jq, the other harnesses are still wired' "$out"
+else
+  ok 'without jq, Antigravity is skipped and the rest still wires'
+fi
+
 # --- 8. surfaces: the library link set is not "every skill" -----------------
 # claude.ai has no shell, no cluster and no checkout, so a chat-only skill
 # linked into Crush is a skill that can never fire, competing for selection
@@ -183,5 +219,59 @@ else
   no 'a source with no surfaces convention is linked as-is' "$out"
 fi
 
-printf '\ninstall: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+# --- 9-11. Antigravity's merge behaviour, only where jq exists ---------------
+# These three assert what jq DOES. install.sh treats jq as optional, so on a
+# host without it there is nothing to assert — and failing there is what turned
+# main red: they passed on koala (jq present) and failed on the runner (absent).
+# A skipped case is honest; a case that fails because the host lacks an optional
+# dependency is a false red, and false reds are how a suite stops being read.
+if ! command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  skipped=$((skipped + 3))
+  printf '  SKIP jq absent — Antigravity merge behaviour not covered on this host (3 cases)\n'
+else
+  # skills.json entries must point at $AGENTS_DIR — that carries the
+  # surfaces-filtering, collision handling and multi-source merge. Pointing at
+  # the checkout directly would give Antigravity a different skill set than
+  # every other harness.
+  f=$(new_fixture antigravity)
+  out=$(run_install "$f")
+  AG="$f/home/.gemini/config/skills.json"
+  if [ ! -f "$AG" ]; then
+    no 'Antigravity skills.json is created' "$out"
+  else
+    registered=$(jq -r --arg p "$f/home/.agents/skills" '[.entries[]? | select(.path == $p)] | length' "$AG")
+    if [ "$registered" = "1" ]; then
+      ok 'Antigravity registers the managed agents dir, not the raw checkout'
+    else
+      no 'Antigravity registers the managed agents dir, not the raw checkout' "$(cat "$AG")"
+    fi
+  fi
+
+  f=$(new_fixture antigravity_idempotent)
+  run_install "$f" >/dev/null
+  out=$(run_install "$f")
+  AG="$f/home/.gemini/config/skills.json"
+  count=$(jq '.entries | length' "$AG" 2>/dev/null || echo "?")
+  if [ "$count" = "1" ]; then
+    ok 'Antigravity wiring is idempotent (no duplicate entries)'
+  else
+    no 'Antigravity wiring is idempotent (no duplicate entries)' "entries=$count"$'\n'"$out"
+  fi
+
+  # A user may hand-edit skills.json to point at their own personal skills dir
+  # (json_configs.md documents this). Our merge must not clobber it.
+  f=$(new_fixture antigravity_preserve)
+  mkdir -p "$f/home/.gemini/config"
+  printf '{"entries":[{"path":"/Users/mathias/personal-skills"}]}' > "$f/home/.gemini/config/skills.json"
+  out=$(run_install "$f")
+  AG="$f/home/.gemini/config/skills.json"
+  personal=$(jq -r '[.entries[]? | select(.path == "/Users/mathias/personal-skills")] | length' "$AG" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
+  if [ "$personal" = "1" ]; then
+    ok 'Antigravity wiring preserves pre-existing hand-authored entries'
+  else
+    no 'Antigravity wiring preserves pre-existing hand-authored entries' "$(cat "$AG")"$'\n'"$out"
+  fi
+fi
+
+printf '\ninstall: %d passed, %d failed, %d skipped\n' "$pass" "$fail" "$skipped"
 [ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/lineage_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Tests for skills/lineage/lineage.sh — the decision-archaeology helper.
+#
+# The techniques this automates are the ones people skip because they are
+# fiddly to type: `git log -S` to find when a thing was introduced AND removed,
+# --diff-filter=D to find files that once existed, and grepping decision records
+# for the term. A skill that only *describes* those is a skill that gets read and
+# not run (#11, #19's "small robust tools over prose").
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+SUT="$ROOT/skills/lineage/lineage.sh"
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+WORK=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lineage_test.$$
+
+if [ ! -f "$SUT" ]; then
+  printf 'FAIL: %s does not exist\n' "$SUT"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+cleanup() { rm -rf "$WORK"; }
+trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
+
+# A repo where a thing was built, written about, and then removed.
