mathias
e12ac99465
Three similarly-named skills cover orthogonal concerns — what to check (code-review), how to commission a reviewer (requesting), how to behave when feedback arrives (receiving) — and none of them mentioned the other two. An agent landing on one had no way to learn the others existed. One line each, placed at the core-principle line where a reader is already oriented. stage-gate-review's gate-prep step now says to run grill-me's Full Grill before bringing an ask: a council's hard questions are cheaper answered in private, and a gap found by grilling is one you close rather than one the gate reports. The bug half: receiving-code-review cited "You're absolutely right!" as an "explicit CLAUDE.md violation". That is obra's upstream convention leaking through the vendored copy — `grep -ci "absolutely right" ~/dev/CLAUDE.md` is 0, and so is AGENT.md. The guidance is right, the citation was inventing authority it did not have; it now says what it actually is, performative agreement rather than evaluation. Closes #16 Bump-Type: patch