Compare commits

..
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
mathias b2af4e1129 feat(doctor): --online, for the release a host has never fetched
CI / Check / Test (push) Successful in 1s
CI / Tag release (push) Successful in 1s
Everything doctor checks compares copies already on the machine, deliberately —
it runs in a SessionStart hook where latency shows, and its header promises no
network I/O. That leaves exactly one case invisible, and #30 walked straight
into it: a host whose checkout, marketplace clone and installed plugin all agree
reads as clean while all three sit a release behind origin.

`--online` closes it with one `git ls-remote`, opt-in, for a scheduled per-host
job rather than the session hook. Comparison is by order, not equality, so a
host ahead of the newest tag — normal between a release commit and its tag —
stays quiet.

An unreachable remote is a WARN naming itself, not a staleness FAIL. "I could
not check" and "you are behind" are different answers, and collapsing them would
make a network blip look like a stale library.

The remote URL is never printed: a remote rewritten by url.insteadOf expands
into a live token, which is a documented way this fleet has leaked one before.

Five fixture cases through a $DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD seam, including one that
asserts the DEFAULT run performs no lookup at all — the promise in the header is
now a test, not a comment. Verified live on koala:

  $ bin/doctor --online
  FAIL behind: this host has 0.12.1; origin has released 0.13.4
  $ bin/doctor
  skills doctor: clean — 41 skills

Closes #38
Bump-Type: minor
2026-08-29 14:52:52 +02:00
mathias 3c8d2f5613 chore(release): plugin.json version 0.13.4
Skip-Release: true
2026-08-29 12:50:31 +00:00
mathias 1d368d4b5d docs(skills): drop the Mode 2 routing notes, fix the contributing steps
CI / Check / Test (push) Successful in 1s
CI / Tag release (push) Successful in 1s
Seven skills carried a `## Mode 2 Routing Note` citing a routing pod ("Plan 6")
that does not exist. Several admitted in their own text that nothing about the
skill changes between modes — so it was roughly ten lines of context on every
load for zero behavioural effect. The content is not worthless, just not
per-skill: it now lives as one table in README.md, with the caveat that nothing
depends on it.

The related line inside the session_log sections stays, because that one does
motivate behaviour — but it no longer cites a component that has never shipped.
It now says what is true: pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be
based on, and a skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.

While in README: the contributing steps were stale enough to fail CI for anyone
who followed them. They said to add a row to SKILLS_INDEX.md by hand — the table
is generated now, and `task check` fails on a hand-edited diff — and listed none
of the four frontmatter keys the gates require. Step 4 now names the
pressure-test bar from #19 rather than leaving it to be discovered.