+mkdir -p "$WORK/repo/docs/adr"
+cd "$WORK/repo" || exit 1
+git init -q .
+git config user.email t@example.com
+git config user.name test
+
+printf 'func WidgetCache() {}\n' > cache.go
+git add -A && git commit -qm "feat: add WidgetCache for lookup speed"
+
+printf -- '---\nadr: 0001\ntitle: use a WidgetCache\n---\nWe chose WidgetCache over a database index.\n' > docs/adr/0001-widgetcache.md
+git add -A && git commit -qm "docs: record the WidgetCache decision"
+
+git rm -q cache.go
+git commit -qm "revert: drop WidgetCache, it went stale under concurrent writes"
+
+cd - >/dev/null || exit 1
+out=$(sh "$SUT" WidgetCache "$WORK/repo" 2>&1)
+
+check() {
+  if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -q "$1"; then
+    pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$2"
+  else
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n       output had no %s\n%s\n' "$2" "$1" "$out"
+  fi
+}
+
+check 'add WidgetCache'            'finds the commit that introduced it'
+check 'drop WidgetCache'           'finds the commit that removed it — the revival question'
+check '0001-widgetcache.md'        'finds the decision record naming it'
+check 'cache.go'                   'names the file that no longer exists'
+
+# A no-match must NOT be reported as evidence the idea is new. The first version
+# of this tool said "it means this is new here" and a pressure test caught it
+# asserting exactly that about the most-discussed removed feature in this repo —
+# the search term simply had a space in it. That is the inference the skill's own
+# anti-pattern table forbids, printed in the tool's voice.
+out=$(sh "$SUT" NeverExisted "$WORK/repo" 2>&1)
+if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -q 'NOT evidence the idea is new' \
+   && printf '%s' "$out" | grep -qi 'identifier'; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   a no-match refuses to imply novelty and suggests other terms\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL a no-match refuses to imply novelty and suggests other terms\n%s\n' "$out"
+fi
+
+# The repo actually searched is always stated — a confident null against the
+# wrong tree is this tool's worst failure mode, and the default is the cwd.
+out=$(sh "$SUT" WidgetCache "$WORK/repo" 2>&1)
+if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -q "searching: "; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   names the repo it searched\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL names the repo it searched\n%s\n' "$out"
+fi
+
+# The sources it cannot reach are named every run, so their absence never reads
+# as a null result.
+if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -q 'brain_query' && printf '%s' "$out" | grep -qi 'closed issues'; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   names the sources it cannot search\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL names the sources it cannot search\n%s\n' "$out"
+fi
+
+printf '\nlineage: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/mcp_config_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Tests for bin/check-mcp-env.
+#
+# The fault this gate exists for is silent, which is why it needs a gate at
+# all. An `.mcp.json` server whose Authorization header interpolates a
+# variable nothing in the session environment defines does not error: the
+# header goes out empty, the server answers 401, and Claude Code reports
+# "requires authentication". That is indistinguishable from a revoked or
+# expired credential, and on 2026-09-07 it cost a full investigation on koala
+# to establish that the credential was fine and the variable was simply never
+# set.
+#
+# So the property is: every ${VAR} a LIVE server interpolates must be a
+# variable the session env-file actually defines.
+#
+# The `_parked` block is deliberately exempt. Parked servers reference
+# variables nothing provides on purpose -- that is what parked means -- and a
+# gate that flagged them would be reporting the intended state as a fault.
+#
+# Fixtures drive the checker through argv, so no test touches the real host.
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+CHECK="$ROOT/bin/check-mcp-env"
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+WORK=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mcp_config_test.$$
+
+if [ ! -f "$CHECK" ]; then
+  printf 'FAIL: %s does not exist\n' "$CHECK"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+cleanup() { rm -rf "$WORK"; }
+trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
+mkdir -p "$WORK"
+
+if ! command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  printf 'SKIP: jq not installed -- bin/check-mcp-env cannot be exercised\n'
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+# ok <name> / bad <name> <detail>
+ok()  { pass=$((pass+1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$1"; }
+bad() { fail=$((fail+1)); printf '  FAIL %s  %s\n' "$1" "${2:-}"; }
+
+# run <mcp-json> <env-file> -> sets $rc and $out
+run() {
+  out=$("$CHECK" "$1" "$2" 2>&1); rc=$?
