feat(store): throttled per-day StampLogin + login_events delete cascade

StampLogin appends one login_events row per user per day via an atomic
INSERT ... SELECT ... WHERE NOT EXISTS, run through withUser so the throttle
probe is itself RLS-scoped to the caller. DeleteUser now deletes login_events
explicitly (no FK = no cascade — the summary_actions footgun, repeated).

Extends the two-user RLS isolation proof and the delete-account proof to cover
login_events, and adds throttle / new-day / user-scoping tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-03 23:46:03 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent b070347597
commit de54cd33b2
4 changed files with 144 additions and 6 deletions
+9 -4
View File
@@ -13,10 +13,11 @@ import (
// Deleting the users row cascades (ON DELETE CASCADE) to videos, transcripts,
// summaries (→ sink_deliveries), video_connections, and the user_identities map
// — referential-integrity cascades bypass RLS, so a user's child rows are removed
// even though the deleting connection is scoped. summary_actions is the exception:
// it carries a user_id but has NO foreign key to users (migration 002), so the
// cascade does not reach it; it is deleted explicitly in the same scoped
// transaction. Deleting an absent user is a no-op (idempotent).
// even though the deleting connection is scoped. summary_actions and login_events
// are the exceptions: each carries a user_id but has NO foreign key to users
// (migrations 002 and 010), so the cascade does not reach them; they are deleted
// explicitly in the same scoped transaction. Deleting an absent user is a no-op
// (idempotent).
//
// This is tapir-side only (decision 2026-06-03): it removes all tapir data; the
// Dex login identity is left untouched — a later login simply re-enters
@@ -28,6 +29,10 @@ func (s *Store) DeleteUser(ctx context.Context, userID string) error {
`DELETE FROM summary_actions WHERE user_id = $1`, userID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("store: delete summary_actions: %w", err)
}
if _, err := tx.Exec(ctx,
`DELETE FROM login_events WHERE user_id = $1`, userID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("store: delete login_events: %w", err)
}
if _, err := tx.Exec(ctx,
`DELETE FROM users WHERE id = $1`, userID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("store: delete user: %w", err)
+41
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
package store
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"github.com/jackc/pgx/v5"
)
// StampLogin records that the user was active today, throttled to one row per
// user per day. It is the read-side counterpart to SetAction: the middleware
// calls it on every authenticated request, but the append happens at most once a
// day so login_events stays small and the signal clean (one row = one active
// day, not one request).
//
// The check-and-insert is a single atomic statement: the INSERT ... SELECT ...
// WHERE NOT EXISTS only writes when no row for this user has seen_at in today
// (date_trunc('day', NOW()), server timezone). It runs through withUser, so the
// NOT EXISTS probe is itself RLS-scoped to the calling user via the
// tapir.current_user_id GUC — one user's stamp can never be suppressed or
// triggered by another user's rows. The explicit user_id predicate also keeps the
// probe on the (user_id, seen_at) index.
//
// A unique constraint is deliberately not used: under concurrent same-day
// requests the worst case is two rows for one day, which the gate query collapses
// to a single week bucket anyway — not worth a write-blocking constraint.
func (s *Store) StampLogin(ctx context.Context, userID string) error {
if err := s.withUser(ctx, userID, func(tx pgx.Tx) error {
_, err := tx.Exec(ctx,
`INSERT INTO login_events (user_id)
SELECT $1
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM login_events
WHERE user_id = $1 AND seen_at >= date_trunc('day', NOW())
)`, userID)
return err
}); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("store: stamp login: %w", err)
}
return nil
}
+83
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
package store_test
import (
"context"
"testing"
"github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/pgxpool"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
// countLoginEvents counts a user's login_events via the superuser pool, which
// bypasses RLS — so the assertion sees the true row count regardless of scope.
func countLoginEvents(t *testing.T, p *pgxpool.Pool, userID string) int {
t.Helper()
var n int
require.NoError(t, p.QueryRow(context.Background(),
`SELECT count(*) FROM login_events WHERE user_id = $1`, userID).Scan(&n))
return n
}
// TestStampLoginThrottlesToOnePerDay: repeated stamps within the same day insert
// exactly one row — the throttle that keeps login_events one-row-per-active-day.
func TestStampLoginThrottlesToOnePerDay(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
s := newStore(t)
super := rawPool(t)
resetDB(t, super)
_, err := super.Exec(ctx, `INSERT INTO users (id) VALUES ($1)`, userA)
require.NoError(t, err)
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
require.NoError(t, s.StampLogin(ctx, userA))
}
require.Equal(t, 1, countLoginEvents(t, super, userA),
"three same-day stamps must collapse to one row")
}
// TestStampLoginRecordsOncePerNewDay: with yesterday's row already present, a
// stamp today is NOT throttled — it appends the day's row, so distinct active days
// accumulate (the substrate the gate's distinct-week count reads).
func TestStampLoginRecordsOncePerNewDay(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
s := newStore(t)
super := rawPool(t)
resetDB(t, super)
_, err := super.Exec(ctx, `INSERT INTO users (id) VALUES ($1)`, userA)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Seed an event dated yesterday (before today's start), so the throttle's
// "row exists with seen_at >= start-of-today" probe finds nothing for today.
