mathiasandClaude Opus 4.8
1e29c6d1af
release / tag (push) Failing after 1s
Consolidating the divergence between this repo and local-dev's embedded ~/dev/.skills/ (the two had drifted; the 19 overlapping skills were byte-identical). - Import the 17 skills that existed only in local-dev: discovery-framing, stage-gate-review, web-shot, and the 14 superpowers-* skills. This repo is now the superset / single source of truth. - SKILLS_INDEX.md: add rows for the 17. - install.sh + Taskfile.yml: git.d-ma.be host (was stale gitea.d-ma.be, which broke the one-line curl|bash installer post-rename). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
50 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# Plan Document Reviewer Prompt Template
|
|
|
|
Use this template when dispatching a plan document reviewer subagent.
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Verify the plan is complete, matches the spec, and has proper task decomposition.
|
|
|
|
**Dispatch after:** The complete plan is written.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Task tool (general-purpose):
|
|
description: "Review plan document"
|
|
prompt: |
|
|
You are a plan document reviewer. Verify this plan is complete and ready for implementation.
|
|
|
|
**Plan to review:** [PLAN_FILE_PATH]
|
|
**Spec for reference:** [SPEC_FILE_PATH]
|
|
|
|
## What to Check
|
|
|
|
| Category | What to Look For |
|
|
|----------|------------------|
|
|
| Completeness | TODOs, placeholders, incomplete tasks, missing steps |
|
|
| Spec Alignment | Plan covers spec requirements, no major scope creep |
|
|
| Task Decomposition | Tasks have clear boundaries, steps are actionable |
|
|
| Buildability | Could an engineer follow this plan without getting stuck? |
|
|
|
|
## Calibration
|
|
|
|
**Only flag issues that would cause real problems during implementation.**
|
|
An implementer building the wrong thing or getting stuck is an issue.
|
|
Minor wording, stylistic preferences, and "nice to have" suggestions are not.
|
|
|
|
Approve unless there are serious gaps — missing requirements from the spec,
|
|
contradictory steps, placeholder content, or tasks so vague they can't be acted on.
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
## Plan Review
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Approved | Issues Found
|
|
|
|
**Issues (if any):**
|
|
- [Task X, Step Y]: [specific issue] - [why it matters for implementation]
|
|
|
|
**Recommendations (advisory, do not block approval):**
|
|
- [suggestions for improvement]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Reviewer returns:** Status, Issues (if any), Recommendations
|