+}
+
+ENVFILE="$WORK/op-env"
+cat > "$ENVFILE" <<'ENVEOF'
+BRAIN_MCP_TOKEN=op://HomeLab/brain/token
+DMABE_GITEA_API_TOKEN=op://HomeLab/gitea/token
+ENVEOF
+
+# --- a live server whose variable IS defined ---------------------------------
+cat > "$WORK/good.json" <<'JSONEOF'
+{"mcpServers":{"brain":{"type":"http","url":"https://x/mcp",
+ "headers":{"Authorization":"Bearer ${BRAIN_MCP_TOKEN}"}}}}
+JSONEOF
+run "$WORK/good.json" "$ENVFILE"
+[ "$rc" -eq 0 ] && ok "defined variable passes" || bad "defined variable passes" "rc=$rc $out"
+
+# --- a live server whose variable is NOT defined ------------------------------
+# The exact shape that broke: the server looks correct and fails at runtime.
+cat > "$WORK/missing.json" <<'JSONEOF'
+{"mcpServers":{"gitea":{"type":"http","url":"https://x/mcp",
+ "headers":{"Authorization":"Bearer ${GITEA_MCP_STATIC_TOKEN}"}}}}
+JSONEOF
+run "$WORK/missing.json" "$ENVFILE"
+if [ "$rc" -ne 0 ]; then
+  case "$out" in
+    *gitea*GITEA_MCP_STATIC_TOKEN*) ok "undefined variable is flagged, naming server and variable" ;;
+    *) bad "undefined variable is flagged, naming server and variable" "report did not name both: $out" ;;
+  esac
+else
+  bad "undefined variable is flagged, naming server and variable" "rc=0"
+fi
+
+# --- a server with no headers at all (the `infra` shape) ----------------------
+# Unauthenticated by design. Nothing to resolve, so nothing to flag.
+cat > "$WORK/noauth.json" <<'JSONEOF'
+{"mcpServers":{"infra":{"type":"http","url":"https://x/mcp"}}}
+JSONEOF
+run "$WORK/noauth.json" "$ENVFILE"
+[ "$rc" -eq 0 ] && ok "header-less server is not flagged" || bad "header-less server is not flagged" "rc=$rc $out"
+
+# --- parked servers are exempt ------------------------------------------------
+cat > "$WORK/parked.json" <<'JSONEOF'
+{"mcpServers":{"brain":{"type":"http","url":"https://x/mcp",
+  "headers":{"Authorization":"Bearer ${BRAIN_MCP_TOKEN}"}}},
+ "_parked":{"_reason":"no identity provides these yet",
+  "cad":{"type":"http","url":"https://x/mcp",
+   "headers":{"Authorization":"Bearer ${CAD_MCP_TOKEN}"}}}}
+JSONEOF
+run "$WORK/parked.json" "$ENVFILE"
+if [ "$rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  ok "parked server is exempt"
+else
+  bad "parked server is exempt" "rc=$rc $out"
+fi
+
+# --- malformed JSON must not pass silently ------------------------------------
+# A config the checker cannot read is an unverified config, not a clean one.
+printf '{"mcpServers":{' > "$WORK/broken.json"
+run "$WORK/broken.json" "$ENVFILE"
+[ "$rc" -ne 0 ] && ok "unparseable config does not report success" || bad "unparseable config does not report success" "rc=0"
+
+# --- a missing env-file is unverifiable, not clean ----------------------------
+run "$WORK/good.json" "$WORK/no-such-env"
+[ "$rc" -ne 0 ] && ok "missing env-file does not report success" || bad "missing env-file does not report success" "rc=0"
+
+printf '\n%s: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$(basename "$0")" "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/pre_task_ritual_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Tests for hooks/pre-task-ritual.sh — the UserPromptSubmit hook that surfaces
+# rule 0 on every prompt (#44).