_, err = super.Exec(ctx,
`INSERT INTO login_events (user_id, seen_at) VALUES ($1, NOW() - INTERVAL '1 day')`, userA)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NoError(t, s.StampLogin(ctx, userA))
require.Equal(t, 2, countLoginEvents(t, super, userA),
"a stamp on a new day must append a second row")
// A second stamp the same day is throttled again.
require.NoError(t, s.StampLogin(ctx, userA))
require.Equal(t, 2, countLoginEvents(t, super, userA),
"the same-day repeat must not add a third row")
}
// TestStampLoginIsUserScoped: one user's stamp lands only on that user's rows —
// the throttle probe is RLS-scoped, so user B's existing same-day row neither
// suppresses nor is touched by user A's stamp.
func TestStampLoginIsUserScoped(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
s := newStore(t)
super := rawPool(t)
resetDB(t, super)
_, err := super.Exec(ctx, `INSERT INTO users (id) VALUES ($1), ($2)`, userA, userB)
require.NoError(t, err)
// B already has a same-day row; it must not throttle A's first stamp.
_, err = super.Exec(ctx, `INSERT INTO login_events (user_id) VALUES ($1)`, userB)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NoError(t, s.StampLogin(ctx, userA))
require.Equal(t, 1, countLoginEvents(t, super, userA), "A's stamp must record despite B's same-day row")
require.Equal(t, 1, countLoginEvents(t, super, userB), "A's stamp must not touch B's rows")
}
+11 -2
View File
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import (
// userIsolatedTables are the tables that carry a user_id and whose policy keys
// directly off the tapir.current_user_id GUC.
var userIsolatedTables = []string{
"users", "videos", "transcripts", "summaries", "summary_actions", "video_connections",
"users", "videos", "transcripts", "summaries", "summary_actions", "login_events", "video_connections",
}
// allIsolatedTables adds sink_deliveries, whose ownership is derived from its
@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ func seedUser(t *testing.T, p *pgxpool.Pool, userID string) seeded {
VALUES ($1, $2, 'watched')`, userID, videoID)
require.NoError(t, err)
_, err = p.Exec(ctx,
`INSERT INTO login_events (user_id) VALUES ($1)`, userID)
require.NoError(t, err)
_, err = p.Exec(ctx,
`INSERT INTO sink_deliveries (summary_id, sink, status)
VALUES ($1, 'store', 'delivered')`, summaryID)
@@ -185,10 +189,12 @@ func TestRLSEnforcesPerUserIsolation(t *testing.T) {
{"update transcripts", `UPDATE transcripts SET content = 'hacked' WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"update summaries", `UPDATE summaries SET summary = 'hacked' WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"update summary_actions", `UPDATE summary_actions SET action = 'skipped' WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"update login_events", `UPDATE login_events SET seen_at = NOW() WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"update sink_deliveries", `UPDATE sink_deliveries SET status = 'hacked' WHERE summary_id = $1`, b.summaryID},
{"update video_connections", `UPDATE video_connections SET token_ref = 'hacked' WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"delete summaries", `DELETE FROM summaries WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"delete summary_actions", `DELETE FROM summary_actions WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"delete login_events", `DELETE FROM login_events WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
{"delete sink_deliveries", `DELETE FROM sink_deliveries WHERE summary_id = $1`, b.summaryID},
{"delete video_connections", `DELETE FROM video_connections WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID},
}
@@ -205,17 +211,20 @@ func TestRLSEnforcesPerUserIsolation(t *testing.T) {
`SELECT summary FROM summaries WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID).Scan(&bSummary))
require.Equal(t, "sum", bSummary, "B's summary must be untouched by A's writes")
var bSummaries, bActions, bDeliveries, bConnections int
var bSummaries, bActions, bLogins, bDeliveries, bConnections int
require.NoError(t, super.QueryRow(ctx,
`SELECT count(*) FROM summaries WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID).Scan(&bSummaries))
require.NoError(t, super.QueryRow(ctx,
`SELECT count(*) FROM summary_actions WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID).Scan(&bActions))
require.NoError(t, super.QueryRow(ctx,
`SELECT count(*) FROM login_events WHERE user_id = $1`, b.userID).Scan(&bLogins))
require.NoError(t, super.QueryRow(ctx,
fmt.Sprintf(`SELECT count(*) FROM sink_deliveries WHERE summary_id = '%s'`, b.summaryID)).Scan(&bDeliveries))
require.NoError(t, super.QueryRow(ctx,
`SELECT count(*) FROM video_connections WHERE user_id = $1 AND token_ref <> 'hacked'`, b.userID).Scan(&bConnections))
require.Equal(t, 1, bSummaries, "A's DELETE must not have removed B's summary")
require.Equal(t, 1, bActions, "A's DELETE must not have removed B's action")
require.Equal(t, 1, bLogins, "A's DELETE must not have removed B's login event")
require.Equal(t, 1, bDeliveries, "A's DELETE must not have removed B's delivery")
require.Equal(t, 1, bConnections, "A's writes must not have touched B's connection")