Closes #36
Bump-Type: patch
2026-08-29 14:50:14 +02:00
mathias a565b04e91 chore(release): plugin.json version 0.13.3
Skip-Release: true
2026-08-29 12:49:56 +00:00
12 changed files with 175 additions and 49 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{ {
"name": "skills", "name": "skills",
"description": "Mathias's engineering skills library, plus the hooks and MCP servers that make it enforceable: TDD, clean code, debugging, specs, discovery, CI, and secret hygiene.", "description": "Mathias's engineering skills library, plus the hooks and MCP servers that make it enforceable: TDD, clean code, debugging, specs, discovery, CI, and secret hygiene.",
"version": "0.13.2", "version": "0.13.4",
"author": { "author": {
"name": "Mathias", "name": "Mathias",
"url": "https://git.d-ma.be/mathias" "url": "https://git.d-ma.be/mathias"
+59 -9
View File
@@ -110,10 +110,25 @@ Antigravity and Mistral Vibe targets were removed — unused.
task doctor # or bin/doctor task doctor # or bin/doctor
``` ```
Reports dangling links, links resolving into a foreign checkout, skill-count Reports dangling links, links into a source nobody configured, skills in the
mismatches, stray entries, and leftover per-skill Claude symlinks. Non-zero checkout with no link, stray entries, leftover per-skill Claude symlinks, and a
exit on drift. It also runs at session start via the plugin, so a drifting Claude Code plugin sitting on an older generation than the host already has.
host says so rather than waiting to be discovered. Non-zero exit on drift. It also runs at session start via the plugin, so a
drifting host says so rather than waiting to be discovered.
All of that compares copies already on the machine — deliberately, since it
runs in a session hook where latency shows. That leaves one case invisible: a
host where the checkout, the marketplace clone and the installed plugin all
agree, and all three are a release behind origin.
```bash
task doctor -- --online # or bin/doctor --online
```
One `git ls-remote` against origin, opt-in. Belongs in a scheduled per-host job,
not the session hook. An unreachable remote is reported as its own fault rather
than as staleness — "I could not check" and "you are behind" are different
answers and only one of them is about the host.
## Versioning ## Versioning
@@ -130,13 +145,48 @@ before `task skills:install`; default is `main` for always-current.
## Contributing a skill ## Contributing a skill
1. Add a directory `<short-kebab-name>/`. 1. Add a directory `skills/<short-kebab-name>/`.
2. Create `<short-kebab-name>/SKILL.md` — start with one-paragraph 2. Create `skills/<short-kebab-name>/SKILL.md` with this frontmatter — all four
purpose, then triggers ("use when …"), then mechanics. keys are gated by `task check`, and the index table is generated from the
3. Add a row to `SKILLS_INDEX.md` (description + use-when). last three:
4. Commit directly to `main`. Conventional-commit prefix
```yaml
---
name: <short-kebab-name>
surfaces: [claude-code, library] # any of claude-code | library | chat
summary: "<one line for the index table>"
use_when: "<the trigger, for the index table>"
description: <the paragraph the model selects on>
---
```
Then: one-paragraph purpose, triggers ("use when …"), mechanics.
3. Run `task index` and commit the regenerated `SKILLS_INDEX.md`. Do **not**
hand-edit the table — `task check` regenerates it and fails on a diff.
4. Pressure-test it before shipping: run the scenario against a subagent that
does *not* have the skill, write the skill against what that run actually
did, then re-run with it. See `superpowers-writing-skills` and #19.
5. Commit directly to `main`. Conventional-commit prefix
(`feat:` / `fix:` / `docs:`). Add `Bump-Type: minor` footer when (`feat:` / `fix:` / `docs:`). Add `Bump-Type: minor` footer when
adding a new skill or expanding scope; default patch covers edits. adding a new skill or expanding scope; default patch covers edits.
This repo is markdown-only and public — never include secrets, client This repo is markdown-only and public — never include secrets, client
names, or anything under NDA in a skill. names, or anything under NDA in a skill.
## Mode 2 routing candidates
These notes used to sit in each SKILL.md as a `## Mode 2 Routing Note` section.
They changed nothing about how the skill is invoked — several said so outright —
and cost context on every load, so they live here instead. Nothing in the repo
depends on this table; it is a record of which skills looked mechanical enough
to route to a local model, should a routing layer ever exist.
| Skill | Note |
|---|---|
| `cad-babysit` | Phases 2-4 (reading comments/logs, classifying fault vs outcome) are judgment-heavy and should stay Mode 1. Phase 1 (running `cad stuck` and grouping its output) is mechanical and a Mode 2 routing candidate once Plan 6 ships the routing pod. |
| `code-review` | This skill is invoked identically in Mode 1 (cloud Claude) and Mode 2 (client-local with supervisor routing). The routing layer (Plan 6) does not exist yet; treat this skill as Mode 1 only for now. Findings format and severity classification are unchanged across modes. |