+#
+# WHY THIS EXISTS, AND WHAT IT DELIBERATELY DOES NOT CLAIM
+# This hook is three lines and echoes a string. It has no bash-isms, so it
+# cannot fail the way secret-guard appeared to; that risk was overstated when
+# this test was requested. What it CAN do is stop working silently, and its
+# whole job is to be visible -- if the text stops appearing, rule 0 stops being
+# surfaced on every prompt and nothing announces that.
+#
+# THE ASSERTION THAT MATTERS IS REGISTRATION.
+# A hook file that exists but is not in hooks.json does absolutely nothing, and
+# looks identical on disk to one that works. So this derives the command from
+# hooks.json rather than assuming one: the registration is the source of truth
+# for how the hook is invoked, and a test that invokes it its own way is
+# testing something the harness never runs.
+#
+# That distinction is not hypothetical. secret_guard_test.sh piped its hook into
+# `sh` while hooks.json runs it with `bash`; on Debian /bin/sh is dash, which
+# has no `set -o pipefail`, and the suite failed 20/20 in CI against a hook that
+# was fine in production. The test was wrong, not the hook. Deriving the
+# invocation removes the opportunity for that class of mistake entirely.
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+HOOK="$ROOT/hooks/pre-task-ritual.sh"
+REG="$ROOT/hooks/hooks.json"
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+ok() { pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$1"; }
+no() { fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n' "$1"; }
+
+if ! command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  printf '  SKIP: jq not installed -- cannot read the hook registration\n'
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+[ -f "$HOOK" ] || { printf '  FAIL %s does not exist\n' "$HOOK"; exit 1; }
+ok 'hook file exists'
+
+[ -f "$REG" ] || { printf '  FAIL %s does not exist\n' "$REG"; exit 1; }
+
+# 1. Registered, and on the right event. UserPromptSubmit is what makes it fire
+#    on every prompt; registered under any other event it would still "exist"
+#    and still do nothing useful.
+CMD=$(jq -r '
+  .hooks.UserPromptSubmit[]?.hooks[]?
+  | select(.command | test("pre-task-ritual"))
+  | .command
+' "$REG" 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+
+if [ -n "$CMD" ]; then
+  ok 'registered on UserPromptSubmit in hooks.json'
+else
+  no 'not registered on UserPromptSubmit -- the file would exist and never run'
+  printf '  %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+# 2. Run it EXACTLY as registered, with the harness variable substituted the way
+#    the harness substitutes it.
+OUT=$(CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT="$ROOT" sh -c "$CMD" 2>&1)
+rc=$?
+
+[ "$rc" -eq 0 ] && ok 'exits 0 as registered' \
+  || no "exited $rc -- a non-zero UserPromptSubmit hook can block the prompt"
+
+# 3. The content is the point. A hook that runs and says nothing is the same as
+#    no hook, and that is the failure this pins.
+if [ -n "$OUT" ]; then
+  ok 'produces output'
+else
+  no 'produced no output -- rule 0 would silently stop being surfaced'
+fi
+
+case "$OUT" in
+  *"Rule 0"*) ok 'names rule 0' ;;
+  *)          no "does not name rule 0: '$OUT'" ;;
+esac
+
+# Each of the four steps, individually. Naming rule 0 while having quietly lost
+# a step is the plausible drift, not losing the whole line.
+for step in brain_query skill 'failing test' 'success criterion'; do
+  case "$OUT" in
+    *"$step"*) ok "states the '$step' step" ;;
+    *)         no "lost the '$step' step from the ritual" ;;
+  esac
+done
+
+# 4. The interpreter named in the registration must actually exist, or the hook
+#    fails on that host with a message nobody reads.