| `debug` | This skill produces high-volume mechanical output (hypothesis enumeration) and is a candidate for Mode 2 routing to a local model in the future. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only. The hypothesis format and discipline are identical regardless of which model generates them. |
| `feature-spec` | Spec writing requires interpretation of intent and tradeoff reasoning — work where Claude generally outperforms a 9-13B local model. This skill is intentionally **not** a Mode 2 routing candidate. In Mode 2, the routing layer should leave `feature-spec` calls on Claude. |
| `session-retrospective` | Reading long session logs and pulling themes is high-volume, mechanical pattern-recognition work — a strong Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only. |
| `tdd` | This skill is invoked identically whether the agent is running in Mode 1 (cloud Claude, no routing) or Mode 2 (client-local, supervisor routing layer). The routing pod (Plan 6) does not exist yet; until it does, treat this skill as Mode 1 only. The discipline does not change between modes — only the model behind the call. |
| `trainer` | Trainer is the same shape as `session-retrospective` — long-context reading, mechanical filtering — and is a Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6, treat as Mode 1 only. |
+41 -2
View File
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
# doctor human report, non-zero exit on drift # doctor human report, non-zero exit on drift
# doctor --quiet print only when something is wrong (SessionStart hook) # doctor --quiet print only when something is wrong (SessionStart hook)
# doctor --json machine-readable findings # doctor --json machine-readable findings
# doctor --online ALSO ask origin for the latest tag (one network call)
# #
# POSIX sh on purpose: it runs on macOS and Linux, before any toolchain is # POSIX sh on purpose: it runs on macOS and Linux, before any toolchain is
# guaranteed present, and inside a session-start hook where latency shows. # guaranteed present, and inside a session-start hook where latency shows.
@@ -21,10 +22,12 @@ set -u
QUIET=0 QUIET=0
JSON=0 JSON=0
ONLINE=0
for arg in "$@"; do for arg in "$@"; do
case "$arg" in case "$arg" in
--quiet) QUIET=1 ;; --quiet) QUIET=1 ;;
--json) JSON=1 ;; --json) JSON=1 ;;
--online) ONLINE=1 ;;
-h|--help) -h|--help)
sed -n '2,20p' "$0" | sed 's/^# \{0,1\}//' sed -n '2,20p' "$0" | sed 's/^# \{0,1\}//'
exit 0 ;; exit 0 ;;
@@ -288,6 +291,42 @@ if [ -n "$installed_v" ] && [ -n "$available_v" ] && [ "$installed_v" != "$avail
add FAIL plugin-version "Claude Code has skills@mathias $installed_v installed but $available_v is available on this host — /plugin update skills@mathias (a host stale enough to matter is running the old doctor, so the first detection may need this run by hand)" add FAIL plugin-version "Claude Code has skills@mathias $installed_v installed but $available_v is available on this host — /plugin update skills@mathias (a host stale enough to matter is running the old doctor, so the first detection may need this run by hand)"
fi fi
# --- optional: the release this host has never fetched ----------------------
# Every check above compares copies already present, so a host whose checkout,
# marketplace clone and installed plugin all agree reads as clean while sitting
# a release behind origin (#38). Closing that needs a network call, which the
# default run must not make — hence opt-in, for a scheduled per-host job rather
# than the SessionStart hook.
#
# $DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD is the test seam; it prints the newest remote tag.
if [ "$ONLINE" -eq 1 ]; then
if [ -n "${DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD:-}" ]; then
remote_tag=$(eval "$DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD" 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | tr -d '[:space:]')
else
# The URL is never printed: a remote rewritten by url.insteadOf can expand
# into a live token.
origin=$(git -C "$CHECKOUT" config --get remote.origin.url 2>/dev/null || true)
if [ -n "$origin" ]; then
remote_tag=$(git ls-remote --tags --refs "$origin" 2>/dev/null \
| sed 's#.*refs/tags/##' | sort -t. -k1,1n -k2,2n -k3,3n | tail -1 | tr -d '[:space:]')
else
remote_tag=''
fi
fi
if [ -z "$remote_tag" ]; then
# Not drift. A host that cannot reach origin has an unanswered question,
# not a stale library, and saying otherwise would make the two look alike.
add WARN offline "could not reach origin for the latest tag — this run proves nothing about staleness"
else
remote_v=${remote_tag#v}
if [ -n "$available_v" ] && [ "$remote_v" != "$available_v" ] \
&& [ "$(newer_version "$available_v" "$remote_v")" = "$remote_v" ]; then
add FAIL behind "this host has $available_v; origin has released $remote_v — run 'task update' and '/plugin update skills@mathias'"
fi
fi
fi
# --- output ----------------------------------------------------------------- # --- output -----------------------------------------------------------------
if [ "$JSON" -eq 1 ]; then if [ "$JSON" -eq 1 ]; then
printf '{"checkout":"%s","expected":%s,"plugin":{"installed":"%s","available":"%s"},"findings":[%s]}\n' \ printf '{"checkout":"%s","expected":%s,"plugin":{"installed":"%s","available":"%s"},"findings":[%s]}\n' \
-6
View File
@@ -247,12 +247,6 @@ decide