+INTERP=${CMD%% *}
+if command -v "$INTERP" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+  ok "registered interpreter '$INTERP' is available"
+else
+  no "registered interpreter '$INTERP' not found on this host"
+fi
+
+printf '  %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]

tests/secret_guard_test.sh

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ decision_for() {
   _tool=${2:-Bash}
   jq -n --arg t "$_tool" --arg c "$_cmd" \
     '{tool_name: $t, tool_input: {command: $c}}' \
-    | sh "$GUARD" \
+    | "$GUARD" \
     | jq -r '.hookSpecificOutput.permissionDecision // "MISSING"'
 }
 
@@ -42,6 +42,20 @@ expect() {
   fi
 }
 
+# Invoked as a PROGRAM above, never as `sh "$GUARD"`. Claude Code executes the
+# hook directly, so its `#!/usr/bin/env bash` shebang decides the interpreter;
+# piping it into `sh` overrides that and tests something production never runs.
+#
+# It is not academic. On Debian /bin/sh is dash, which has no `set -o
+# pipefail`, so the guard died on line 23 before reading a byte of input and
+# every deny case returned empty -- 20 of 20 assertions failed in CI while
+# passing on a host where /bin/sh happens to be bash. A security gate that
+# tests green and cannot start is the worst of both.
+if [ ! -x "$GUARD" ]; then
+  printf 'FAIL: %s is not executable -- it must run via its own shebang\n' "$GUARD"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
 if [ ! -f "$GUARD" ]; then
   printf 'FAIL: %s does not exist\n' "$GUARD"
   exit 1

tests/traceability_test.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Tests for skills/traceability/trace.sh.
+#
+# The RED run for #10 established what a forward trace costs by hand: sixteen
+# commands, of which the decisive ones were reading issue comments and running a
+# probe against a claim. This tool does the mechanical half — what git can prove
+# — and, more importantly, states what it CANNOT prove, so an unverifiable link
+# never reads as a verified one.
+
+set -u
+
+ROOT=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/.." && pwd)
+SUT="$ROOT/skills/traceability/trace.sh"
+
+pass=0
+fail=0
+WORK=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/traceability_test.$$
+
+if [ ! -f "$SUT" ]; then
+  printf 'FAIL: %s does not exist\n' "$SUT"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+cleanup() { rm -rf "$WORK"; }
+trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
+
+mkdir -p "$WORK/repo/tests"
+cd "$WORK/repo" || exit 1
+git init -q .
+git config user.email t@example.com
+git config user.name test
+# A remote is needed for the tool to turn "#37" into a checkable URL, which is
+# the point of that section.
+git remote add origin https://git.d-ma.be/mathias/demo.git
+
+printf 'baseline\n' > README.md
+git add -A && git commit -qm "chore: baseline"
+
+printf 'gate\n' > gate.sh
+printf 'case\n' > tests/gate_test.sh
+git add -A && git commit -qm "feat(gate): add the thing
+
+Implements the decision recorded in #5, filed as #37.
+
+Closes #37"
+SHA=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
+git tag -a v1.2.0 -m "release v1.2.0"
+
+printf 'more\n' >> gate.sh
+git add -A && git commit -qm "chore: later work"
+
+cd - >/dev/null || exit 1
+out=$(sh "$SUT" "$SHA" "$WORK/repo" 2>&1)
+
+check() {
+  if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -q "$1"; then
+    pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   %s\n' "$2"
+  else
+    fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL %s\n       output had no %s\n%s\n' "$2" "$1" "$out"
+  fi
+}
+
+check '#5'              'lists every issue the commit references, not just the closing one'
+check '#37'             'lists the closing reference'
+check 'tests/gate_test.sh' 'names the test files the commit touched'
+check 'v1.2.0'          'names the release that contains it'
+check 'Cannot verify' 'states what it could not verify'
+check 'issues/37'       'emits a checkable URL for the tracker link it cannot follow'
+
+# A commit in no release must say so — "no tag" and "not checked" are different
+# answers and only one of them is about the commit.
+last=$(git -C "$WORK/repo" rev-parse --short HEAD)
+out=$(sh "$SUT" "$last" "$WORK/repo" 2>&1)
+if printf '%s' "$out" | grep -qi 'no release contains'; then
+  pass=$((pass + 1)); printf '  ok   an unreleased commit is reported as unreleased\n'
+else
+  fail=$((fail + 1)); printf '  FAIL an unreleased commit is reported as unreleased\n%s\n' "$out"
+fi
+
+printf '\ntraceability: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
+[ "$fail" -eq 0 ]