- `fail` — the phase could not be completed (e.g. `cad stuck` errored, Gitea was unreachable). - `fail` — the phase could not be completed (e.g. `cad stuck` errored, Gitea was unreachable).
- `skip` — phase intentionally skipped (e.g. Phase 3 skipped because Phase 2 was conclusive). - `skip` — phase intentionally skipped (e.g. Phase 3 skipped because Phase 2 was conclusive).
## Mode 2 Routing Note
Phases 2-4 (reading comments/logs, classifying fault vs outcome) are judgment-heavy and should
stay Mode 1. Phase 1 (running `cad stuck` and grouping its output) is mechanical and a Mode 2
routing candidate once Plan 6 ships the routing pod.
## Cross-References ## Cross-References
- Depends on `mathias/cad#14`'s `cad stuck` query — this skill is the ritual around it, not a - Depends on `mathias/cad#14`'s `cad stuck` query — this skill is the ritual around it, not a
+1 -5
View File
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached. - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached.
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally. - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
## Common Go Anti-Patterns ## Common Go Anti-Patterns
@@ -285,7 +285,3 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- Load `refactoring` skill when recommending fixes - Load `refactoring` skill when recommending fixes
- Load `test-design` skill for reviewing test quality - Load `test-design` skill for reviewing test quality
- Load `solid` skill for SOLID principle violations - Load `solid` skill for SOLID principle violations
## Mode 2 Routing Note
This skill is invoked identically in Mode 1 (cloud Claude) and Mode 2 (client-local with supervisor routing). The routing layer (Plan 6) does not exist yet; treat this skill as Mode 1 only for now. Findings format and severity classification are unchanged across modes.
+1 -5
View File
@@ -163,11 +163,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached. - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached.
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally. - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
## Mode 2 Routing Note
This skill produces high-volume mechanical output (hypothesis enumeration) and is a candidate for Mode 2 routing to a local model in the future. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only. The hypothesis format and discipline are identical regardless of which model generates them.
## Cross-References ## Cross-References
+1 -5
View File
@@ -254,11 +254,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (spec rejected, blocked on unresolved questions). - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (spec rejected, blocked on unresolved questions).
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally. - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
## Mode 2 Routing Note
Spec writing requires interpretation of intent and tradeoff reasoning — work where Claude generally outperforms a 9-13B local model. This skill is intentionally **not** a Mode 2 routing candidate. In Mode 2, the routing layer should leave `feature-spec` calls on Claude.
## Cross-References ## Cross-References
+1 -5
View File
@@ -125,11 +125,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (retrospective could not produce coherent candidates). - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (retrospective could not produce coherent candidates).
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (no novel learnings worth surfacing). - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (no novel learnings worth surfacing).
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
## Mode 2 Routing Note
Reading long session logs and pulling themes is high-volume, mechanical pattern-recognition work — a strong Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6 ships the routing pod, treat as Mode 1 only.
## Cross-References ## Cross-References
+1 -1
View File
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (gate blocked, rework required). - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (gate blocked, rework required).
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally. - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally.
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
## Cross-References ## Cross-References
+1 -5
View File
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (test compiled when it shouldn't, test still fails after green attempt, refactor broke tests). - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached (test compiled when it shouldn't, test still fails after green attempt, refactor broke tests).
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (e.g. refactor not warranted). - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (e.g. refactor not warranted).
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future `tdd` call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data and may default-route or default-not-route in a way that doesn't reflect real performance. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a `tdd` call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way, and a decision made on no evidence is a coin flip wearing a metric.
## Final Rule ## Final Rule
@@ -429,7 +429,3 @@ Otherwise → not TDD
``` ```
No exceptions without Mathias's permission. No exceptions without Mathias's permission.
## Mode 2 Routing Note
This skill is invoked identically whether the agent is running in Mode 1 (cloud Claude, no routing) or Mode 2 (client-local, supervisor routing layer). The routing pod (Plan 6) does not exist yet; until it does, treat this skill as Mode 1 only. The discipline does not change between modes — only the model behind the call.
+1 -5
View File
@@ -243,11 +243,7 @@ treats `pass` as success, `fail` as failure, `skip` as neither.
- `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached. - `fail` — the phase's intended outcome was NOT reached.
- `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (e.g. no candidates passed the gate, write skipped). - `skip` — phase was skipped intentionally (e.g. no candidates passed the gate, write skipped).
**Why this matters:** the routing pod (Plan 6) reads pass-rate to decide whether to route a future call to a local model. If your skill never logs, the routing pod sees no data. **Why this matters:** pass-rate is what a future routing decision would be based on — whether a given call can be served by a local model instead of a cloud one. A skill that never logs contributes no evidence either way.
## Mode 2 Routing Note
Trainer is the same shape as `session-retrospective` — long-context reading, mechanical filtering — and is a Mode 2 routing candidate. Until Plan 6, treat as Mode 1 only.
## Cross-References ## Cross-References
+67
View File
@@ -224,5 +224,72 @@ manifest "$f/ck" 0.7.0
manifest "$f/home/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/mathias" 0.9.0 manifest "$f/home/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/mathias" 0.9.0
assert_fails "$f" '0.9.0' 'a newer marketplace clone is reported' assert_fails "$f" '0.9.0' 'a newer marketplace clone is reported'
# --- 9. --online: the release this host has never fetched ------------------
# Everything above compares copies already on the host, so a host where the
# checkout, the marketplace clone and the installed plugin all agree reads as
# clean while being a release behind origin. Offline by design (#30); this is
# the opt-in that closes it (#38).
#
# The remote lookup is stubbed through $DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD so no test needs
# a network or a real remote.
online_fixture() {
_f=$(new_fixture "$1"); wire_clean "$_f"
installed_state "$_f" "$2"
manifest "$_f/ck" "$2"
printf '%s' "$_f"
}
# assert_online <fixture> <stub-tag> <want-rc> <needle> <label>
assert_online() {
_out=$(HOME="$1/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$1/ck" \
DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD="printf %s\\n $2" sh "$DOCTOR" --online 2>&1); _rc=$?
if [ "$3" -eq 0 ] && [ "$_rc" -ne 0 ]; then
fail=$((fail + 1)); printf ' FAIL %s\n exited %s on a current host\n got: %s\n' "$5" "$_rc" "$_out"; return
fi
if [ "$3" -ne 0 ] && [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
fail=$((fail + 1)); printf ' FAIL %s\n exited 0; staleness went unreported\n' "$5"; return
fi
if [ -n "$4" ] && ! printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -q -- "$4"; then
fail=$((fail + 1)); printf ' FAIL %s\n report never mentions "%s"\n got: %s\n' "$5" "$4" "$_out"; return
fi
pass=$((pass + 1)); printf ' ok %s\n' "$5"
}
f=$(online_fixture behind 0.8.0)
assert_online "$f" v0.9.0 1 '0.9.0' '--online reports a release the host has not fetched'
f=$(online_fixture current 0.9.0)
assert_online "$f" v0.9.0 0 '' '--online stays quiet when the host is current'
# A host AHEAD of the newest tag is the normal state between a release commit
# and its tag; that is not drift (same reasoning as check's ordering rule).
f=$(online_fixture ahead 0.9.1)
assert_online "$f" v0.9.0 0 '' '--online does not complain about being ahead'
# Without the flag, no lookup happens at all — the stub would report a newer
# tag and must be ignored.
f=$(online_fixture offline 0.8.0)
_out=$(HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" \
DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD="printf v9.9.9\\n" sh "$DOCTOR" 2>&1); _rc=$?
if [ "$_rc" -eq 0 ]; then
pass=$((pass + 1)); printf ' ok the default run performs no remote lookup\n'
else
fail=$((fail + 1)); printf ' FAIL the default run performs no remote lookup\n got: %s\n' "$_out"
fi
# A remote that cannot be reached is not drift and must not be reported as it.
# An unreachable remote produces no output at all, so it gets its own run
# rather than an empty stub argument — "prints nothing" and "prints an empty
# string" are different things and only the first is the case under test.
f=$(online_fixture unreachable 0.9.0)
_out=$(HOME="$f/home" DOCTOR_CHECKOUT="$f/ck" \
DOCTOR_LATEST_TAG_CMD="true" sh "$DOCTOR" --online 2>&1); _rc=$?
if [ "$_rc" -ne 0 ] && printf '%s' "$_out" | grep -q 'could not'; then
pass=$((pass + 1)); printf ' ok --online reports an unreachable remote as its own fault\n'
else
fail=$((fail + 1)); printf ' FAIL --online reports an unreachable remote as its own fault\n rc=%s got: %s\n' "$_rc" "$_out"
fi
printf '\ndoctor: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail" printf '\ndoctor: %d passed, %d failed\n' "$pass" "$fail"
[ "$fail" -eq 0 ] [ "$fail" -eq 0 ]